Suppr超能文献

心脏手术成年患者中凝血酶原复合物浓缩物与新鲜冰冻血浆的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Prothrombin Complex Concentrate versus Fresh Frozen Plasma in Adult Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Viana Patricia, Relvas Jessica Hoffmann, Persson Marina, Cabral Thamiris Dias Delfino, Persson Jorge Eduardo, de Oliveira Jessica Sales, Bonow Paulo, Freire Camila Veronica Souza, Amaral Sara

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Universidade do Extremo Sul Catarinense, Criciuma, Brazil.

Department of Internal Medicine, Conjunto Hospitalar do Mandaqui, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Chest Surg. 2024 Jan 5;57(1):25-35. doi: 10.5090/jcs.23.081. Epub 2023 Nov 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) are commonly used to manage bleeding in patients during cardiac surgery. However, the relative efficacy and safety of these 2 strategies remain uncertain.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for studies comparing PCC and FFP in patients who underwent cardiac surgery complicated by bleeding. Review Manager (RevMan) ver. 5.4 (Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration) was used for statistical analysis. Binary and continuous outcomes were compared using pooled risk ratios and mean differences, respectively. The meta-analysis protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews under protocol number CRD42022379144.

RESULTS

We included 8 studies with 1,500 patients, of whom 613 (40.9%) received PCC. The mean follow-up period ranged from 28 to 90 days. The PCC group had significantly lower chest tube drainage at 24 hours (mean difference [MD], -148.50 mL; 95% CI, -253.02 to -43.99 mL; p=0.005; I=42%). Fewer units of red blood cells (RBCs) were transfused within the first 24 hours (MD, -1.02 units; 95% CI, -1.81 to -0.24 units; p=0.01; I=56%), and fewer patients required RBC transfusion within the first 24 hours (risk ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93; p<0.007; I=45%) in the PCC group. There were no statistically significant differences in secondary outcomes. Nonetheless, a subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials failed to corroborate the results obtained from the main analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that PCC can be effective, without increased adverse events, when compared with FFP in patients undergoing cardiac surgery complicated by bleeding.

摘要

背景

凝血酶原复合物浓缩剂(PCC)和新鲜冰冻血浆(FFP)常用于心脏手术患者出血的处理。然而,这两种策略的相对疗效和安全性仍不确定。

方法

检索MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane数据库,查找比较PCC和FFP在心脏手术并发出血患者中的研究。使用Review Manager(RevMan)5.4版(北欧Cochrane中心,Cochrane协作网)进行统计分析。分别使用合并风险比和平均差比较二分类和连续性结局。该荟萃分析方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库注册,注册号为CRD42022379144。

结果

我们纳入了8项研究,共1500例患者,其中613例(40.9%)接受了PCC治疗。平均随访期为28至90天。PCC组在24小时时胸腔引流量显著更低(平均差[MD],-148.50 mL;95%可信区间,-253.02至-43.99 mL;p = 0.005;I² = 42%)。PCC组在最初24小时内输注的红细胞(RBC)单位数更少(MD,-1.02单位;95%可信区间,-1.81至-0.24单位;p = 0.01;I² = 56%),且在最初24小时内需要输注RBC的患者更少(风险比,0.85;95%可信区间,0.78 - 0.93;p < 0.007;I² = 45%)。次要结局无统计学显著差异。尽管如此,随机对照试验的亚组分析未能证实主要分析所得结果。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,在心脏手术并发出血的患者中,与FFP相比,PCC可能有效且不会增加不良事件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e47/10792384/fc266e14188e/jcs-57-1-25-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验