Nöthel Sophie, Nübold Annika, Uitdewilligen Sjir, Schepers Jan, Hülsheger Ute
Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Work and Social Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 27;14:1149371. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1149371. eCollection 2023.
Due to the rapid changes in today's business world, leaders need to, more than ever, adequately and flexibly react to new and changing demands in the workplace. An instrument that captures adaptive leadership behavior is still missing, however. This study describes the development and validation of a concise and timely new leadership instrument, the Adaptive Leadership Behavior Scale (). Based on a thorough literature review, we developed 27 items as an initial item pool. We tested this set of items with leaders and followers in a pilot study to assess its relevancy and comprehensibility. In Study 1, a field study with 201 employees, we explored the internal structure of the initial item pool with a Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Based on the factor loadings resulting from a second PCA, we reduced the item pool, resulting in a 15-item scale for which we then assessed convergent and divergent validity. In Study 2, a field study with 311 employees, we replicated the findings of Study 1 and assessed additional convergent and divergent validity as well as the model fit with a Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). In Study 3, a multi-source field study with 155 leader-follower dyads we replicated the CFA and additionally assessed criterion-related validity. Results show that the ALBS is a concise and valid instrument for assessing adaptive leadership behavior, thereby building the grounds to extend our understanding of antecedents, mechanisms and consequences of leadership in dynamic environments.
由于当今商业世界变化迅速,领导者比以往任何时候都更需要充分且灵活地应对工作场所中不断变化的新需求。然而,目前仍缺少一种能够衡量适应性领导行为的工具。本研究描述了一种简洁且及时的新型领导工具——适应性领导行为量表(ALBS)的开发与验证过程。基于全面的文献综述,我们最初构建了包含27个条目的项目池。在一项预研究中,我们对这组条目在领导者和追随者中进行了测试,以评估其相关性和可理解性。在研究1中,我们对201名员工进行了实地研究,通过主成分分析(PCA)探索了初始项目池的内部结构。基于第二次PCA得出的因子载荷,我们对项目池进行了缩减,形成了一个包含15个条目的量表,并对其收敛效度和区分效度进行了评估。在研究2中,我们对311名员工进行了实地研究,重复了研究1的结果,并通过验证性因子分析(CFA)评估了额外的收敛效度和区分效度以及模型拟合度。在研究3中,我们对155对领导-下属二元组进行了多源实地研究,重复了CFA,并额外评估了与标准相关的效度。结果表明,ALBS是一种简洁有效的评估适应性领导行为的工具,从而为扩展我们对动态环境中领导力的前因、机制和后果的理解奠定了基础。