Suppr超能文献

重症监护病房中的氯胺酮镇静:一项对加拿大重症监护医生的调查。

Ketamine sedation in the intensive care unit: a survey of Canadian intensivists.

作者信息

Sharif Sameer, Munshi Laveena, Burry Lisa, Mehta Sangeeta, Gray Sara, Chaudhuri Dipayan, Duffett Mark, Siemieniuk Reed A, Rochwerg Bram

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 2024 Jan;71(1):118-126. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02608-x. Epub 2023 Oct 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We sought to understand the beliefs and practices of Canadian intensivists regarding their use of ketamine as a sedative in critically ill patients and to gauge their interest in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) examining its use in the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

We designed and validated an electronic self-administered survey examining the use of ketamine as a sedative infusion for ICU patients. We surveyed 400 physician members of the Canadian Critical Care Society (CCCS) via email between February and April 2022 and sent three reminders at two-week intervals. The survey was redistributed in January 2023 to improve the response rate.

RESULTS

We received 87/400 (22%) completed questionnaires. Most respondents reported they rarely use ketamine as a continuous infusion for sedation or analgesia in the ICU (52/87, 58%). Physicians reported the following conditions would make them more likely to use ketamine: asthma exacerbation (73/87, 82%), tolerance to opioids (68/87, 77%), status epilepticus (44/87, 50%), and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (33/87, 38%). Concern for side-effects that limited respondents' use of ketamine include adverse psychotropic effects (61/87, 69%) and delirium (47/87, 53%). The majority of respondents agreed there is need for an RCT to evaluate ketamine as a sedative infusion in the ICU (62/87, 71%).

CONCLUSION

This survey of Canadian intensivists illustrates that use of ketamine as a continuous infusion for sedation is limited, and is at least partly driven by concerns of adverse psychotropic effects. Canadian physicians endorse the need for a trial investigating the safety and efficacy of ketamine as a sedative for critically ill patients.

摘要

目的

我们试图了解加拿大重症医学专家在危重症患者中使用氯胺酮作为镇静剂的观念和做法,并评估他们对一项研究其在重症监护病房(ICU)使用情况的随机对照试验(RCT)的兴趣。

方法

我们设计并验证了一项电子自填式调查问卷,以调查氯胺酮作为ICU患者镇静输注药物的使用情况。2022年2月至4月期间,我们通过电子邮件对400名加拿大重症医学会(CCCS)的医生会员进行了调查,并每隔两周发送三次提醒。2023年1月重新发放了调查问卷,以提高回复率。

结果

我们收到了87份/400份(22%)完整的问卷。大多数受访者表示,他们在ICU中很少将氯胺酮作为持续输注进行镇静或镇痛(52/87,58%)。医生们报告说,以下情况会使他们更有可能使用氯胺酮:哮喘加重(73/87,82%)、对阿片类药物耐受(68/87,77%)、癫痫持续状态(44/87,50%)和严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征(33/87,38%)。限制受访者使用氯胺酮的副作用担忧包括不良精神效应(61/87,69%)和谵妄(47/87,53%)。大多数受访者同意需要进行一项RCT来评估氯胺酮作为ICU镇静输注药物的效果(62/87,71%)。

结论

这项对加拿大重症医学专家的调查表明,氯胺酮作为持续输注进行镇静的使用有限,并且至少部分是由对不良精神效应的担忧所驱动。加拿大医生认可需要进行一项试验,以研究氯胺酮作为危重症患者镇静剂的安全性和有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验