Suppr超能文献

肝素诱导血小板聚集与血清素释放试验的性能评估。

Performance evaluation of heparin-induced platelet aggregation vs serotonin release assay.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, US.

Department of Pathology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, US.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 2024 Feb 1;161(2):122-129. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqad117.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a rare but life-threatening condition that requires rapid diagnosis for proper management. Laboratory testing should only be performed on patients with intermediate- or high-risk pretest probability. The platelet factor 4 (PF4) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is the screening test that should be confirmed by higher specificity testing such as the heparin-induced platelet aggregation (HIPA) or the serotonin release assay (SRA). This study aims to evaluate the performance of the HIPA in comparison to the SRA, establish cutoffs of the PF4 ELISA to predict positivity for HIPA/SRA, and study the mortality rate between patients with suspected HIT confirmed as HIT positive vs negative.

METHODS

All positive PF4 ELISA cases with confirmatory HIPA and SRA testing were included. As the SRA was considered the gold standard, the HIPA performance was evaluated in comparison to SRA before and after the implementation of a new standardized interpretation guide in 2022. The mortality of these cases was also documented by chart reviews.

RESULTS

In total, 232 cases with positive or indeterminate anti-PF4 IgG ELISA had confirmatory testing with HIPA and SRA. The sensitivity of the HIPA improved from 55.4% in 2018 to 2021 to 73.8% in 2022. The specificity remained similarly high in 2018 to 2021 vs 2022 (94.9% vs 87.5%). The negative predictive value (NPV) improved in 2022. The PF4 optical density cutoff to predict the positivity of SRA was 0.85 vs 1.47 to predict the positivity of HIPA but decreased to 0.83 when combining HIPA and/or SRA. There was no significant difference in mortality between patients with suspected HIT confirmed positive vs negative.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the HIPA has a lower sensitivity than the SRA, the new standardized interpretation guide improved its sensitivity and NPV in 2022. Future improvements are needed to use the HIPA as a stand-alone confirmatory test with the goal to shorten hospital length of stay and expedite proper anticoagulation management.

摘要

目的

肝素诱导的血小板减少症(HIT)是一种罕见但危及生命的疾病,需要快速诊断以便进行适当的治疗。实验室检测仅应在具有中高危预测试验概率的患者中进行。血小板因子 4(PF4)酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)是筛选试验,应通过更高特异性的测试(如肝素诱导的血小板聚集(HIPA)或 5-羟色胺释放试验(SRA)进行确认。本研究旨在评估 HIPA 与 SRA 的性能,确定 PF4 ELISA 的截断值以预测 HIPA/SRA 的阳性率,并研究疑似 HIT 患者的死亡率,这些患者被确诊为 HIT 阳性与阴性。

方法

所有进行阳性 PF4 ELISA 检测并进行确认性 HIPA 和 SRA 检测的患者均被纳入研究。由于 SRA 被认为是金标准,因此在 2022 年实施新的标准化解读指南前后,评估了 HIPA 与 SRA 的性能。还通过病历回顾记录了这些患者的死亡率。

结果

共有 232 例抗 PF4 IgG ELISA 阳性或不确定的患者进行了 HIPA 和 SRA 的确认性检测。HIPA 的灵敏度从 2018 年至 2021 年的 55.4%提高到 2022 年的 73.8%。特异性在 2018 年至 2021 年与 2022 年相似(94.9%与 87.5%)。2022 年阴性预测值(NPV)提高。预测 SRA 阳性的 PF4 光密度截断值为 0.85,预测 HIPA 阳性的截断值为 1.47,但当同时结合 HIPA 和/或 SRA 时,截断值降低至 0.83。疑似 HIT 患者被确诊为阳性与阴性的死亡率之间无显著差异。

结论

尽管 HIPA 的灵敏度低于 SRA,但新的标准化解读指南在 2022 年提高了其灵敏度和 NPV。未来需要进一步改进,以便将 HIPA 用作单独的确认性检测,以缩短住院时间并加快适当的抗凝治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验