Zabag Reut, Rinck Mike, Becker Eni, Gilboa-Schechtman Eva, Levy-Gigi Einat
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States; Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
J Psychiatr Res. 2024 Jan;169:279-283. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.11.041. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
Social anxiety (SA) is associated with difficulties in positively updating negative social information when new information and feedback about chosen options (actual decisions) are received. However, it is unclear whether this difficulty persists when hidden information regarding unchosen options is explicitly presented. The aim of the current study was to address this gap. Participants (Mturk; n = 191) completed a two-phases novel task. In the task, participants chose to approach or avoid people, represented by images of faces. During the initial (learning) phase, participants learned, in a probabilistic context, which people are associated with negative outcomes and should be avoided, and which are associated with positive outcomes and should be approached. During the subsequent updating phase, people previously associated with negative outcomes became associated with positive outcomes and vice versa. Importantly, participants received feedback not only on their approach (actual) decisions, but also on their avoidance (counter-factual) decisions (e.g., approaching this person would have been beneficial). The results revealed that even when the consequences of avoidance were explicitly presented, SA was associated with difficulty in positive updating of social information. The findings support the view that biased updating of social information is a change-resistant mechanism that may underlie the maintenance of SA.
社交焦虑(SA)与在接收到有关所选选项(实际决策)的新信息和反馈时积极更新负面社交信息方面的困难有关。然而,当明确呈现有关未选选项的隐藏信息时,这种困难是否仍然存在尚不清楚。本研究的目的是填补这一空白。参与者(MTurk;n = 191)完成了一项两阶段的新颖任务。在任务中,参与者选择接近或避开由面部图像代表的人。在初始(学习)阶段,参与者在概率背景下学习哪些人与负面结果相关且应避开,哪些人与正面结果相关且应接近。在随后的更新阶段,先前与负面结果相关的人变得与正面结果相关,反之亦然。重要的是,参与者不仅收到关于他们接近(实际)决策的反馈,还收到关于他们避开(反事实)决策的反馈(例如,接近这个人会是有益的)。结果显示,即使明确呈现了避开的后果,社交焦虑仍与社交信息的积极更新困难有关。这些发现支持了这样一种观点,即社交信息的偏差更新是一种可能构成社交焦虑维持基础的抗变化机制。