• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

遗传性疾病基因检测中不确定意义变异的发生率和分类。

Rates and Classification of Variants of Uncertain Significance in Hereditary Disease Genetic Testing.

机构信息

Invitae Corporation, San Francisco, California.

Division of Clinical Genetics, Departments of Pediatrics and Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2339571. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.39571.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.39571
PMID:37878314
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10600581/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) are rampant in clinical genetic testing, frustrating clinicians, patients, and laboratories because the uncertainty hinders diagnoses and clinical management. A comprehensive assessment of VUSs across many disease genes is needed to guide efforts to reduce uncertainty.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the sources, gene distribution, and population-level attributes of VUSs and to evaluate the impact of the different types of evidence used to reclassify them.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used germline DNA variant data from individuals referred by clinicians for diagnostic genetic testing for hereditary disorders. Participants included individuals for whom gene panel testing was conducted between September 9, 2014, and September 7, 2022. Data were analyzed from September 1, 2022, to April 1, 2023.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The outcomes of interest were VUS rates (stratified by age; clinician-reported race, ethnicity, and ancestry groups; types of gene panels; and variant attributes), percentage of VUSs reclassified as benign or likely benign vs pathogenic or likely pathogenic, and enrichment of evidence types used for reclassifying VUSs.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 1 689 845 individuals ranging in age from 0 to 89 years at time of testing (median age, 50 years), with 1 203 210 (71.2%) female individuals. There were 39 150 Ashkenazi Jewish individuals (2.3%), 64 730 Asian individuals (3.8%), 126 739 Black individuals (7.5%), 5539 French Canadian individuals (0.3%), 169 714 Hispanic individuals (10.0%), 5058 Native American individuals (0.3%), 2696 Pacific Islander individuals (0.2%), 4842 Sephardic Jewish individuals (0.3%), and 974 383 White individuals (57.7%). Among all individuals tested, 692 227 (41.0%) had at least 1 VUS and 535 385 (31.7%) had only VUS results. The number of VUSs per individual increased as more genes were tested, and most VUSs were missense changes (86.6%). More VUSs were observed per sequenced gene in individuals who were not from a European White population, in middle-aged and older adults, and in individuals who underwent testing for disorders with incomplete penetrance. Of 37 699 unique VUSs that were reclassified, 30 239 (80.2%) were ultimately categorized as benign or likely benign. A mean (SD) of 30.7 (20.0) months elapsed for VUSs to be reclassified to benign or likely benign, and a mean (SD) of 22.4 (18.9) months elapsed for VUSs to be reclassified to pathogenic or likely pathogenic. Clinical evidence contributed most to reclassification.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cohort study of approximately 1.6 million individuals highlighted the need for better methods for interpreting missense variants, increased availability of clinical and experimental evidence for variant classification, and more diverse representation of race, ethnicity, and ancestry groups in genomic databases. Data from this study could provide a sound basis for understanding the sources and resolution of VUSs and navigating appropriate next steps in patient care.

摘要

重要性

变异不确定性 (VUS) 在临床基因检测中非常普遍,这让临床医生、患者和实验室感到沮丧,因为这种不确定性阻碍了诊断和临床管理。需要对许多疾病基因的 VUS 进行全面评估,以指导减少不确定性的努力。

目的

描述 VUS 的来源、基因分布和人群属性,并评估用于重新分类它们的不同类型证据的影响。

设计、设置和参与者:这项队列研究使用了临床医生为遗传性疾病进行诊断基因检测而推荐的个体的种系 DNA 变异数据。参与者包括在 2014 年 9 月 9 日至 2022 年 9 月 7 日期间进行基因小组检测的个体。数据分析于 2022 年 9 月 1 日至 2023 年 4 月 1 日进行。

主要结果和措施

感兴趣的结果是 VUS 率(按年龄分层;临床医生报告的种族、民族和祖裔群体;基因小组的类型;和变体属性)、VUS 重新分类为良性或可能良性与致病性或可能致病性的百分比,以及用于重新分类 VUS 的证据类型的富集。

结果

该研究队列包括 1689845 名年龄在 0 至 89 岁之间的个体(中位数年龄为 50 岁),其中 1203210 名(71.2%)为女性。有 39150 名阿什肯纳兹犹太人(2.3%)、64730 名亚洲人(3.8%)、126739 名黑人(7.5%)、5539 名法裔加拿大人(0.3%)、169714 名西班牙裔人(10.0%)、5058 名美洲原住民(0.3%)、2696 名太平洋岛民(0.2%)、4842 名塞法迪犹太人(0.3%)和 974383 名白人(57.7%)。在所有接受测试的个体中,692227 名(41.0%)至少有 1 个 VUS,535385 名(31.7%)仅有 VUS 结果。随着测试基因数量的增加,个体的 VUS 数量增加,大多数 VUS 是错义变化(86.6%)。在非欧洲白人、中老年人和接受不完全外显率疾病检测的个体中,每个测序基因观察到的 VUS 更多。在 37699 个独特的 VUS 中,有 30239 个(80.2%)最终被归类为良性或可能良性。VUS 重新分类为良性或可能良性需要平均(SD)30.7(20.0)个月,VUS 重新分类为致病性或可能致病性需要平均(SD)22.4(18.9)个月。临床证据对重新分类的贡献最大。

