Fairclough Stuart J, Clifford Lauren, Brown Denver, Tyler Richard
Movement Behaviours, Health, Wellbeing, and Nutrition Research Group, Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, St Helens Road, Ormskirk, Lancashire, L39 4QP UK.
Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249 USA.
J Act Sedentary Sleep Behav. 2023;2(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s44167-023-00021-9. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
Time-use estimates are typically used to describe 24-hour movement behaviours. However, these behaviours can additionally be characterised by other easily measured metrics. These include sleep quality (e.g., sleep efficiency), 24-hour rest-activity rhythmicity (e.g., between-day rhythm variability), and directly measured acceleration metrics (e.g., intensity gradient). Associations between these characteristics and youth mental health are unclear. This study aimed to [1] compare 24-hour movement behaviour characteristics by sex and age groups, [2] determine which movement behaviour characteristics were most strongly associated with mental health outcomes, and [3] investigate the optimal time-use behaviour compositions for different mental health outcomes.
Three-hundred-and-one children and adolescents (age 9-13 y; 60% girls) wore accelerometers for 24-hours/day over 7-days. Overall mental health, externalising, and internalising problems were self-reported using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. 24-hour movement behaviour characteristics were categorised as time-use estimates, sleep quality, 24-hour activity rhythmicity, and directly measured acceleration. Linear mixed models and compositional data analysis were used to analyse the data in alignment with the study aims.
Time-use estimates, directly measured accelerations, and 24-hour rest-activity rhythm metrics indicated that children were significantly more physically active (p = .01-<0.001) than adolescents. Children were also less sedentary (p < .01), slept longer (p = .02-0.01), and had lower sleep efficiency. Boys were significantly more active than girls (p < .001) who in turn accrued more time in sleep (p = .02). The timing of peak activity was significantly later among adolescents (p = .047). Overall mental health and externalising problems were significantly associated with sleep, sedentary time, sleep efficiency, amplitude, and inter-daily stability (p = .04-0.01). The optimal time-use compositions were specific to overall mental health and externalising problems and were characterised by more sleep, light and vigorous physical activity, and less sedentary time and moderate physical activity than the sample's mean time-use composition.
Extracting and examining multiple movement behaviour characteristics from 24-hour accelerometer data can provide a more rounded picture of the interplay between different elements of movement behaviours and their relationships with mental health than single characteristics alone, such as time-use estimates. Applying multiple movement behaviour characteristics to the translation of research findings may enhance the impact of the data for research users.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44167-023-00021-9.
时间使用估计通常用于描述24小时的运动行为。然而,这些行为还可以通过其他易于测量的指标来表征。这些指标包括睡眠质量(例如,睡眠效率)、24小时休息-活动节律性(例如,日间节律变异性)以及直接测量的加速度指标(例如,强度梯度)。这些特征与青少年心理健康之间的关联尚不清楚。本研究旨在[1]按性别和年龄组比较24小时运动行为特征,[2]确定哪些运动行为特征与心理健康结果最密切相关,以及[3]研究不同心理健康结果的最佳时间使用行为构成。
301名儿童和青少年(9至13岁;60%为女孩)连续7天每天佩戴加速度计24小时。使用优势和困难问卷自我报告总体心理健康、外化和内化问题。24小时运动行为特征分为时间使用估计、睡眠质量、24小时活动节律性和直接测量的加速度。使用线性混合模型和成分数据分析来根据研究目的分析数据。
时间使用估计、直接测量的加速度和24小时休息-活动节律指标表明,儿童的身体活动显著多于青少年(p = 0.01至<0.001)。儿童久坐时间也更少(p < 0.01),睡眠时间更长(p = 0.02至0.01),且睡眠效率较低。男孩的活动明显多于女孩(p < 0.001),而女孩的睡眠时间则更长(p = 0.02)。青少年的活动高峰时间明显更晚(p = 0.047)。总体心理健康和外化问题与睡眠、久坐时间、睡眠效率、振幅和日间稳定性显著相关(p = 0.04至0.01)。最佳时间使用构成特定于总体心理健康和外化问题,其特征是与样本的平均时间使用构成相比,睡眠、轻度和剧烈身体活动更多,久坐时间和中度身体活动更少。
从24小时加速度计数据中提取和检查多个运动行为特征,比单独的单个特征(如时间使用估计)能更全面地描绘运动行为不同要素之间的相互作用及其与心理健康的关系。将多个运动行为特征应用于研究结果的转化可能会增强数据对研究用户的影响。
在线版本包含可在10.1186/s44167 - 023 - 00021 - 9获取的补充材料。