Suppr超能文献

锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)与牙周骨丧失直接手术测量的可靠性和准确性比较评估:一项前瞻性横断面研究。

Comparative Assessment of Reliability and Accuracy of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Over Direct Surgical Measurement for Periodontal Bone Loss: A Prospective, Cross-Sectional Study.

作者信息

Patil Anshuman B, Patil Nileshrao, Singh Romalpreet, Razdan Priyanka, Singh Sneha, Mathew Rinnu A, Banerjee Satyabrat

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Jawahar Medical Foundation's Annasaheb Chudaman Patil Memorial (JMF's ACPM) Dental College, Dhule, IND.

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Desh Bhagat Dental College, Malout, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2023 Sep 3;15(9):e44608. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44608. eCollection 2023 Sep.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Assessing bone condition holds significant value in the diagnosis, treatment planning, and prognosing the periodontal disease; its importance is undeniable. The main aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of alveolar bone measurements due to periodontal disease using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), by comparing with surgical measurements, considered as the gold standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective cross-sectional study included a sample of 40 individuals diagnosed with chronic periodontitis who required periodontal surgery. A total of 202 sites were assessed for vertical and horizontal bone loss in the anterior (76 sites) and posterior (126 sites) teeth. Bone loss was measured using CBCT and a UNC 15 periodontal probe during the surgical intervention, and then compared. The statistical analysis involved employing a Student's t-test to compare measurements. Unpaired t-tests and correlation analyses were conducted using Pearson's correlation coefficient test. To establish statistical significance, a threshold of p<0.05 was considered appropriate.

RESULTS

The statistical analysis carried out on the mean values of CBCT and direct surgical measurements for vertical bone loss demonstrated a significant difference (p<0.01). However, the values obtained for horizontal bone loss did not display statistical significance. A strong correlation of 0.94-0.99 existed between surgical and CBCT measurements. A statistically significant distinction was observed between the two methods in measuring bone loss at the distal and palatal sites of the anterior teeth.

CONCLUSION

Both CBCT and direct surgical measurement exhibit comparable accuracy potential in assessing alveolar bone loss. CBCT provides an accessibility advantage by enhancing visual access to challenging sites during surgical interventions, including palatal and distal areas of the teeth.

摘要

引言

评估骨状况在牙周病的诊断、治疗计划制定及预后判断中具有重要价值,其重要性不言而喻。本研究的主要目的是通过与被视为金标准的手术测量结果进行比较,评估锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)用于测量牙周病导致的牙槽骨吸收的准确性。

材料与方法

一项前瞻性横断面研究纳入了40例被诊断为慢性牙周炎且需要进行牙周手术的个体样本。总共对202个部位进行了评估,包括前牙(76个部位)和后牙(126个部位)的垂直和水平骨吸收情况。在手术干预期间,使用CBCT和UNC 15牙周探针测量骨吸收情况,然后进行比较。统计分析采用学生t检验来比较测量值。使用Pearson相关系数检验进行非配对t检验和相关性分析。为确定统计学意义,p<0.05的阈值被认为是合适的。

结果

对CBCT和直接手术测量的垂直骨吸收平均值进行的统计分析显示出显著差异(p<0.01)。然而,水平骨吸收获得的值未显示出统计学意义。手术测量和CBCT测量之间存在0.94 - 0.99的强相关性。在测量前牙远中及腭侧部位的骨吸收时,两种方法之间观察到统计学上的显著差异。

结论

CBCT和直接手术测量在评估牙槽骨吸收方面都具有相当的潜在准确性。CBCT通过在手术干预期间增强对具有挑战性的部位(包括牙齿的腭侧和远中区域)的可视化,提供了可及性优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a20/10547079/a565f1c8e5da/cureus-0015-00000044608-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验