Department of Gastroenterology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK.
Department of Clinical Research, Hirosaki General Medical Centre, National Hospital Organisation, Hirosaki, Japan.
J Crohns Colitis. 2024 May 31;18(5):695-707. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad190.
This post hoc analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis stratified by corticosteroid use from the ulcerative colitis Phase 3 clinical trial programme.
Patients were randomised [1:2] to 8 weeks' placebo or upadacitinib 45 mg once daily; Week 8 responders were re-randomised [1:1:1] to 52 weeks' placebo or upadacitinib 15 or 30 mg daily. Corticosteroid dose was kept stable during induction but tapered according to a protocol-defined schedule [or investigator discretion] during maintenance Weeks 0-8. Efficacy outcomes and exposure-adjusted, treatment-emergent adverse event [TEAE] rates were assessed for induction and maintenance stratified by corticosteroid use at induction baseline.
Overall, 377/988 [38%] patients were receiving corticosteroids at induction baseline [placebo, n = 133; upadacitinib 45 mg, n = 244] and 252 [37%] of the 681 clinical responders who entered maintenance were on corticosteroids at induction baseline [n = 84 for each treatment]. Similar proportions of patients receiving upadacitinib achieved clinical remission per Adapted Mayo Score with and without baseline corticosteroids at Weeks 8 and 52. The total proportion of patients re-initiating corticosteroids was higher with placebo [24/84;29%] vs upadacitinib 15 mg [16/81; 20%)] and 30 mg [11/81; 14%]. During induction, patients receiving corticosteroids at baseline had higher rates of TEAEs, serious TEAEs, and serious infections vs those not receiving corticosteroids; however, TEAE rates were similar during maintenance after corticosteroid withdrawal.
Upadacitinib is an effective steroid-sparing treatment in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Clinicaltrials.gov identifiers: NCT02819635; NCT03653026.
本事后分析评估了中重度溃疡性结肠炎患者使用依那西普的疗效和安全性,这些患者来自溃疡性结肠炎 3 期临床试验项目,并根据皮质类固醇的使用情况进行了分层。
患者被随机分为[1:2]安慰剂或依那西普 45mg 每日一次,第 8 周的应答者被重新随机分为[1:1:1]安慰剂或依那西普 15 或 30mg 每日一次。诱导期内皮质类固醇剂量保持稳定,但根据方案规定的方案[或研究者判断]在第 0-8 周的维持期内逐渐减少。根据诱导基线时皮质类固醇的使用情况,对诱导和维持期的疗效终点和暴露调整后的治疗出现的不良事件(TEAE)发生率进行了评估。
总体而言,988 例患者中有 377 例(38%)在诱导基线时接受皮质类固醇治疗[安慰剂组,n=133;依那西普 45mg 组,n=244],252 例(37%)进入维持期的临床应答者在诱导基线时接受皮质类固醇治疗[n=84 例,每组各 84 例]。无论诱导基线时是否使用皮质类固醇,使用依那西普的患者在第 8 周和第 52 周时达到改良 Mayo 评分的临床缓解的比例相似。与安慰剂组[24/84;29%]相比,使用依那西普 15mg 组[16/81;20%]和 30mg 组[11/81;14%]的患者重新开始使用皮质类固醇的比例更高。在诱导期,基线时接受皮质类固醇治疗的患者的 TEAE、严重 TEAE 和严重感染发生率高于未接受皮质类固醇治疗的患者;然而,在皮质类固醇停药后的维持期,TEAE 发生率相似。
在中重度溃疡性结肠炎患者中,依那西普是一种有效的类固醇节约治疗药物。临床试验编号:NCT02819635;NCT03653026。