Suppr超能文献

术前营养筛查工具在成人营养不良诊断中的准确性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Diagnostic test accuracy of preoperative nutritional screening tools in adults for malnutrition: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2024 Feb 1;110(2):1090-1098. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000845.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Good nutritional screening tests can triage malnourished patients for further assessment and management by dietitians before surgery to reduce the risk of postoperative complications. The authors assessed the diagnostic test accuracy of common nutritional screening tools for preoperative malnutrition in adults undergoing surgery and determined which test had the highest accuracy.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science were searched for relevant titles with no language restriction from inception till 1 January 2023. Studies reporting on the diagnostic test accuracy of preoperative malnutrition in adults using one or more of the following index nutritional screening tools were included: Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), short-form Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA-SF), Nutritional Risk Index (NRI), Nutrition Risk Screening Tool 2002 (NRS-2002), and Preoperative Nutrition Screening (PONS). The reference standard was the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) before surgery. Random-effects bivariate binomial model meta-analyses, meta-regressions, and a network meta-analysis were used to estimate the pooled and relative sensitivities and specificities.

RESULTS

Of the 16 included studies (5695 participants with an 11 957 index and 11 957 SGA tests), all were conducted after hospital admission before surgery. Eleven studies ( n =3896) were at high risk of bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool due to a lack of blinded assessments. MUST had the highest overall test accuracy performance (sensitivity 86%, 95% CI: 75-93%; specificity 89%, 95% CI: 83-93%). Network meta-analysis showed NRI had similar relative sensitivity (0.93, 95% CI: 0.77-1.13) but lower relative specificity (0.75, 95% CI: 0.61-0.92) than MUST.

CONCLUSIONS

Of all easy-to-use tests applicable at the bedside, MUST had the highest test accuracy performance for screening preoperative malnutrition. However, its predictive accuracy is likely insufficient to justify the application of nutritional optimization interventions without additional assessments.

摘要

背景

良好的营养筛查测试可以对术前营养不良的患者进行分类,以便营养师进一步评估和管理,从而降低术后并发症的风险。作者评估了常用于术前营养不良筛查的几种营养筛查工具在接受手术的成年人中的诊断准确性,并确定了哪种测试的准确性最高。

方法

无语言限制地从建库起至 2023 年 1 月 1 日,在 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 Web of Science 中检索了相关标题。纳入了使用以下一种或多种术前成人营养不良指数营养筛查工具报告诊断准确性的研究:营养不良筛查工具(MST)、营养不良普遍筛查工具(MUST)、微型营养评估(MNA)、简易微型营养评估(MNA-SF)、营养风险指数(NRI)、营养风险筛查 2002 工具(NRS-2002)和术前营养筛查(PONS)。参考标准是术前的主观整体评估(SGA)。使用双变量二项式模型的随机效应荟萃分析、荟萃回归和网络荟萃分析来估计汇总和相对敏感性和特异性。

结果

在纳入的 16 项研究中(5695 名参与者,有 11957 个指数和 11957 个 SGA 测试),所有研究均在住院后术前进行。由于缺乏盲法评估,11 项研究(n=3896)使用诊断准确性研究质量评估工具存在高偏倚风险。MUST 的整体测试准确性最高(敏感性 86%,95%CI:75-93%;特异性 89%,95%CI:83-93%)。网络荟萃分析显示,NRI 的相对敏感性相似(0.93,95%CI:0.77-1.13),但相对特异性较低(0.75,95%CI:0.61-0.92)。

结论

在所有易于床边使用的测试中,MUST 对术前营养不良的筛查具有最高的测试准确性。然而,其预测准确性可能不足以证明在没有额外评估的情况下应用营养优化干预措施是合理的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00cd/10871615/6f4e33425ee1/js9-110-1090-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验