Soft Tissue Cam Impingement in Adolescents: MRI Reveals Impingement Lesions Underappreciated on Radiographs.

BACKGROUND

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has been described as repetitive and abnormal contact between a structurally abnormal proximal femur (cam) and/or acetabulum (pincer), occurring during the terminal range of motion of the hip. While cam and pincer lesions have traditionally been defined as osseous abnormalities, there may be a subset of adolescent patients whose impingement is primarily soft tissue (nonosseous). The existence of a nonosseous cam lesion in adolescents with FAI has not been well described.

PURPOSE

To identify and characterize a series of adolescent patients with nonosseous (soft cam) FAI identified on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compare these patients' clinical presentation and outcome with those of a cohort with primary osseous cam FAI in the same age group.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A prospective institutional registry of patients with symptomatic FAI was reviewed. Patients were included if they had an MRI scan and a lateral radiograph of the hip (45° Dunn or frog) at a baseline visit. On MRI, the anterolateral femoral head was evaluated using radial, coronal, sagittal, or axial oblique sequences. A soft cam lesion was identified by the presence of soft tissue thickening of ≥2 mm at the anterolateral femoral head-neck junction. An alpha angle was measured on MRI scans and radiographs when a lesion was identified. The cohort with soft cam lesions was reviewed and findings and outcomes were compared with those of a cohort with osseous cam lesions. Continuous variables were first examined for normality, and then nonparametric tests-such as the Kruskal-Wallis test-were considered. The change between pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) was described by mean and standard deviation and evaluated with an independent-samples test.

RESULTS

A total of 31 (9.3%) of 332 hips (mean age, 16.4 years [range 13.1-19.6 years]; women, 83.9%) were identified with a soft tissue impingment lesion on MRI at the femoral head-neck junction between the 12 and 3 o'clock positions. These lesions demonstrated a thickened perichondral ring (71%), periosteal thickening (26%), or a cartilaginous epiphyseal extension (3%). The mean alpha angle on MRI was greater than on radiographs (63.5°± 7.9° vs 51.3°± 7.9°; < .0001). A total of 22 patients (71%) with soft impingement underwent hip preservation surgery. When compared with patients in the osseous cohort who also underwent surgical management, both groups showed similar significant improvements from pre- to postoperatively (soft: modified Harris Hip Score [mHHS], 26.9 ± 18.2; Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [HOOS], 31.4 ± 22.9; osseous: mHHS, 22.8 ± 20.8; HOOS, 27.4 ± 20.1; < .0001), with a mean follow-up of 3.4 years (range, 1-7 years) in the soft cam cohort and 3 years (1-10.1 years) in the osseous cam cohort.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians should be aware of nonosseous or soft cam lesions that cause impingement in adolescent patients without an obvious osseous cam on radiographs. MRI is required to detect these soft cam lesions. When nonoperative treatment fails, the PROs in these patients after operative management are comparable with those in patients with osseous cam lesions. Further research is needed to determine whether the soft cam precedes an osseous cam or whether it is a separate entity.