结论和相关性

这项对约 160 万人的队列研究强调了需要更好的方法来解释错义变异,增加用于变异分类的临床和实验证据的可用性,以及在基因组数据库中增加种族、民族和祖裔群体的代表性。这项研究的数据可以为理解 VUS 的来源和解决方法以及指导患者护理的适当下一步提供坚实的基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7656/10600581/458f49cf4148/jamanetwopen-e2339571-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7656/10600581/420b773ab0ec/jamanetwopen-e2339571-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7656/10600581/37af05b957b2/jamanetwopen-e2339571-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7656/10600581/1c899c782221/jamanetwopen-e2339571-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7656/10600581/458f49cf4148/jamanetwopen-e2339571-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7656/10600581/420b773ab0ec/jamanetwopen-e2339571-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7656/10600581/37af05b957b2/jamanetwopen-e2339571-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7656/10600581/1c899c782221/jamanetwopen-e2339571-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7656/10600581/458f49cf4148/jamanetwopen-e2339571-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Rates and Classification of Variants of Uncertain Significance in Hereditary Disease Genetic Testing.遗传性疾病基因检测中不确定意义变异的发生率和分类。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2339571. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.39571.
2
Diagnostic Outcomes of Concurrent DNA and RNA Sequencing in Individuals Undergoing Hereditary Cancer Testing.个体接受遗传性癌症检测时同时进行 DNA 和 RNA 测序的诊断结果。
JAMA Oncol. 2024 Feb 1;10(2):212-219. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.5586.
3
Prevalence of Variant Reclassification Following Hereditary Cancer Genetic Testing.遗传性癌症基因检测后变异再分类的流行率。
JAMA. 2018 Sep 25;320(12):1266-1274. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13152.
4
Rates of Influenza-Associated Hospitalization, Intensive Care Unit Admission, and In-Hospital Death by Race and Ethnicity in the United States From 2009 to 2019.2009 年至 2019 年美国按种族和族裔划分的流感相关住院率、重症监护病房入院率和住院死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2121880. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21880.
5
Inequities in multi-gene hereditary cancer testing: lower diagnostic yield and higher VUS rate in individuals who identify as Hispanic, African or Asian and Pacific Islander as compared to European.多基因遗传性癌症检测中的不平等现象:与欧洲人相比,自认为是西班牙裔、非裔或亚太裔的个体的诊断产量较低,VUS 率较高。
Fam Cancer. 2019 Oct;18(4):465-469. doi: 10.1007/s10689-019-00144-6.
6
A Retrospective Review of Reclassification of Variants of Uncertain Significance in a Pediatric Epilepsy Cohort Undergoing Genetic Panel Testing.对接受基因检测的小儿癫痫队列中意义未明变异重新分类的回顾性研究
Pediatr Neurol. 2024 Dec;161:101-107. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2024.09.009. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
7
Ethnic disparities among men with prostate cancer undergoing germline testing.男性前列腺癌患者进行种系检测的种族差异。
Urol Oncol. 2020 Mar;38(3):80.e1-80.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.09.010. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
8
Spectrum of splicing variants in disease genes and the ability of RNA analysis to reduce uncertainty in clinical interpretation.疾病基因中剪接变异的谱与 RNA 分析减少临床解读不确定性的能力。
Am J Hum Genet. 2021 Apr 1;108(4):696-708. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.03.006. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
Racial and ethnic variation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic test results among individuals referred for genetic counseling at a large urban comprehensive cancer center.在一家大型城市综合癌症中心接受遗传咨询的个体中,BRCA1和BRCA2基因检测结果的种族和民族差异。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Feb;34(2):141-149. doi: 10.1007/s10552-022-01648-w. Epub 2022 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer spectrum in Mexican patients with the CHEK2 p.(Leu236Pro) variant: a retrospective study.墨西哥携带CHEK2基因p.(Leu236Pro)变异患者的癌症谱:一项回顾性研究。
Fam Cancer. 2025 Sep 17;24(4):73. doi: 10.1007/s10689-025-00490-8.
2
Multi-class machine learning-based classification of SCID-related genetic variants.基于多类机器学习的重症联合免疫缺陷相关基因变异分类
Immunol Res. 2025 Sep 11;73(1):129. doi: 10.1007/s12026-025-09685-8.
3
Adult onset cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome due to germline missense mutation in in a previously healthy middle-aged woman.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic Testing and Other Healthcare Use by Black and White Individuals in a Genomic Sequencing Study.在一项基因组测序研究中,黑人和白人个体的基因检测和其他医疗保健使用情况。
