Professor Asja Prohić, MD, PhD, Department of Dermatovenerology, Sarajevo Medical School, University Sarajevo School of Science and Technology, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina;
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2023 Nov;31(2):106-109.
For over two decades, the acronym PAPA syndrome has been used to describe an autoinflammatory condition caused by missense mutations in the PSTPIP1 (proline-serine-threonine phosphatase interacting protein 1) gene and clinically characterized by the presence of pyogenic arthritis, pyoderma gangrenosum (PG), and acne (1,2). Due to the involvement of the PSTPIP1 gene in the regulation of innate immunity, mutations of this gene cause abnormal activation of inflammasomes, complexes of NLRP3/ASC/caspase-1 proteins. As a result, production of interleukin-1β, a key molecule that triggers synthesis of cytokines necessary for the recruitment of neutrophils, is significantly increased (2,3). Additionally, the levels of other pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interferon-γ (INF-γ) and interleukin 17 (IL-7) are also elevated, which further disrupts inflammatory mechanisms in the microenvironment (4). Since hyperproduction of IL-1 and other involved cytokines is the predominant event in the pathogenesis, these molecules are promising targets in the treatment of PAPA syndrome. Corticosteroids and biologics are currently the most commonly used agents for inducing and hastening remission of symptoms (5). A substantial step forward in the treatment of PAPA syndrome has been the introduction of medications blocking the cytokines crucial in the pathogenesis of this disorder, with TNF-α and IL-1 inhibitors being the most frequent choice of such biological therapy (6). We report the case of a 22-year-old male patient with PAPA syndrome who was referred to our department 18 months ago due to exacerbation of skin changes. Initial presentation and subsequent evolution of disease in this patient matched the typical clinical pattern of PAPA syndrome. The first symptoms occurred at the age of two in the form of unspecific joint disease that was diagnosed as juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Subsequently, in the early adolescence the patient presented with new skin changes manifesting as severe acne and persistent pyoderma gangrenosum-like ulcers. At the same time, severity of joint involvement gradually decreased. After the characteristic phenotype of the disease had fully developed, suspicion of possible syndromic origin of symptoms arose. For this reason, genetic analysis was performed as requested by attending pediatricians at the University Clinical Center in Sarajevo, and E250Q mutation of the PSTPIP1 gene was detected. Thus, the diagnosis of PAPA syndrome was confirmed. Throughout the duration of the disease, several types of medication had been introduced in the treatment with varying success. Earliest joint symptoms were alleviated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, while repeated courses of corticosteroids were the mainstay of the therapy during a decade-long period. As a consequence of prolonged steroid therapy, growth disorder, among various other side-effects, had been especially pronounced. Acting as a classic steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agent, methotrexate had also been part of the patient's treatment regimen. Lastly, biologics, including both TNF-α and IL-a inhibitors, had been separately administered as the remaining treatment options. However, adalimumab expressed a predominant effect on joint symptoms, whereas re-activation of previously undetected Hepatitis-B infection occurred during the subsequent therapy with anakinra. Due to this adverse reaction, anakinra treatment was discontinued. At the initial examination, the patient presented with multiple erythematous, partially excoriated papules and nodules, along with residual post-inflammatory hyperpigmented patches and scars on the skin of the whole back, chest, shoulders, and upper arms (Figure 1, Figure 2). The presence of postoperative scars on the elbows, resulting from previously performed surgical procedures of persistently affected joints with the goal of achieving pain relief and functional improvement, was also observed. Several smaller ulcers with undermined edges (Figure 3), as well as residual hyperpigmentation and cicatrices (Figure 4) were visible on the lower extremities. Additionally, the patient reported appearance of pustules and non-healing ulcers after minor trauma, which corresponds to the pathergy phenomenon, a common feature of PAPA syndrome. In contrast to the severity of cutaneous changes, the joint symptoms were mild. After thorough assessment of the patient's medical history and current condition, a multi-agent regimen was initiated, consisting of adalimumab, isotretinoin, and prednisone. Regular check-ups during the 12 months of treatment showed that the applied agents stabilized