Suppr超能文献

因 COVID-19 大流行导致高床位占用率和低床位占用率情况下的重症监护后 6 个月结局:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。

Six-month post-intensive care outcomes during high and low bed occupancy due to the COVID-19 pandemic: A multicenter prospective cohort study.

机构信息

Carrera de Kinesiología, Facultad de Medicina, Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile.

Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0294631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294631. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The COVID-19 pandemic can be seen as a natural experiment to test how bed occupancy affects post-intensive care unit (ICU) patient's functional outcomes. To compare by bed occupancy the frequency of mental, physical, and cognitive impairments in patients admitted to ICU during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

Prospective cohort of adults mechanically ventilated >48 hours in 19 ICUs from seven Chilean public and private hospitals. Ninety percent of nationwide beds occupied was the cut-off for low versus high bed occupancy. At ICU discharge, 3- and 6-month follow-up, we assessed disability using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Quality of life, mental, physical, and cognitive outcomes were also evaluated following the core outcome set for acute respiratory failure.

RESULTS

We enrolled 252 participants, 103 (41%) during low and 149 (59%) during high bed occupancy. Patients treated during high occupancy were younger (P50 [P25-P75]: 55 [44-63] vs 61 [51-71]; p<0.001), more likely to be admitted due to COVID-19 (126 [85%] vs 65 [63%]; p<0.001), and have higher education qualification (94 [63%] vs 48 [47%]; p = 0.03). No differences were found in the frequency of at least one mental, physical or cognitive impairment by bed occupancy at ICU discharge (low vs high: 93% vs 91%; p = 0.6), 3-month (74% vs 63%; p = 0.2) and 6-month (57% vs 57%; p = 0.9) follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in post-ICU outcomes between high and low bed occupancy. Most patients (>90%) had at least one mental, physical or cognitive impairment at ICU discharge, which remained high at 6-month follow-up (57%).

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04979897 (clinicaltrials.gov).

摘要

介绍

COVID-19 大流行可以被视为一项自然实验,以测试病床占用率如何影响重症监护病房(ICU)后患者的功能结果。本研究旨在比较 COVID-19 大流行期间 ICU 入住患者的心理、身体和认知障碍发生率与病床占用率的关系。

方法

这是一项来自智利 7 家公立和私立医院的 19 个 ICU 的成年人机械通气>48 小时的前瞻性队列研究。90%的全国床位占用率是低病床占用率与高病床占用率的分界点。在 ICU 出院时和 3 个月、6 个月随访时,我们使用世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0 评估残疾情况。还按照急性呼吸衰竭的核心结局集评估了生活质量、心理、身体和认知结局。

结果

共纳入 252 名患者,103 名(41%)患者入住低病床占用率 ICU,149 名(59%)患者入住高病床占用率 ICU。高病床占用率组患者年龄更小(P50[P25-P75]:55[44-63] vs 61[51-71];p<0.001),更有可能因 COVID-19 而入院(126[85%] vs 65[63%];p<0.001),且受教育程度更高(94[63%] vs 48[47%];p = 0.03)。在 ICU 出院时(低病床占用率 vs 高病床占用率:93% vs 91%;p = 0.6)、3 个月(74% vs 63%;p = 0.2)和 6 个月(57% vs 57%;p = 0.9)随访时,两组的心理、身体或认知障碍发生率无差异。

结论

高病床占用率与低病床占用率的 ICU 后结局无差异。大多数患者(>90%)在 ICU 出院时至少存在一种心理、身体或认知障碍,在 6 个月随访时仍保持较高水平(57%)。

临床试验注册

NCT04979897(clinicaltrials.gov)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/370a/10653414/eb94edc327d2/pone.0294631.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验