Wang Jiaqiang, Zhang Fan, Dong Shuping, Yang Yang, Gao Fangfang, Liu Guancong, Zhang Peng, Wang Xin, Du Xinhui, Tian Zhichao
Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Modern Educational Technology Center, Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Front Oncol. 2023 Nov 13;13:1227461. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1227461. eCollection 2023.
Effective adjuvant therapy for osteosarcoma is necessary for improved outcomes. Previous studies demonstrated that apatinib plus doxorubicin-based chemotherapy may improve the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy. This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness and safety of apatinib plus doxorubicin and cisplatin (AP) as neoadjuvant therapy for osteosarcoma.
The clinical data of osteosarcoma patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and surgery between August 2016 and April 2022 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: the apatinib plus AP (apatinib + AP) group and the methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MAP) group.
This study included 42 patients with nonmetastatic osteosarcoma (19 and 23 patients in the apatinib + AP and MAP groups, respectively). The 1- and 2-year disease-free survival rates in the apatinib + AP group were higher than those in the MAP group, but the difference was not significant (P=0.165 and 0.283, respectively). Some adverse events were significantly more common in the apatinib + AP group than in the MAP group, including oral mucositis (grades 3 and 4) (52.6% vs. 17.4%, respectively, P=0.023), limb edema (47.4% vs. 17.4%, respectively, P=0.049), hand-foot syndrome (31.6% vs. 0%, respectively, P=0.005), proteinuria (26.3% vs. 0%, respectively, P=0.014), hypertension (21.1% vs. 0%, respectively, P=0.035), and hypothyroidism (21.1% vs. 0%, respectively, P=0.035). No drug-related deaths occurred. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the groups (P>0.05).
The present study suggests that apatinib + AP may be a promising candidate for neoadjuvant therapy for osteosarcoma, warranting further validation in prospective randomized controlled clinical trials with long-term follow-up.
有效的骨肉瘤辅助治疗对于改善预后是必要的。既往研究表明,阿帕替尼联合基于多柔比星的化疗可能提高新辅助治疗的疗效。本研究旨在阐明阿帕替尼联合多柔比星和顺铂(AP)作为骨肉瘤新辅助治疗的有效性和安全性。
回顾性收集并分析2016年8月至2022年4月期间接受新辅助治疗和手术的骨肉瘤患者的临床资料。患者分为两组:阿帕替尼联合AP(阿帕替尼+AP)组和甲氨蝶呤、多柔比星和顺铂(MAP)组。
本研究纳入42例非转移性骨肉瘤患者(阿帕替尼+AP组和MAP组分别为19例和23例)。阿帕替尼+AP组的1年和2年无病生存率高于MAP组,但差异无统计学意义(分别为P=0.165和0.283)。阿帕替尼+AP组的一些不良事件明显比MAP组更常见,包括口腔黏膜炎(3级和4级)(分别为52.6%对17.4%,P=0.023)、肢体水肿(分别为47.4%对17.4%,P=0.049)、手足综合征(分别为31.6%对0%,P=0.005)、蛋白尿(分别为26.3%对0%,P=0.014)、高血压(分别为21.1%对0%,P=0.035)和甲状腺功能减退(分别为21.1%对0%,P=0.035)。未发生与药物相关的死亡。两组术后并发症发生率无统计学差异(P>0.05)。
本研究表明,阿帕替尼+AP可能是骨肉瘤新辅助治疗的一个有前景的选择,值得在长期随访的前瞻性随机对照临床试验中进一步验证。