the patient's condition, alleviated more severe and acute skin changes, and slowed down further exacerbation of symptoms. Due to the rarity of PAPA syndrome, data on its treatment is scarce. Official guidelines are non-existing, and available information is based on case reports, case series, and a few smaller retrospective studies (5,7). In general, response to therapy remains inconsistent between patients, despite introduction of novel drugs. Furthermore, single treatment regimens are often not equally effective for all manifestations of the disease, which in a number of cases results in the administration of multi-agent treatment (2). As described in our case report, we opted for a multi-agent regimen not only due to specific individual role of each drug in the treatment of PAPA syndrome but also because of the possible augmented effect of combined therapy. Initially, a short course of systemic corticosteroid (prednisone 30 mg/day for 3 weeks) was introduced in order to alleviate acute symptoms until other agents started showing their effects. The initial dose of administered corticosteroid was gradually tapered by 5 mg every week and soon discontinued. Adalimumab (40 mg every 2 weeks for 12 months) was chosen since its previous administration was without significant adverse effects and with more acceptable end results, unlike therapy with anakinra (8). In addition, TNF-α inhibitors, such as adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab, have been generally regarded as a more effective treatment option for cutaneous changes, while anakinra, an anti-IL-1 agent, has been more beneficial in alleviating joint symptoms (9-11). Since the skin of our patient was significantly more affected than the joints, adalimumab was a preferred option for biological treatment. Finally, isotretinoin (0.5 mg/kg/day for 6 months) also found a place in our multi-agent therapy plan as a specific, supportive treatment agent for acne (12). Due to the fact that our national health insurance system covered the costs of treatment with TNF-α inhibitors for only 12 months, adalimumab had to be discontinued after the end of this period. Episodes of acute exacerbation that the patient experienced after the cessation of multi-agent regimen were addressed with systemic corticosteroids and symptomatic therapy. Based on case reports, corticosteroids are usually one of the first agents to be administered in patients diagnosed with PAPA syndrome. They are frequently effective in alleviating joint symptoms, but, on the other hand, high doses of corticosteroids can worsen acne lesions (6). Moreover, due to the multiple side-effects of corticosteroids, such as electrolyte abnormalities, hypertension, hyperglycemia, osteoporosis, growth suppression, and adrenal insufficiency (13), a steroid-sparing agent is typically introduced into treatment together with or after corticosteroid therapy. A substantial step forward in the treatment of PAPA syndrome has been achieved with the introduction of medications targeting cytokines crucial in the pathogenesis of this disorder. The two most commonly used groups of such biological drugs have been those that block TNF-α and IL-1. A longer lasting improvement of symptoms has been achieved in a number of cases with both types of agents. Since other medications have often failed to establish long-term control of PAPA syndrome, such effects can be seen as a valuable accomplishment (6,14). Regardless of this observation, the response to treatment still differs between patients. More variable effects have been documented for IL-1 inhibitors, such as anakinra, while TNF-α inhibitors, such as adalimumab, infliximab, and etanercept, have been associated with more steady responses (4,6,10). The inconsistent effect of biologic therapies could be explained by the fact that PSTPIP1 protein is involved in various biochemical processes in different cells of the immune system. Thuse, none of the medications has an adequate spectrum of activity to control all involved immunological pathways (5,15). Overall, due to scarcity of valid information and guidelines, there is an increasing need for multicentric randomized controlled trials that would provide evidence-based data on effective treatment options for PAPA syndrome. Despite the rarity of this disorder, extensive research should be performed in order to discover therapies that could successfully manage all different manifestations of PAPA syndrome. Consequently, such efforts and breakthroughs would lead to decreased mortality and improved quality of life for patients suffering from this debilitating disease. The case described herein shows that PAPA syndrome can remain undiagnosed for longer periods of time, resulting in delayed treatment. Furthermore, the available therapeutic options are not sufficient to achieve long-term remission in many patients. Thus, continuous and comprehensive research is vital for ensuring adequate care of patients with PAPA syndrome.
