Plum Island Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Foreign Animal Disease Research Unit, Orient, NY 11957, USA.
National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Manhattan, KS 66502, USA.
Viruses. 2023 Nov 11;15(11):2246. doi: 10.3390/v15112246.
The African swine fever virus (ASFV) is currently causing a world-wide pandemic of a highly lethal disease in domestic swine and wild boar. Currently, recombinant ASF live-attenuated vaccines based on a genotype II virus strain are commercially available in Vietnam. With 25 reported ASFV genotypes in the literature, it is important to understand the molecular basis and usefulness of ASFV genotyping, as well as the true significance of genotypes in the epidemiology, transmission, evolution, control, and prevention of ASFV. Historically, genotyping of ASFV was used for the epidemiological tracking of the disease and was based on the analysis of small fragments that represent less than 1% of the viral genome. The predominant method for genotyping ASFV relies on the sequencing of a fragment within the gene encoding the structural p72 protein. Genotype assignment has been accomplished through automated phylogenetic trees or by comparing the target sequence to the most closely related genotyped p72 gene. To evaluate its appropriateness for the classification of genotypes by p72, we reanalyzed all available genomic data for ASFV. We conclude that the majority of p72-based genotypes, when initially created, were neither identified under any specific methodological criteria nor correctly compared with the already existing ASFV genotypes. Based on our analysis of the p72 protein sequences, we propose that the current twenty-five genotypes, created exclusively based on the p72 sequence, should be reduced to only six genotypes. To help differentiate between the new and old genotype classification systems, we propose that Arabic numerals (1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 23) be used instead of the previously used Roman numerals. Furthermore, we discuss the usefulness of genotyping ASFV isolates based only on the p72 gene sequence.
非洲猪瘟病毒(ASFV)目前正在全球范围内导致家猪和野猪发生高度致命性疾病。目前,越南市售的重组 ASFV 减毒活疫苗基于基因型 II 病毒株。在文献中有 25 种报道的 ASFV 基因型,了解 ASFV 基因分型的分子基础和实用性,以及基因型在 ASFV 的流行病学、传播、进化、控制和预防中的真正意义非常重要。从历史上看,ASFV 的基因分型用于疾病的流行病学追踪,并且基于代表病毒基因组的小于 1%的小片段的分析。ASFV 的主要基因分型方法依赖于编码结构 p72 蛋白的基因内的片段测序。基因型分配是通过自动系统发育树或通过将目标序列与最密切相关的已基因分型的 p72 基因进行比较来完成的。为了评估其用于 p72 分类基因型的适当性,我们重新分析了所有可用的 ASFV 基因组数据。我们得出结论,大多数基于 p72 的基因型最初创建时,既没有根据任何特定的方法标准进行识别,也没有与现有的 ASFV 基因型正确比较。基于我们对 p72 蛋白序列的分析,我们建议当前仅基于 p72 序列创建的二十五个基因型应减少至仅六个基因型。为了帮助区分新的和旧的基因型分类系统,我们建议使用阿拉伯数字(1、2、8、9、15 和 23)代替以前使用的罗马数字。此外,我们还讨论了仅基于 p72 基因序列对 ASFV 分离株进行基因分型的有用性。