Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Cochrane Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders Group, Institute of General Practice, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 30;11(11):CD015395. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015395.pub3.
Oral nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) aims to avoid severe COVID-19 in asymptomatic people or those with mild symptoms, thereby decreasing hospitalization and death. It remains to be evaluated for which indications and patient populations the drug is suitable.
To assess the efficacy and safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir plus standard of care (SoC) compared to SoC with or without placebo, or any other intervention for treating COVID-19 or preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection. To explore equity aspects in subgroup analyses. To keep up to date with the evolving evidence base using a living systematic review (LSR) approach and make new relevant studies available to readers in-between publication of review updates.
We searched the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, Scopus, and World Health Organization COVID-19 Research Database, identifying completed and ongoing studies without language restrictions and incorporating studies up to 15 May 2023. This is a LSR. We conduct update searches every two months and make them publicly available on the open science framework (OSF) platform.
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing nirmatrelvir/ritonavir plus SoC to SoC with or without placebo, or any other intervention for treatment of people with confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis, irrespective of disease severity or treatment setting, and for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection. We screened all studies for research integrity. Studies were ineligible if they had been retracted, or if they were not prospectively registered including appropriate ethics approval.
We followed standard Cochrane methodology and used the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. We rated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach for the following outcomes: 1. to treat outpatients with mild COVID-19; 2. to treat inpatients with moderate to severe COVID-19: mortality, clinical worsening or improvement, quality of life, (serious) adverse events, and viral clearance; 3. to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in postexposure prophylaxis (PEP); and 4. pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) scenarios: SARS-CoV-2 infection, development of COVID-19 symptoms, mortality, admission to hospital, quality of life, and (serious) adverse events. We explored inequity by subgroup analysis for elderly people, socially-disadvantaged people with comorbidities, populations from low-income countries and low- to middle-income countries, and people from different ethnic and racial backgrounds.
As of 15 May 2023, we included two RCTs with 2510 participants with mild and mild to moderate symptomatic COVID-19 in outpatient and inpatient settings comparing nirmatrelvir/ritonavir plus SoC to SoC with or without placebo. All trial participants were without previous confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and at high risk for progression to severe disease. Randomization coincided with the Delta wave for outpatients and Omicron wave for inpatients. Outpatient trial participants and 73% of inpatients were unvaccinated. Symptom onset in outpatients was no more than five days before randomisation and prior or concomitant therapies including medications highly dependent on CYP3A4 were not allowed. We excluded two studies due to concerns with research integrity. We identified 13 ongoing studies. Three studies are currently awaiting classification. