Suppr超能文献

中药复方制剂联合常规疗法治疗白癜风的疗效和安全性:贝叶斯网状 Meta 分析。

Efficacy and safety of Chinese patent medicine compound preparation combined with routine treatment in vitiligo: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, Shandong, China.

Jining Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jining, Shandong, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Oct 13;102(41):e35327. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035327.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Treating vitiligo in clinical practice is challenging. Furthermore, oral drugs used in Western medicine have considerable side effects and are unsuitable for long-term treatment. In contrast, Chinese patent medicines (CPMs) are more suitable for long-term oral vitiligo treatment, but medical evidence of their efficacy and safety is lacking. Therefore, in this study, the efficacy and safety of CPMs were evaluated and ranked using a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

METHODS

Seven Chinese and English databases were searched for all relevant articles published up to February 2023. The Bayesian network meta-analysis method was used to analyze the extracted data to evaluate efficacy and safety.

RESULTS

Six common CPMs for treating vitiligo were selected in our study, and 48 targeted articles and 4446 patients were included. This study showed that Qubai Babuqi tablets (QT) were the most effective for short-term treatment of vitiligo, and that vitiligo capsules or pills (VCP) were the most effective for long-term treatment, together with compound Quchong Banjiuju pills (QP). In terms of surface area under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values, the order of efficacy of each treatment was as follows: QT (92.18%) > Taohong Qingxue pills (TP) (63.81%) > VCP (55.53%) > QP (50.72%) > Bailing tablets or capsules (BTC) (49.01%) > Baishi pills (BP) (35.69%)>routine therapy (RT) (3.1%) in terms of total effective rate and QT (92.05%) > VCP (71.50%) > QP (66.60%) > TP (42.95%) > BTC (39.66%) > BP (36.60%)>RT (0.6%) in terms of improvement rate. In addition, the safety of the 6 CPMs did not significantly differ in terms of adverse effects. The SUCRA values indicated that QT performed slightly worse than other drugs.

DISCUSSION

In treating vitiligo, QT is most effective but only suitable for short-term administration owing to its poor safety. VCP and QP could be used as first-choice long-term medications. TP may positively affect repigmentation in patients with limited lesion areas.

摘要

背景与目的

临床治疗白癜风具有挑战性。此外,西医中使用的口服药物副作用较大,不适合长期治疗。相比之下,中成药(CPM)更适合长期口服治疗白癜风,但缺乏疗效和安全性的医学证据。因此,本研究采用贝叶斯网络荟萃分析方法评估和排名 CPM 的疗效和安全性。

方法

检索了截至 2023 年 2 月所有相关的中文和英文数据库,提取数据并采用贝叶斯网络荟萃分析方法进行分析,以评估疗效和安全性。

结果

本研究共纳入 6 种治疗白癜风的常用 CPM,涉及 48 项针对性研究和 4446 例患者。研究结果表明,短期治疗白癜风,曲比布齐片(QT)疗效最佳;长期治疗白癜风,白癜风胶囊或丸剂(VCP)和复方驱白巴布期片(QP)疗效最佳。基于累积排序概率曲线下面积(SUCRA)值,每种治疗方法的疗效排序如下:QT(92.18%)>桃红清血丸(TP)(63.81%)>VCP(55.53%)>QP(50.72%)>百灵片或胶囊(BTC)(49.01%)>白蚀丸(BP)(35.69%)>常规治疗(RT)(3.1%)(总有效率)和 QT(92.05%)>VCP(71.50%)>QP(66.60%)>TP(42.95%)>BTC(39.66%)>BP(36.60%)>RT(0.6%)(改善率)。此外,6 种 CPM 在不良反应方面安全性无显著差异。SUCRA 值表明 QT 的表现略逊于其他药物。

讨论

治疗白癜风时,QT 虽然疗效最佳,但由于安全性较差,仅适合短期给药。VCP 和 QP 可作为长期治疗的首选药物。TP 可能对皮损面积较小的患者的复色有积极影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/feff/10578774/a9f7ceb5cf31/medi-102-e35327-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验