Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine.
Changzheng Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University.
Int J Surg. 2024 Jan 1;110(1):419-430. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000837.
Patients with spinal metastases (SM) suffer from a significant quality of life (QoL) deterioration. The measurement of QoL has garnered significant attention. In this study, the authors aimed to investigate the frequency of QoL measurement, systematically appraise the measurement properties of identified instruments, and facilitate the effective selection of an appropriate QoL instrument for patients with SM.
This systematic review adhered to the newly revised Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement guidelines. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. Measurement property results were assessed using the adapted criteria. Each measurement property was allocated a separate rating (excellent, good, fair, or poor). 'Best evidence synthesis' was performed using COSMIN outcomes and the quality of findings.
Two hundred and nine publications were included, and 18 instruments were identified. ECOG, EuroQol-5D, SF-36, SOSGOQ, and EORTC-QLQ-C30 were the top five instruments used for patients with SM in published literature. The measurement properties evaluated included internal consistency (four instruments), reliability (three instruments), validity (five instruments), validity (nine measures), floor and ceiling effects (four instruments), responsiveness (four instruments), and interpretability (three measures). Based on the limited evidence, the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) had the best methodological quality.
Owing to the limitations of BPI in assessment domains, we cannot fully support the use of BPI. For the lack of high-quality research, it is challenging to nominate a single appropriate measure. Additional studies are needed to explore the evidence before a confirmatory decision is made.
患有脊柱转移瘤(SM)的患者生活质量(QoL)显著下降。因此 QoL 的测量受到了广泛关注。本研究旨在调查 QoL 测量的频率,系统评估已确定工具的测量特性,并为 SM 患者有效选择合适的 QoL 工具提供便利。
本系统评价遵循新修订的系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)声明指南。使用共识基础的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)清单评估研究的方法学质量。使用改编的标准评估测量特性结果。为每个测量特性分配一个单独的评级(优秀、良好、中等或差)。使用 COSMIN 结果和研究结果的质量进行“最佳证据综合”。
共纳入 209 篇文献,确定了 18 种工具。在已发表的文献中,ECOG、EuroQol-5D、SF-36、SOSGOQ 和 EORTC-QLQ-C30 是用于 SM 患者的前五种工具。评估的测量特性包括内部一致性(四种工具)、可靠性(三种工具)、有效性(五种工具)、反应度(四种工具)和可解释性(三种工具)。基于有限的证据,简短疼痛量表(BPI)具有最佳的方法学质量。
由于 BPI 在评估领域的局限性,我们不能完全支持 BPI 的使用。由于高质量研究的缺乏,难以提名单一合适的措施。需要进一步的研究来探索证据,然后再做出确认性决定。