Escobar Carlos, Bover Freire Ramón, García-Moll Marimón Xavier, González-Juanatey Carlos, Morillas Miren, Valle Muñoz Alfonso, Gómez Doblas Juan José
Cardiology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Cardiology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2023 Oct 31;13(5):777-791. doi: 10.21037/cdt-23-76. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, guideline documents on the management of anticoagulation were rapidly published. However, these documents did not follow a structured methodology, and significant differences existed between the guidelines. The aim of this expert consensus was to provide recommendations on the clinical management of oral anticoagulation in patients in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
A two-round Delphi study was conducted using an online survey. In the first round, panellists expressed their level of agreement with the items on a 9-point Likert scale. Items were selected if they received approval from ≥66.6% of panellists and if they were agreed by the scientific committee. In the second round, panellists revaluated those items that did not meet consensus in the first round.
A total of 147 panellists completed the first round, and 144 of them completed the second round. Consensus was reached on 161 items included in five dimensions. These dimensions addressed: (I) management of anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) without mechanical valves or moderate/severe mitral stenosis during COVID-19 infection; (II) thromboprophylaxis in patients hospitalised for COVID-19; (III) management of anticoagulation at hospital discharge/after COVID-19; (IV) anticoagulation monitoring in the COVID-19 pandemic setting; and (V) role of telemedicine in the management and follow-up of patients with AF in the COVID-19 pandemic setting.
These areas of collective agreement could specially guide clinicians in making decisions regarding anticoagulation in patients with COVID-19 during hospitalisation and at discharge, where results from clinical trials are still limited and, in some cases, conflicting.
在新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)大流行期间,关于抗凝管理的指南文件迅速发布。然而,这些文件并未遵循结构化方法,且指南之间存在显著差异。本专家共识的目的是针对COVID-19大流行背景下患者口服抗凝治疗的临床管理提供建议。
采用在线调查进行两轮德尔菲研究。在第一轮中,小组成员以9分李克特量表表示他们对各项内容的同意程度。如果某项内容得到≥66.6%的小组成员认可且得到科学委员会同意,则将其选中。在第二轮中,小组成员对第一轮未达成共识的项目重新进行评估。
共有147名小组成员完成了第一轮,其中144名完成了第二轮。就五个维度中的161项内容达成了共识。这些维度涉及:(I)COVID-19感染期间无机械瓣膜或无中度/重度二尖瓣狭窄的心房颤动(AF)患者的抗凝管理;(II)因COVID-19住院患者的血栓预防;(III)出院时/COVID-19后抗凝管理;(IV)COVID-19大流行背景下的抗凝监测;以及(V)远程医疗在COVID-19大流行背景下AF患者管理和随访中的作用。
这些达成集体共识的领域可特别指导临床医生在住院期间和出院时对COVID-19患者进行抗凝决策,因为临床试验结果仍然有限,且在某些情况下相互矛盾。