Suppr超能文献

系统评价和批判性分析纵向研究电子烟对青少年从未吸烟者吸烟起始影响。

Systematic Review and Critical Analysis of Longitudinal Studies Assessing Effect of E-Cigarettes on Cigarette Initiation among Adolescent Never-Smokers.

机构信息

Sorbonne Université & ex CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière (APHP), 14 Avenue Bosquet, 75007 Paris, France.

Institut Arthur Vernes, Tabacologie, 75006 Paris, France.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Oct 18;20(20):6936. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20206936.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Prospective longitudinal studies mainly conclude on a causal role of e-cigarettes in the initiation of cigarettes in flagrant contradiction with conclusions drawn from epidemiology and other studies showing a sharp decline in cigarette use in parallel with the spread of e-cigarette use. This systematic review explores the reasons for this discrepancy.

METHODS

Among 84 publications on e-cigarette/cigarette association in adolescents identified in the Medline database from 2011 to 2022, 23 concern 22 never-smoker longitudinal sub-cohorts.

RESULTS

A link between e-cigarette experimentation at T1 and cigarette initiation at T2 is reported in sub-cohort analyses of never-smokers (AOR: 1.41 to 8.30). However, studies exclude 64.3% of T1 e-cigarette experimenters (because of dual-use) and 74.1% of T2 cigarette experimenters. With this study design, e-cigarettes contribute only to 5.3% of T2 cigarette experimentation, casting major doubt on the external validity of results and authors' conclusions that e-cigarettes have a significant effect on the initiation of cigarettes () at the population level. This sub-cohort design prohibits highlighting any , which is the most likely mechanism accounting for the competition between these two products.

CONCLUSIONS

While nicotine abstinence remains the best medical option, over-regulation of e-cigarettes because of misinterpretation of longitudinal study results may be detrimental to public health and tobacco control.

摘要

未加标签

主要的前瞻性纵向研究得出电子烟在香烟初始使用中起因果作用的结论,这与从流行病学和其他研究中得出的结论相矛盾,这些研究表明随着电子烟使用的普及,香烟使用急剧下降。本系统评价探讨了出现这种差异的原因。

方法

在 2011 年至 2022 年期间从 Medline 数据库中确定的 84 篇关于青少年电子烟/香烟关联的出版物中,有 23 篇涉及 22 个从不吸烟的纵向亚队列。

结果

在从不吸烟的亚队列分析中,报告了 T1 电子烟实验与 T2 香烟起始之间的联系(AOR:1.41 至 8.30)。然而,这些研究排除了 64.3%的 T1 电子烟实验者(因为双重使用)和 74.1%的 T2 香烟实验者。采用这种研究设计,电子烟仅导致 5.3%的 T2 香烟实验,这对结果的外部有效性和作者关于电子烟对香烟起始具有重大影响的结论提出了重大质疑()在人群层面上。这种亚队列设计禁止强调任何可能的机制,这是这两种产品竞争的最可能机制。

结论

虽然尼古丁戒断仍然是最好的医学选择,但由于对纵向研究结果的误解而对电子烟进行过度监管可能对公共卫生和烟草控制有害。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f12/10606427/67a7cf820059/ijerph-20-06936-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验