Matthews Timothy, Rasmussen Line Jee Hartmann, Ambler Antony, Danese Andrea, Eugen-Olsen Jesper, Fancourt Daisy, Fisher Helen L, Iversen Kasper Karmark, Schultz Martin, Sugden Karen, Williams Benjamin, Caspi Avshalom, Moffitt Terrie E
School of Human Sciences, Faculty of Education, Health and Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Brain Behav Immun. 2024 Jan;115:727-736. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2023.11.022. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
Social isolation and loneliness have been associated with poor health and increased risk for mortality, and inflammation might explain this link. We used data from the Danish TRIAGE Study of acutely admitted medical patients (N = 6,144, mean age 60 years), and from two population-representative birth cohorts: the New Zealand Dunedin Longitudinal Study (N = 881, age 45) and the UK Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study (N = 1448, age 18), to investigate associations of social isolation with three markers of systemic inflammation: C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and a newer inflammation marker, soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), which is thought to index systemic chronic inflammation. In the TRIAGE Study, socially isolated patients (those living alone) had significantly higher median levels of suPAR (but not CRP or IL-6) compared with patients not living by themselves. Social isolation prospectively measured in childhood was longitudinally associated with higher CRP, IL-6, and suPAR levels in adulthood (at age 45 in the Dunedin Study and age 18 in the E-Risk Study), but only suPAR remained associated after controlling for covariates. Dunedin Study participants who reported loneliness at age 38 or age 45 had elevated suPAR at age 45. In contrast, E-Risk Study participants reporting loneliness at age 18 did not show any elevated markers of inflammation. In conclusion, social isolation was robustly associated with increased inflammation in adulthood, both in medical patients and in the general population. It was associated in particular with systemic chronic inflammation, evident from the consistently stronger associations with suPAR than other inflammation biomarkers.
社会隔离和孤独感与健康状况不佳及死亡风险增加有关,炎症可能是造成这种关联的原因。我们使用了丹麦急性入院内科患者分诊研究(N = 6144,平均年龄60岁)以及两个具有人群代表性的出生队列的数据:新西兰达尼丁纵向研究(N = 881,年龄45岁)和英国环境风险(E-Risk)纵向双胞胎研究(N = 1448,年龄18岁),以调查社会隔离与三种全身炎症标志物之间的关联:C反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)以及一种较新的炎症标志物可溶性尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物受体(suPAR),该标志物被认为可指示全身慢性炎症。在分诊研究中,与非独居患者相比,社会隔离患者(独居者)的suPAR中位数水平显著更高(但CRP和IL-6并非如此)。童年时期前瞻性测量的社会隔离与成年期(达尼丁研究中为45岁,E-Risk研究中为18岁)较高的CRP、IL-6和suPAR水平存在纵向关联,但在控制协变量后,只有suPAR仍具有相关性。在达尼丁研究中,报告在38岁或45岁时感到孤独的参与者在45岁时suPAR水平升高。相比之下,在E-Risk研究中报告18岁时感到孤独的参与者并未显示出任何炎症标志物升高。总之,无论是在内科患者还是普通人群中,社会隔离都与成年期炎症增加密切相关。特别是它与全身慢性炎症有关,这从与suPAR的关联始终比其他炎症生物标志物更强中可见一斑。