Suppr超能文献

同时进行力量和耐力训练:对性别和训练状态影响的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Concurrent Strength and Endurance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Impact of Sex and Training Status.

机构信息

Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Sports Med. 2024 Feb;54(2):485-503. doi: 10.1007/s40279-023-01943-9. Epub 2023 Oct 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many sports require maximal strength and endurance performance. Concurrent strength and endurance training can lead to suboptimal training adaptations. However, how adaptations differ between males and females is currently unknown. Additionally, current training status may affect training adaptations.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess sex-specific differences in adaptations in strength, power, muscle hypertrophy, and maximal oxygen consumption ( O) to concurrent strength and endurance training in healthy adults. Second, we investigated how training adaptations are influenced by strength and endurance training status.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, and a Cochrane risk of bias was evaluated. ISI Web of science, PubMed/MEDLINE, and SPORTDiscus databases were searched using the following inclusion criteria: healthy adults aged 18-50 years, intervention period of ≥ 4 weeks, and outcome measures were defined as upper- and lower-body strength, power, hypertrophy, and/or O. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model and reported in standardized mean differences.

RESULTS

In total, 59 studies with 1346 participants were included. Concurrent training showed blunted lower-body strength adaptations in males, but not in females (male: - 0.43, 95% confidence interval [- 0.64 to - 0.22], female: 0.08 [- 0.34 to 0.49], group difference: P = 0.03). No sex differences were observed for changes in upper-body strength (P = 0.67), power (P = 0.37), or O (P = 0.13). Data on muscle hypertrophy were insufficient to draw any conclusions. For training status, untrained but not trained or highly trained endurance athletes displayed lower O gains with concurrent training (P = 0.04). For other outcomes, no differences were found between untrained and trained individuals, both for strength and endurance training status.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent training results in small interference for lower-body strength adaptations in males, but not in females. Untrained, but not trained or highly trained endurance athletes demonstrated impaired improvements in O following concurrent training. More studies on females and highly strength-trained and endurance-trained athletes are warranted.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42022370894.

摘要

背景

许多运动都需要最大力量和耐力表现。同时进行力量和耐力训练可能会导致训练适应不佳。然而,目前尚不清楚男性和女性之间的适应有何不同。此外,当前的训练状态可能会影响训练适应。

目的

我们旨在评估健康成年人同时进行力量和耐力训练时,力量、功率、肌肉肥大和最大摄氧量( O)的适应方面的性别特异性差异。其次,我们研究了训练适应如何受到力量和耐力训练状态的影响。

方法

根据 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南进行系统评价和荟萃分析,并评估 Cochrane 风险偏倚。使用以下纳入标准在 ISI Web of Science、PubMed/MEDLINE 和 SPORTDiscus 数据库中进行搜索:年龄在 18-50 岁之间的健康成年人,干预期≥4 周,以及定义为上下肢力量、功率、肥大和/或 O 的结果测量。使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,并以标准化均数差报告。

结果

共有 59 项研究,涉及 1346 名参与者。在男性中,同时训练导致下肢力量适应减弱,但在女性中则没有(男性:-0.43,95%置信区间[-0.64 至-0.22],女性:0.08[-0.34 至 0.49],组间差异:P=0.03)。在上下肢力量变化方面未观察到性别差异(P=0.67)、功率(P=0.37)或 O(P=0.13)。关于肌肉肥大的数据不足以得出任何结论。对于训练状态,未受过训练的耐力运动员,而不是受过训练或高度训练的耐力运动员,在同时进行训练时, O 的增益较低(P=0.04)。对于其他结果,未在未受过训练和受过训练的个体之间发现差异,无论是力量还是耐力训练状态。

结论

同时训练导致男性下肢力量适应略有干扰,但对女性则没有。未受过训练的耐力运动员,而不是受过训练或高度训练的耐力运动员,在同时进行训练时, O 的改善受损。需要对女性以及高度力量和耐力训练的运动员进行更多的研究。

临床试验注册

PROSPERO:CRD42022370894。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbc2/10933151/dd3ec6e7f6ea/40279_2023_1943_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验