Suppr超能文献

巴西不孕不育治疗的可及性:用于生物伦理讨论的问卷验证。

Access to infertility care in Brazil: validation of a questionnaire for a bioethical discussion.

机构信息

Faculdade de Medicina de Itajubá (FMIT), Av. Rennó Junior, 368, São Vicente, Itajubá, MG, CEP 37502-138, Brasil.

Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Reprod Health. 2023 Dec 8;20(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01724-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization characterizes infertility as a disease since 2009; however, in many countries, reproductive health is not prioritized. Characterizing a target population and knowing the barriers to accessing reproductive care may allow for a broadening of the discussion on how to provide equal opportunities. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a questionnaire that seeks to identify socioeconomic and cultural characteristics of Brazilian infertile couples to open the discussion on the principle of fair access to health.

METHODS

(1) literature review in the main databases, (2) questionnaire elaboration by researchers within the areas of human reproduction and bioethics, concerned with content adequacy and comprehension, using the Google Forms online platform, (3) pilot study - the questionnaire was applied to 54 couples, over 18 years of age, that were seeking treatment for infertility and accepted to participate in the study and (4) statistical analysis - for continuous numerical variables, mean, standard deviation and 95% CI of the means were presented. For discrete numerical variables, median, interquartile range, minimum and maximum were presented.

RESULTS

Forty-four questionnaires were fully completed and with adequate answers. The questionnaire proved to be objective and easy to understand. It was possible to obtain information on education, race of the couple, the impact of infertility on the couple's life, socioeconomic conditions, and the main difficulties in accessing medical care for treatment of infertility.

CONCLUSION

The questionnaire proved to be feasible in collecting appropriate information to characterize a target population and the only limitation was that there was no academic expert evaluation prior to the pilot test.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织自 2009 年起将不孕定义为一种疾病;然而,在许多国家,生殖健康并未得到优先重视。对目标人群进行特征描述并了解获得生殖保健的障碍因素,可能有助于扩大关于如何提供平等机会的讨论。本研究的目的是开发和验证一份问卷,旨在确定巴西不孕夫妇的社会经济和文化特征,以开启关于公平获得健康机会原则的讨论。

方法

(1)在主要数据库中进行文献回顾;(2)由生殖和生物伦理学领域的研究人员共同制定问卷,关注内容的充分性和理解程度,使用 Google Forms 在线平台;(3)预试验-对 54 对年龄在 18 岁以上,寻求不孕治疗且同意参与研究的夫妇进行问卷调查;(4)统计分析-对于连续数值变量,呈现均值、标准差和均值的 95%置信区间。对于离散数值变量,呈现中位数、四分位距、最小值和最大值。

结果

44 份问卷完整填写且答案充分。问卷被证明是客观和易于理解的。它能够获取关于教育、夫妇种族、不孕对夫妇生活的影响、社会经济状况以及在获得医疗服务治疗不孕方面的主要困难等信息。

结论

该问卷在收集适当信息以描述目标人群方面是可行的,唯一的限制是在预试验之前没有进行学术专家评估。

相似文献

1
Access to infertility care in Brazil: validation of a questionnaire for a bioethical discussion.
Reprod Health. 2023 Dec 8;20(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01724-7.
4
Assessment of sexual and emotional distress in infertile couple: validation of a new specific psychometric tool.
J Endocrinol Invest. 2020 Dec;43(12):1729-1737. doi: 10.1007/s40618-020-01263-z. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
6
Regional and geographical variations in infertility: effects of environmental, cultural, and socioeconomic factors.
Environ Health Perspect. 1993 Jul;101 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):73-80. doi: 10.1289/ehp.93101s273.
8
Top 10 priorities for future infertility research: an international consensus development study.
Fertil Steril. 2021 Jan;115(1):180-190. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.11.014. Epub 2020 Nov 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Autonomy in Tension: Reproduction, Technology, and Justice.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2017 Dec;47 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S2-S5. doi: 10.1002/hast.788.
2
The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017.
Hum Reprod. 2017 Sep 1;32(9):1786-1801. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex234.
4
Introduction: Access to fertility care.
Fertil Steril. 2016 May;105(5):1111-1112. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.034. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
5
Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century.
Hum Reprod Update. 2015 Jul-Aug;21(4):411-26. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmv016. Epub 2015 Mar 22.
8
Human rights to in vitro fertilization.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Oct;123(1):86-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
9
Right to assisted reproductive technology: overcoming infertility in low-resource countries.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Aug;106(2):172-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.03.034. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
10
[Elaboration and validation of the nursing interview].
Rev Bras Enferm. 2006 May-Jun;59(3):314-20. doi: 10.1590/s0034-71672006000300012.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验