• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于可解释机器学习的表型映射策略,用于随机临床试验中的适应性预测富集。

An explainable machine learning-based phenomapping strategy for adaptive predictive enrichment in randomized clinical trials.

作者信息

Oikonomou Evangelos K, Thangaraj Phyllis M, Bhatt Deepak L, Ross Joseph S, Young Lawrence H, Krumholz Harlan M, Suchard Marc A, Khera Rohan

机构信息

Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Mount Sinai Heart, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Nov 25;6(1):217. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00963-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41746-023-00963-z
PMID:38001154
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10673945/
Abstract

Randomized clinical trials (RCT) represent the cornerstone of evidence-based medicine but are resource-intensive. We propose and evaluate a machine learning (ML) strategy of adaptive predictive enrichment through computational trial phenomaps to optimize RCT enrollment. In simulated group sequential analyses of two large cardiovascular outcomes RCTs of (1) a therapeutic drug (pioglitazone versus placebo; Insulin Resistance Intervention after Stroke (IRIS) trial), and (2) a disease management strategy (intensive versus standard systolic blood pressure reduction in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)), we constructed dynamic phenotypic representations to infer response profiles during interim analyses and examined their association with study outcomes. Across three interim timepoints, our strategy learned dynamic phenotypic signatures predictive of individualized cardiovascular benefit. By conditioning a prospective candidate's probability of enrollment on their predicted benefit, we estimate that our approach would have enabled a reduction in the final trial size across ten simulations (IRIS: -14.8% ± 3.1%, p = 0.001; SPRINT: -17.6% ± 3.6%, p < 0.001), while preserving the original average treatment effect (IRIS: hazard ratio of 0.73 ± 0.01 for pioglitazone vs placebo, vs 0.76 in the original trial; SPRINT: hazard ratio of 0.72 ± 0.01 for intensive vs standard systolic blood pressure, vs 0.75 in the original trial; all simulations with Cox regression-derived p value of  < 0.01 for the effect of the intervention on the respective primary outcome). This adaptive framework has the potential to maximize RCT enrollment efficiency.

摘要

随机临床试验(RCT)是循证医学的基石,但资源消耗大。我们提出并评估一种通过计算试验表型图进行适应性预测富集的机器学习(ML)策略,以优化RCT入组。在两项大型心血管结局RCT的模拟序贯分析中,(1)一种治疗药物(吡格列酮与安慰剂;中风后胰岛素抵抗干预(IRIS)试验),以及(2)一种疾病管理策略(强化与标准收缩压降低在收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)中),我们构建了动态表型表征,以推断中期分析期间的反应概况,并检查它们与研究结局的关联。在三个中期时间点,我们的策略学习到了预测个体心血管获益的动态表型特征。通过以前瞻性候选者的预测获益为条件来确定其入组概率,我们估计我们的方法在十次模拟中能够减少最终试验规模(IRIS:-14.8%±3.1%,p = 0.001;SPRINT:-17.6%±3.6%,p < 0.001),同时保持原始平均治疗效果(IRIS:吡格列酮与安慰剂的风险比为0.73±0.01,而原始试验中为0.76;SPRINT:强化与标准收缩压的风险比为0.72±0.01,而原始试验中为0.75;所有模拟中干预对各自主要结局的影响经Cox回归得出的p值<0.01)。这种适应性框架有可能使RCT入组效率最大化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e60/10673945/96845bb01990/41746_2023_963_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e60/10673945/24a2b30ed432/41746_2023_963_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e60/10673945/2105a1116298/41746_2023_963_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e60/10673945/dd0fc2bed108/41746_2023_963_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e60/10673945/4799f7d2cbc0/41746_2023_963_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e60/10673945/96845bb01990/41746_2023_963_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e60/10673945/24a2b30ed432/41746_2023_963_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e60/10673945/2105a1116298/41746_2023_963_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e60/10673945/dd0fc2bed108/41746_2023_963_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e60/10673945/4799f7d2cbc0/41746_2023_963_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e60/10673945/96845bb01990/41746_2023_963_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
An explainable machine learning-based phenomapping strategy for adaptive predictive enrichment in randomized clinical trials.一种基于可解释机器学习的表型映射策略,用于随机临床试验中的适应性预测富集。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Nov 25;6(1):217. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00963-z.
2
An explainable machine learning-based phenomapping strategy for adaptive predictive enrichment in randomized controlled trials.一种基于可解释机器学习的表型映射策略,用于随机对照试验中的适应性预测富集。
medRxiv. 2023 Nov 1:2023.06.18.23291542. doi: 10.1101/2023.06.18.23291542.
3
Individualising intensive systolic blood pressure reduction in hypertension using computational trial phenomaps and machine learning: a post-hoc analysis of randomised clinical trials.使用计算试验表型图谱和机器学习对高血压患者进行个体化强化收缩压降低治疗:随机临床试验的事后分析。
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Nov;4(11):e796-e805. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00170-4.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Assessment of Risk of Harm Associated With Intensive Blood Pressure Management Among Patients With Hypertension Who Smoke: A Secondary Analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.高血压患者强化血压管理相关伤害风险评估:收缩压干预试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190005. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0005.
6
Benefit and harm of intensive blood pressure treatment: Derivation and validation of risk models using data from the SPRINT and ACCORD trials.强化血压治疗的益处与危害:利用收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)和控制糖尿病患者心血管风险行动(ACCORD)试验数据推导和验证风险模型
PLoS Med. 2017 Oct 17;14(10):e1002410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002410. eCollection 2017 Oct.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
9
A Novel Digital Twin Strategy to Examine the Implications of Randomized Clinical Trials for Real-World Populations.一种用于研究随机临床试验对真实世界人群影响的新型数字孪生策略。
medRxiv. 2024 Sep 6:2024.03.25.24304868. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.25.24304868.
10
More Versus Less Intensive Blood Pressure-Lowering Strategy: Cumulative Evidence and Trial Sequential Analysis.强化与非强化降压策略:累积证据与序贯试验分析
Hypertension. 2016 Sep;68(3):642-53. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.07608. Epub 2016 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence across the cancer care continuum.贯穿癌症护理全过程的人工智能
Cancer. 2025 Aug 15;131(16):e70050. doi: 10.1002/cncr.70050.
2
A scoping review of artificial intelligence applications in clinical trial risk assessment.人工智能在临床试验风险评估中的应用范围综述。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jul 30;8(1):486. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01886-7.
3
Computational Phenomapping of Randomized Clinical Trial Participants to Enable Assessment of Their Real-World Representativeness and Personalized Inference.随机临床试验参与者的计算表型映射,以评估其真实世界代表性和个性化推断