二十多年来,PAPA 综合征这一缩写一直被用于描述由 PSTPIP1(丝氨酸-苏氨酸-脯氨酸磷酸酶相互作用蛋白 1)基因错义突变引起的自身炎症性疾病,其临床特征为化脓性关节炎、坏疽性脓皮病(PG)和痤疮(1,2)。由于 PSTPIP1 基因参与先天免疫的调节,该基因的突变会导致炎症小体的异常激活,炎症小体是 NLRP3/ASC/caspase-1 蛋白复合物。结果,白细胞介素-1β(一种触发募集中性粒细胞所需细胞因子合成的关键分子)的产生显著增加(2,3)。此外,其他促炎细胞因子,如肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、干扰素-γ(INF-γ)和白细胞介素 17(IL-17)的水平也升高,这进一步破坏了微环境中的炎症机制(4)。由于 IL-1 和其他涉及的细胞因子的过度产生是发病机制中的主要事件,因此这些分子是治疗 PAPA 综合征的有希望的靶点。皮质类固醇和生物制剂是目前诱导和加速缓解症状的最常用药物(5)。PAPA 综合征治疗的一个重大进展是引入了阻断该疾病发病机制中关键细胞因子的药物,TNF-α 和 IL-1 抑制剂是此类生物治疗最常见的选择(6)。我们报告了一例 22 岁男性 PAPA 综合征患者,他 18 个月前因皮肤变化加重而被转诊至我们科室。该患者的初始表现和随后的疾病演变与 PAPA 综合征的典型临床模式相吻合。最初的症状发生在两岁时,表现为非特异性关节病,被诊断为幼年特发性关节炎。随后,在青少年早期,他出现了新的皮肤变化,表现为严重的痤疮和持续的坏疽性脓皮病样溃疡。与此同时,关节受累的严重程度逐渐减轻。在疾病的典型表型完全发展后,出现了可能与综合征起源的症状有关的怀疑。出于这个原因,应萨拉热窝大学临床中心儿科医生的要求进行了基因分析,并检测到 PSTPIP1 基因的 E250Q 突变。因此,确诊为 PAPA 综合征。在整个疾病过程中,已经引入了几种不同类型的药物进行治疗,取得了不同程度的成功。最早的关节症状通过非甾体抗炎药得到缓解,而在长达十年的时间里,皮质类固醇的反复疗程是治疗的主要手段。由于长期接受皮质类固醇治疗,除了其他各种副作用外,生长障碍也尤为明显。甲氨蝶呤作为一种经典的类固醇类免疫抑制剂,也被纳入了患者的治疗方案。最后,生物制剂,包括 TNF-α 和 IL-a 抑制剂,作为剩余的治疗选择分别单独给药。然而,阿达木单抗对关节症状表现出主要的疗效,而在随后用阿那白滞素进行治疗时,先前未检测到的乙型肝炎感染再次激活。由于出现这种不良反应,停止了阿那白滞素的治疗。在最初的检查中,患者表现为多个红斑、部分剥脱的丘疹和结节,以及背部、胸部、肩部和上臂整个皮肤的残留炎症后色素沉着斑和疤痕(图 1、图 2)。由于持续受影响的关节疼痛缓解和功能改善的目的而进行了多次手术,因此在肘部也观察到了手术后的疤痕。较小的溃疡伴边缘下凹(图 3),以及残留的色素沉着和疤痕(图 4)也可见于下肢。此外,患者报告在轻微外伤后出现脓疱和未愈合的溃疡,这与 PAPA 综合征的特征性表现之一的痛性结节现象相吻合。与皮肤变化的严重程度相比,关节症状较轻。在对患者的病史和目前状况进行全面评估后,开始采用多药物治疗方案,包括阿达木单抗、异维 A 酸和泼尼松。在 12 个月的治疗期间定期进行检查,结果表明所应用的药物稳定了患者的病情,缓解了更严重和急性的皮肤变化,并减缓了症状的进一步恶化。