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir for treating people with asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 in outpatient settings Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir plus SoC compared to SoC plus placebo may reduce all-cause mortality at 28 days (risk ratio (RR) 0.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.00 to 0.68; 1 study, 2224 participants; low-certainty evidence) and admission to hospital or death within 28 days (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.27; 1 study, 2224 participants; low-certainty evidence). Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir plus SoC may reduce serious adverse events during the study period compared to SoC plus placebo (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.41; 1 study, 2224 participants; low-certainty evidence). Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir plus SoC probably has little or no effect on treatment-emergent adverse events (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.10; 1 study, 2224 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and probably increases treatment-related adverse events such as dysgeusia and diarrhoea during the study period compared to SoC plus placebo (RR 2.06, 95% CI 1.44 to 2.95; 1 study, 2224 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir plus SoC probably decreases discontinuation of study drug due to adverse events compared to SoC plus placebo (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.80; 1 study, 2224 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No studies reported improvement of clinical status, quality of life, or viral clearance. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir for treating people with moderate to severe COVID-19 in inpatient settings We are uncertain whether nirmatrelvir/ritonavir plus SoC compared to SoC reduces all-cause mortality at 28 days (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.86; 1 study, 264 participants; very low-certainty evidence), or increases viral clearance at seven days (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.58; 1 study, 264 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and 14 days (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.20; 1 study, 264 participants; very low-certainty evidence). No studies reported improvement or worsening of clinical status and quality of life. We did not include data for safety outcomes due to insufficient and inconsistent information. Subgroup analyses for equity For outpatients, the outcome 'admission to hospital or death' was investigated for equity regarding age (less than 65 years versus 65 years or greater) and ethnicity. There were no subgroup differences for age or ethnicity. For inpatients, the outcome 'all-cause mortality' was investigated for equity regarding age (65 years or less versus greater than 65 years). There was no difference between subgroups of age. No further equity-related subgroups were reported, and no subgroups were reported for other outcomes. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir for preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection (PrEP and PEP) No studies available.