Public Health Genomics. 2023;26(1):90-102. doi: 10.1159/000533356. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
2
Applications of artificial intelligence in clinical laboratory genomics.人工智能在临床实验室基因组学中的应用。
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2023 Sep;193(3):e32057. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.32057. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
3
Calibration of computational tools for missense variant pathogenicity classification and ClinGen recommendations for PP3/BP4 criteria.
一名既往健康的中年女性因种系错义突变导致成人起病的冷吡啉相关周期性综合征 。
Front Immunol. 2025 Aug 25;16:1652177. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1652177. eCollection 2025.
4
Variant classification of hereditary cancer genes is affected by genomic underrepresentation of admixed populations.混合人群的基因组代表性不足会影响遗传性癌症基因的变异分类。
Mol Genet Genomics. 2025 Sep 3;300(1):86. doi: 10.1007/s00438-025-02295-x.
5
Optimizing gene prioritization for clinical diagnosis of metabolic genetic disorders.优化代谢性遗传疾病临床诊断中的基因优先级排序
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 29;20(8):e0331038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331038. eCollection 2025.
6
Evaluating Liquid Biopsy for Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) Detection as a Complementary Diagnostic Tool in Thyroid Cancer Among Ecuadorian Women.评估液体活检检测循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)作为厄瓜多尔女性甲状腺癌辅助诊断工具的价值。
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jul 21;26(14):6987. doi: 10.3390/ijms26146987.
7
Multiplexed assays of variant effect for clinical variant interpretation.用于临床变异解读的变异效应多重检测。
Nat Rev Genet. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1038/s41576-025-00870-x.
8
Cytokine signaling defects in primary atopic diseases-an updated review.原发性特应性疾病中的细胞因子信号传导缺陷——最新综述
Front Allergy. 2025 Jul 1;6:1617714. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2025.1617714. eCollection 2025.
9
Dynamicasome-a molecular dynamics-guided and AI-driven pathogenicity prediction catalogue for all genetic mutations.动力体组——一个由分子动力学引导并由人工智能驱动的针对所有基因突变的致病性预测目录。
Commun Biol. 2025 Jul 7;8(1):958. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-08334-y.
10
Genetics Evaluation Outcomes From an Academic Multidisciplinary Atypical Diabetes Program.来自学术性多学科非典型糖尿病项目的遗传学评估结果
J Endocr Soc. 2025 Jun 5;9(8):bvaf091. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvaf091. eCollection 2025 Aug.
计算工具的校准用于错义变异致病性分类和 ClinGen 对 PP3/BP4 标准的建议。
Am J Hum Genet. 2022 Dec 1;109(12):2163-2177. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.10.013. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
4
Disparities in cancer genetics care by race/ethnicity among pan-cancer patients with pathogenic germline variants.泛癌种携带致病变异体种系变异患者的种族/民族差异与癌症遗传学护理。
Cancer. 2022 Nov 1;128(21):3870-3879. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34434. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
5
Experiences of individuals with a variant of uncertain significance on genetic testing for hereditary cancer risks: a mixed method systematic review.遗传性癌症风险基因检测中意义未明变异个体的经历:一项混合方法的系统评价
J Community Genet. 2022 Aug;13(4):371-379. doi: 10.1007/s12687-022-00600-4. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
6
Interpreting protein variant effects with computational predictors and deep mutational scanning.用计算预测器和深度突变扫描来解释蛋白质变异的影响。
Dis Model Mech. 2022 Jun 1;15(6). doi: 10.1242/dmm.049510. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
7
Germline Variant Spectrum Among African American Men Undergoing Prostate Cancer Germline Testing: Need for Equity in Genetic Testing.进行前列腺癌种系检测的非裔美国男性中的种系变异谱:基因检测中的公平性需求。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2022 May;6(1):e2200234. doi: 10.1200/PO.22.00234.
8
Is there a way to reduce the inequity in variant interpretation on the basis of ancestry?是否有一种方法可以减少基于祖先的变异解释中的不平等?
Am J Hum Genet. 2022 Jun 2;109(6):981-988. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.04.012.
9
Cancer patients' understandings of genetic variants of uncertain significance in clinical care.癌症患者对临床护理中意义未明的基因变异的理解。
J Community Genet. 2022 Aug;13(4):381-388. doi: 10.1007/s12687-022-00594-z. Epub 2022 May 26.
10
Systematic use of phenotype evidence in clinical genetic testing reduces the frequency of variants of uncertain significance.在临床基因检测中系统地使用表型证据可降低不确定意义变异的频率。
Am J Med Genet A. 2022 Sep;188(9):2642-2651. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62779. Epub 2022 May 16.