由于 PAPA 综合征的罕见性,关于其治疗的数据很少。没有正式的指南,可用的信息基于病例报告、病例系列和一些较小的回顾性研究(5,7)。一般来说,尽管引入了新的药物,但治疗反应在患者之间仍然不一致。单一治疗方案对疾病的所有表现并不总是同样有效,在许多情况下,需要联合治疗(2)。正如我们的病例报告所描述的,我们选择多药物治疗方案不仅是因为每种药物在 PAPA 综合征治疗中的特定个体作用,还因为联合治疗可能产生增强效应。最初,引入了短疗程的全身性皮质类固醇(泼尼松 30mg/天,持续 3 周)以缓解急性症状,直到其他药物开始发挥作用。最初剂量的皮质类固醇逐渐每周减少 5mg,并很快停药。选择阿达木单抗(40mg,每 2 周一次,持续 12 个月)是因为其先前的治疗没有明显的不良反应,并且结果更可接受,而不像用阿那白滞素治疗(8)。此外,TNF-α 抑制剂,如阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗,通常被认为是治疗皮肤变化的更有效治疗选择,而抗 IL-1 药物,如阿那白滞素,在缓解关节症状方面更有益(9-11)。由于我们患者的皮肤比关节受到更严重的影响,阿达木单抗是生物治疗的首选药物。最后,异维 A 酸(0.5mg/kg/天,持续 6 个月)也被纳入我们的多药物治疗计划,作为治疗痤疮的特定支持性治疗药物(12)。由于我们的国家健康保险系统仅涵盖 TNF-α 抑制剂治疗 12 个月的费用,因此在治疗结束后不得不停止阿达木单抗的治疗。在多药物治疗方案停止后,患者经历了急性发作的发作,通过全身皮质类固醇和对症治疗来处理。根据病例报告,皮质类固醇通常是诊断为 PAPA 综合征的患者首先使用的药物之一。它们通常能有效缓解关节症状,但另一方面,大剂量皮质类固醇会加重痤疮病变(6)。此外,由于皮质类固醇的多种副作用,如电解质异常、高血压、高血糖、骨质疏松症、生长抑制和肾上腺功能不全(13),通常在皮质类固醇治疗后或同时引入类固醇类免疫抑制剂。随着针对在该疾病发病机制中起关键作用的细胞因子的药物的引入,PAPA 综合征的治疗取得了重大进展。两种最常用的生物药物是阻断 TNF-α 和 IL-1 的药物。在许多情况下,通过使用这两种类型的药物都能更持久地改善症状。尽管如此,由于其他药物通常未能控制 PAPA 综合征,因此这种效果可以被视为一个有价值的成就(6,14)。尽管有这种观察结果,但治疗反应仍在患者之间存在差异。在某些情况下,IL-1 抑制剂(如阿那白滞素)的作用更为持久,而 TNF-α 抑制剂(如阿达木单抗、英夫利昔单抗和依那西普)的作用则更为稳定(4,6,10)。生物疗法效果不一致的原因可能是 PSTPIP1 蛋白参与了不同免疫细胞的不同生化过程。因此,没有一种药物具有足够的活性来控制所有涉及的免疫途径(5,15)。总的来说,由于缺乏有效的信息和指南,因此需要进行更多的多中心随机对照试验,为 PAPA 综合征提供有效的治疗选择的证据。尽管这种疾病罕见,但仍需要进行广泛的研究,以发现能够成功治疗 PAPA 综合征所有不同表现的疗法。因此,这些努力和突破将降低患者的死亡率,提高他们的生活质量。所描述的病例表明,PAPA 综合征可能会在较长时间内未被诊断,从而导致治疗延迟。此外,目前的治疗选择不足以使许多患者长期缓解。因此,持续全面的研究对于确保 PAPA 综合征患者得到充分的护理至关重要。