Suppr超能文献

质疑念珠菌血症治疗持续时间的 14 天教条。

Questioning the 14-day dogma in candidemia treatment duration.

机构信息

Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Institute of Translational Research, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD) and Excellence Center for Medical Mycology (ECMM), University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Mycoses. 2024 Jan;67(1):e13672. doi: 10.1111/myc.13672. Epub 2023 Nov 3.

Abstract

The growing threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global concern. With AMR directly causing 1.27 million deaths in 2019 and projections of up to 10 million annual deaths by 2050, optimising infectious disease treatments is imperative. Prudent antimicrobial use, including treatment duration, can mitigate AMR emergence. This is particularly critical in candidemia, a severe condition with a 45% crude mortality rate, as the 14-day minimum treatment period has not been challenged in randomised comparison. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in August 2023, revealing seven original articles and two case series discussing treatment durations of less than 14 days for candidemia. No interventional trials or prospective observational studies assessing shorter durations were found. Historical studies showed varying candidemia treatment durations, questioning the current 14-day minimum recommendation. Recent research observed no significant survival differences between patients receiving shorter or longer treatment, emphasising the need for evidence-based guidance. Treatment duration reduction post-blood culture clearance could decrease exposure to antifungal drugs, limiting selection pressure, especially in the context of emerging multiresistant Candida species. Candidemia's complexity, emerging resistance and potential for shorter in-hospital stays underscore the urgency of refining treatment strategies. Evidence-driven candidemia treatment durations are imperative to balance efficacy with resistance prevention and ensure the longevity of antifungal therapies. Further research and clinical trials are needed to establish evidence-based guidelines for candidemia treatment duration.

摘要

日益严重的抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)威胁是一个全球性问题。据估计,2019 年 AMR 直接导致 127 万人死亡,到 2050 年,这一数字可能上升至每年 1000 万人,因此优化传染病治疗方法至关重要。合理使用抗菌药物,包括治疗持续时间,可以减轻 AMR 的出现。在念珠菌血症这种严重疾病中,这一点尤为关键,因为其粗死亡率高达 45%,且目前还没有临床试验挑战 14 天的最短治疗时间。我们于 2023 年 8 月进行了全面的文献检索,共发现了 7 篇原始文章和 2 篇病例系列研究,讨论了念珠菌血症治疗时间少于 14 天的情况。但没有发现评估更短治疗时间的干预性试验或前瞻性观察性研究。历史研究显示,念珠菌血症的治疗持续时间存在差异,这对目前 14 天的最短推荐时间提出了质疑。最近的研究观察到,接受较短或较长治疗的患者之间的生存差异没有统计学意义,这强调了需要有基于证据的指导。在血培养转阴后减少治疗时间可以减少接触抗真菌药物的机会,限制选择压力,尤其是在新兴的多耐药念珠菌物种的情况下。念珠菌血症的复杂性、不断出现的耐药性以及住院时间缩短的可能性,突显了完善治疗策略的紧迫性。减少念珠菌血症的治疗时间需要平衡疗效和耐药性预防,以确保抗真菌治疗的持久性。需要进一步的研究和临床试验来为念珠菌血症的治疗持续时间制定基于证据的指南。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验