Sampogna Gaia, Di Vincenzo Matteo, Giuliani Luigi, Menculini Giulia, Mancuso Emiliana, Arsenio Eleonora, Cipolla Salvatore, Della Rocca Bianca, Martiadis Vassilis, Signorelli Maria Salvina, Fiorillo Andrea
Department of Psychiatry, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Perugia, 06132 Perugia, Italy.
Brain Sci. 2023 Nov 10;13(11):1577. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13111577.
Pharmacological antipsychotic drug interventions represent the cornerstone of the management of patients with schizophrenia and other psychotic spectrum disorders. The choice of the "best" treatment should be made on the basis of several clinical domains. However, despite available treatments, the quality of life reported by patients with schizophrenia taking antipsychotics is still very poor, and this outcome is rarely taken into account in trials assessing the efficacy and effectiveness of antipsychotic treatments. Therefore, we performed a systematic review in order to assess the impact of antipsychotic treatment on patients' quality of life. In particular, we aimed to identify any differences in the improvement in quality of life according to the (a) type of formulation of antipsychotic drugs (i.e., oral vs. depot vs. long-acting injectable); (b) type of the drug (first vs. second vs. third generation); and (c) patients' clinical characteristics. One hundred and eleven papers were included in the review. The main findings were as follows: (1) quality of life is usually considered a secondary outcome in trials on the efficacy and effectiveness of drugs; (2) second-generation antipsychotics have a more positive effect on quality of life; and (3) long-acting injectable antipsychotics are associated with a more stable improvement in quality of life and with a good safety and tolerability profile. Our systematic review confirms that quality of life represents a central element for selecting the appropriate treatment for people with schizophrenia. In particular, the availability of new treatments with a better tolerability profile, a proven effectiveness on patients' cognitive and social functioning, and with a more stable blood concentration might represent the appropriate strategy for improving the quality of life of people with schizophrenia.
抗精神病药物干预是精神分裂症和其他精神病性谱系障碍患者管理的基石。“最佳”治疗方案的选择应基于多个临床领域。然而,尽管有可用的治疗方法,但服用抗精神病药物的精神分裂症患者报告的生活质量仍然很差,而且在评估抗精神病治疗疗效和有效性的试验中很少考虑这一结果。因此,我们进行了一项系统评价,以评估抗精神病治疗对患者生活质量的影响。具体而言,我们旨在确定根据以下因素在生活质量改善方面的任何差异:(a)抗精神病药物的剂型(即口服、长效注射剂);(b)药物类型(第一代、第二代、第三代);以及(c)患者的临床特征。该评价纳入了111篇论文。主要结果如下:(1)在药物疗效和有效性试验中,生活质量通常被视为次要结果;(2)第二代抗精神病药物对生活质量有更积极的影响;(3)长效注射用抗精神病药物与生活质量更稳定的改善以及良好的安全性和耐受性相关。我们的系统评价证实,生活质量是为精神分裂症患者选择合适治疗方法的核心要素。特别是,具有更好耐受性、对患者认知和社会功能有已证实的有效性且血药浓度更稳定的新治疗方法的可用性,可能是改善精神分裂症患者生活质量的合适策略。