本文引用的文献

1
Why estimands are needed to define treatment effects in clinical trials.为何在临床试验中需要效应指标来定义治疗效果。
BMC Med. 2023 Jul 27;21(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02969-6.
2
Individualising intensive systolic blood pressure reduction in hypertension using computational trial phenomaps and machine learning: a post-hoc analysis of randomised clinical trials.使用计算试验表型图谱和机器学习对高血压患者进行个体化强化收缩压降低治疗:随机临床试验的事后分析。
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Nov;4(11):e796-e805. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00170-4.
3
Clinical trial design in the era of precision medicine.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2025 May;18(5):e011306. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011306. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
4
Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Clinical Trials in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Automating and Enhancing Disease Assessment and Study Management.炎症性肠病中基于人工智能的临床试验:实现疾病评估与研究管理的自动化并加以强化。
Gastroenterology. 2025 Aug;169(3):432-443. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2025.02.039. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
5
Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Clinical Trials.人工智能在心血管临床试验中的应用。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Nov 12;84(20):2051-2062. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.08.069.
6
Cardiovascular care with digital twin technology in the era of generative artificial intelligence.生成式人工智能时代基于数字孪生技术的心血管护理
Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 26;45(45):4808-21. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae619.
7
Measures to Improve Trial Enrollment: It's Game Time!提高试验入组率的措施:是时候行动了!
JACC Heart Fail. 2024 Nov;12(11):1942-1945. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.08.006. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
8
Clinical trial design, end-points, and emerging therapies in pulmonary arterial hypertension.肺动脉高压的临床试验设计、终点和新兴疗法。
Eur Respir J. 2024 Oct 31;64(4). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01205-2024. Print 2024 Oct.
9
The Introduction of AI Into Decentralized Clinical Trials: Preparing for a Paradigm Shift.人工智能引入去中心化临床试验:为范式转变做准备。
JACC Adv. 2024 Jul 5;3(8):101094. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101094. eCollection 2024 Aug.
10
Artificial intelligence-enhanced patient evaluation: bridging art and science.人工智能增强的患者评估:连接艺术与科学。
Eur Heart J. 2024 Sep 14;45(35):3204-3218. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae415.
精准医学时代的临床试验设计。
Genome Med. 2022 Aug 31;14(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13073-022-01102-1.
4
Prediction of Cognitive Decline for Enrichment of Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials.预测认知能力下降,以丰富阿尔茨海默病临床试验。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2022;9(3):400-409. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2022.49.
5
Improving clinical trial efficiency using a machine learning-based risk score to enrich study populations.利用基于机器学习的风险评分提高临床试验效率,以丰富研究人群。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 Aug;24(8):1418-1426. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2528. Epub 2022 May 22.
6
Application of predictive models in boosting power of Alzheimer's disease clinical trials: A post hoc analysis of phase 3 solanezumab trials.预测模型在增强阿尔茨海默病临床试验效能中的应用:3期solanezumab试验的事后分析
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2022 Mar 14;8(1):e12223. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12223. eCollection 2022.
7
A hybrid machine learning/deep learning COVID-19 severity predictive model from CT images and clinical data.基于 CT 图像和临床数据的机器学习/深度学习 COVID-19 严重程度预测模型的混合模型。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 14;12(1):4329. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07890-1.
8
Application of machine learning methods in clinical trials for precision medicine.机器学习方法在精准医学临床试验中的应用。
JAMIA Open. 2022 Feb 8;5(1):ooab107. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooab107. eCollection 2022 Apr.
9
Phenomapping-Derived Tool to Individualize the Effect of Canagliflozin on Cardiovascular Risk in Type 2 Diabetes.基于表型映射的工具,用于个体化评估卡格列净对 2 型糖尿病患者心血管风险的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Apr 1;45(4):965-974. doi: 10.2337/dc21-1765.
10
Overcoming barriers in the design and implementation of clinical trials for acute kidney injury: a report from the 2020 Kidney Disease Clinical Trialists meeting.克服急性肾损伤临床试验设计和实施中的障碍:2020 年肾脏病临床试验学家会议报告。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2023 Mar 31;38(4):834-844. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfac003.