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Low-certainty evidence suggests nirmatrelvir/ritonavir reduces the risk of all-cause mortality and hospital admission or death in high-risk, unvaccinated COVID-19 outpatients infected with the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2. There is low- to moderate-certainty evidence of the safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir. Very low-certainty evidence exists regarding the effects of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir on all-cause mortality and viral clearance in mildly to moderately affected, mostly unvaccinated COVID-19 inpatients infected with the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2. Insufficient and inconsistent information prevents the assessment of safety outcomes. No reliable differences in effect size and direction were found regarding equity aspects. There is no available evidence supporting the use of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir for preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection. We are continually updating our search and making search results available on the OSF platform.
口服奈玛特韦/利托那韦(Paxlovid)旨在避免无症状感染者或轻症患者发生严重 COVID-19,从而减少住院和死亡。尚需评估该药适用于哪些指征和患者人群。
评估奈玛特韦/利托那韦联合标准治疗(SoC)与 SoC 加安慰剂或任何其他干预措施治疗 COVID-19 或预防 SARS-CoV-2 感染的疗效和安全性。探讨亚组分析中的公平性问题。使用实时系统评价(LSR)方法及时更新证据基础,并在更新综述发布之间为读者提供新的相关研究。
我们检索了 Cochrane COVID-19 研究注册库、Scopus 和世界卫生组织 COVID-19 研究数据库,纳入已完成和正在进行的研究,无语言限制,并纳入截至 2023 年 5 月 15 日的研究。这是一项 LSR。我们每两个月进行一次更新搜索,并将其在开放科学框架(OSF)平台上公开。
我们纳入了比较奈玛特韦/利托那韦联合 SoC 与 SoC 加安慰剂或任何其他干预措施治疗确诊 COVID-19 患者,无论疾病严重程度或治疗环境如何,以及预防 SARS-CoV-2 感染的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们对所有研究进行了研究完整性筛查。如果研究被撤回,或者如果研究没有前瞻性注册包括适当的伦理批准,则不符合纳入标准。
我们遵循了 Cochrane 标准方法,并使用了 Cochrane RoB 2 工具。我们使用 GRADE 方法评估了以下结局的证据确定性:1. 治疗门诊轻症 COVID-19;2. 治疗住院中重度 COVID-19:死亡率、临床改善或恶化、生活质量、(严重)不良事件和病毒清除;3. 在接触后预防(PEP)中预防 SARS-CoV-2 感染;以及 4. 在暴露前预防(PrEP)情况下:SARS-CoV-2 感染、出现 COVID-19 症状、死亡率、住院、生活质量和(严重)不良事件。我们通过亚组分析探索了公平性,包括老年人、有合并症的社会弱势群体、来自低收入国家和中低收入国家的人群,以及来自不同种族和民族背景的人群。
截至 2023 年 5 月 15 日,我们纳入了两项 RCT,共 2510 名门诊和住院有轻症和轻症至中度 COVID-19症状的患者,比较了奈玛特韦/利托那韦联合 SoC 与 SoC 加安慰剂。所有试验参与者均无先前确诊的 SARS-CoV-2 感染,且有进展为重症疾病的高风险。随机化与门诊患者的 Delta 波和住院患者的 Omicron 波同时发生。门诊试验参与者和 73%的住院患者未接种疫苗。门诊患者症状出现时间不超过随机化前五天,且禁止同时使用包括高度依赖 CYP3A4 的药物在内的预先或同时治疗。我们因研究完整性问题排除了两项研究。我们还确定了 13 项正在进行的研究。其中三项研究目前正在等待分类。奈玛特韦/利托那韦治疗门诊无症状或轻症 COVID-19患者奈玛特韦/利托那韦联合 SoC 与 SoC 加安慰剂相比,可能降低 28 天全因死亡率(风险比(RR)0.04,95%置信区间(CI)0.00 至 0.68;1 项研究,2224 名参与者;低确定性证据)和 28 天内住院或死亡(RR 0.13,95%CI 0.07 至 0.27;1 项研究,2224 名参与者;低确定性证据)。奈玛特韦/利托那韦联合 SoC 可能降低研究期间的严重不良事件(RR 0.24,95%CI 0.15 至 0.41;1 项研究,2224 名参与者;低确定性证据)。奈玛特韦/利托那韦联合 SoC 可能对治疗出现的不良事件影响较小或无影响(RR 0.95,95%CI 0.82 至 1.10;1 项研究,2224 名参与者;中等确定性证据),且可能在研究期间增加治疗相关不良事件,如味觉障碍和腹泻(RR 2.06,95%CI 1.44 至 2.95;1 项研究,2224 名参与者;中等确定性证据)。奈玛特韦/利托那韦联合 SoC 可能降低由于不良事件而导致停止研究药物的比例(RR 0.49,95%CI 0.30 至 0.80;1 项研究,2224 名参与者;中等确定性证据)。没有研究报告改善临床状态、生活质量或病毒清除。奈玛特韦/利托那韦治疗住院中重度 COVID-19患者我们不确定奈玛特韦/利托那韦联合 SoC 是否能降低 28 天全因死亡率(RR 0.63,95%CI 0.21 至 1.86;1 项研究,264 名参与者;非常低确定性证据)或增加 7 天(RR 1.06,95%CI 0.71 至 1.58;1 项研究,264 名参与者;非常低确定性证据)和 14 天(RR 1.05,95%CI 0.92 至 1.20;1 项研究,264 名参与者;非常低确定性证据)的病毒清除率。没有研究报告改善或恶化的临床状态和生活质量。由于信息不足且不一致,我们没有纳入安全性结局的数据。公平性亚组分析对于门诊患者,我们对“住院或死亡”这一结局进行了年龄(<65 岁与≥65 岁)和种族的公平性亚组分析。在年龄或种族亚组中没有发现组间差异。对于住院患者,我们对“全因死亡率”这一结局进行了年龄(<65 岁或≥65 岁)的公平性亚组分析。在年龄亚组中没有差异。没有报告其他亚组,也没有报告其他结局的亚组。奈玛特韦/利托那韦预防 SARS-CoV-2 感染(PrEP 和 PEP)无研究可用。
低确定性证据表明,奈玛特韦/利托那韦可降低高风险、未接种疫苗的 COVID-19 门诊患者的全因死亡率和住院或死亡风险,这些患者感染的是 Delta 变异株 SARS-CoV-2。奈玛特韦/利托那韦具有低至中确定性的安全性证据。关于奈玛特韦/利托那韦对轻度至中度 COVID-19 住院患者的全因死亡率和病毒清除的影响,存在非常低至中等确定性证据。非常低的确定性证据表明,奈玛特韦/利托那韦对预防 SARS-CoV-2 感染没有效果。由于信息不足且不一致,我们无法评估安全性结局。没有发现效果大小和方向的差异与公平性方面有关。没有可靠的证据支持使用奈玛特韦/利托那韦预防 SARS-CoV-2 感染。我们正在持续更新搜索,并在 OSF 平台上发布搜索结果。