Suppr超能文献

对美国食品药品监督管理局基于组学的药效学生物标志物以确立生物相似性的批判性分析。

A Critical Analysis of the FDA's Omics-Driven Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers to Establish Biosimilarity.

作者信息

Niazi Sarfaraz K

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

出版信息

Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Nov 2;16(11):1556. doi: 10.3390/ph16111556.

Abstract

Demonstrating biosimilarity entails comprehensive analytical assessment, clinical pharmacology profiling, and efficacy testing in patients for at least one medical indication, as required by the U.S. Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA). The efficacy testing can be waived if the drug has known pharmacodynamic (PD) markers, leaving most therapeutic proteins out of this concession. To overcome this, the FDA suggests that biosimilar developers discover PD biomarkers using omics technologies such as proteomics, glycomics, transcriptomics, genomics, epigenomics, and metabolomics. This approach is redundant since the mode-action-action biomarkers of approved therapeutic proteins are already available, as compiled in this paper for the first time. Other potential biomarkers are receptor binding and pharmacokinetic profiling, which can be made more relevant to ensure biosimilarity without requiring biosimilar developers to conduct extensive research, for which they are rarely qualified.

摘要

根据美国《生物制品价格竞争与创新法案》(BPCIA)的要求,证明生物相似性需要进行全面的分析评估、临床药理学分析以及针对至少一种医学适应症在患者中进行疗效测试。如果药物具有已知的药效学(PD)标志物,则可以豁免疗效测试,这使得大多数治疗性蛋白质无法享受此项优惠。为克服这一问题,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)建议生物相似药开发商使用蛋白质组学、糖组学、转录组学、基因组学、表观基因组学和代谢组学等组学技术发现PD生物标志物。由于本文首次汇编了已批准治疗性蛋白质的作用机制生物标志物,因此这种方法是多余的。其他潜在的生物标志物是受体结合和药代动力学分析,可以使其更具相关性,以确保生物相似性,而无需生物相似药开发商进行广泛的研究,因为他们很少具备这样的资质。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c553/10675618/74167913d193/pharmaceuticals-16-01556-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验