Université de Lausanne, École des sciences criminelles, Bâtiment Batochime, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; Laboratoire de sciences judiciaires et de médecine légale, Department of Toxicology, 1701 Parthenais Street, Montréal, Québec H2K 3S7, Canada.
Laboratoire de sciences judiciaires et de médecine légale, Department of Toxicology, 1701 Parthenais Street, Montréal, Québec H2K 3S7, Canada.
Forensic Sci Int. 2023 Dec;353:111873. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111873. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
The assessment of human postmortem concentrations of Δ-THC (THC) and its metabolites, 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC (THCCOOH) and 11-hydroxy-THC (11-OH-THC), is routinely performed in forensic toxicology laboratories. However, the literature on cannabinoids postmortem redistribution (PMR) is scarce and highlights their complex postmortem changes. This study aims to investigate the postmortem behavior of THC and its metabolites in order to provide practitioners with potential indicators of PMR. To do so, antemortem and postmortem cases positive for cannabinoids were compiled in a database. Its analysis shows significantly higher THC concentrations in postmortem blood than in antemortem blood. Antemortem and postmortem blood also present significantly different profiles for their THC to THCCOOH ratios. Whereas antemortem blood generally shows THCCOOH concentrations higher or equal to THC, several postmortem cases show the opposite, with THC concentrations higher than THCCOOH. While occurrence of postmortem redistribution (PMR) is difficult to measure directly, an evaluation was performed using the central to peripheral (C/P) blood concentrations ratio as a proxy. With a C/P significantly lower than 1.0 for THC and significantly higher than 1.0 for THCCOOH, the PMR hypothesis is supported for both compounds, with redistribution towards peripheral blood for THC and towards central blood for THCCOOH. On the other hand, 11-OH-THC does not show a C/P significantly different than 1.0, suggesting the absence of PMR. Influence of body mass index, conservation state and postmortem interval on C/P was statistically analyzed and no significant impact was observed. To compare and contrast C/P observed in the database with those published in the literature, a meta-analysis was performed using a median of median (MM) model. THC PMR towards peripheral blood is supported by a global estimate of 0.81 (CI: 0.51 to 1.2). Redistribution towards femoral blood appears to be stronger than towards iliac blood; indeed, the median estimate of C/P decreases to 0.64 (CI: 0.40 to 1.1) when studies with iliac blood were removed from the meta-analysis. THCCOOH PMR towards central blood is supported by a C/P median estimate of 1.3 (CI: 0.97 to 1.6). THC PMR can be suspected when these indicators are observed (i) high THC blood concentration (>50 ng/mL), (ii) THC C/P lower than 1.0 (iii) blood THC/THCCOOH concentration ratios greater than 1.0 and (iv) non-detectability of THCCOOH in urine. In postmortem samples, many factors may contribute to the overestimation of THC concentration, therefore a careful interpretation is required, relying on both central and peripheral blood samples.
在法医毒理学实验室中,通常对人体死后 Δ-THC(THC)及其代谢物 11-去甲-9-羧酸-THC(THCCOOH)和 11-羟基-THC(11-OH-THC)的浓度进行评估。然而,关于大麻素死后再分布(PMR)的文献很少,这突出了它们在死后的复杂变化。本研究旨在调查 THC 及其代谢物的死后行为,以便为从业者提供 PMR 的潜在指标。为此,在数据库中编译了大麻素呈阳性的生前和死后病例。其分析表明,死后血液中的 THC 浓度明显高于生前血液。生前和死后血液的 THC 与 THCCOOH 比值也呈现出明显不同的特征。虽然生前血液中一般 THCCOOH 浓度高于或等于 THC,但有几个死后病例的情况相反,THC 浓度高于 THCCOOH。虽然死后再分布(PMR)的发生难以直接测量,但可以使用中央到外周(C/P)血液浓度比作为替代指标进行评估。当 THC 和 THCCOOH 的 C/P 分别显著低于 1.0 和显著高于 1.0 时,这两种化合物都支持 PMR 假说,THC 向外周血液重新分布,而 THCCOOH 向中央血液重新分布。另一方面,11-OH-THC 的 C/P 与 1.0 无显著差异,表明不存在 PMR。对 BMI、保存状态和死后间隔对 C/P 的影响进行了统计学分析,未观察到显著影响。为了将数据库中观察到的 C/P 与文献中发表的 C/P 进行比较和对比,使用中位数的中位数(MM)模型进行了荟萃分析。THC 向外周血液的 PMR 得到了全球估计值 0.81(CI:0.51 至 1.2)的支持。向股动脉血液的再分布似乎比向髂动脉血液更强;事实上,当从荟萃分析中去除髂动脉研究时,C/P 的中位数估计值降至 0.64(CI:0.40 至 1.1)。THCCOOH 向中央血液的 PMR 得到了 C/P 中位数估计值 1.3(CI:0.97 至 1.6)的支持。当观察到这些指标时,可能会怀疑存在 THC PMR:(i)血液 THC 浓度较高(>50ng/mL),(ii)C/P 低于 1.0,(iii)血液 THC/THCCOOH 浓度比值大于 1.0,(iv)尿液中未检出 THCCOOH。在死后样本中,许多因素可能导致 THC 浓度的高估,因此需要仔细解释,同时依赖于中央和外周血样。