Canziani Laura, Orlando Francesca, Villa Michele, Cassina Tiziano
Department of Cardiac Annaesthesia and Intensive Care, Cardiocentro Ticino Institute, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland.
Eur J Case Rep Intern Med. 2023 Nov 2;10(12):004120. doi: 10.12890/2023_004120. eCollection 2023.
Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) may be a life-saving rescue therapy for patients with severe cardiac disease of any origin and circulatory failure. Data in the literature have demonstrated that the use of advanced mechanical circulation has resulted in improvements in both survival and quality of life; despite this, cardiogenic shock and refractory cardiac arrest remain conditions with high mortality. Opportune identification of patients who can benefit from it may improve outcomes. However, the shortage of guidelines on indications often results in a high mortality rate and poor outcome. Due to ethical issues, randomised controlled studies with VA-ECMO have not been conducted so no recommended evidence-based guidelines exist for VA-ECMO patient-selection criteria. Therefore, the indications depend only on expert opinion after reviewing the literature.
We report the case of a young female patient who presented with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) due to spontaneous coronary dissection. She was treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) with excellent results in terms of short and long-term survival, and neurological outcome. This was despite the presence of several clinical and laboratory negative prognostic factors on the basis of the current literature, and the lack of general consensus among the relevant medical personnel.
We were able to explain the favourable outcome only on the basis of clinical data. We can conclude that the availability of advanced resources in the area (timeliness of the rescues, quality of the resuscitation, an advanced haemodynamic management centre nearby) has contributed to determining the complete clinical and neurological recovery of the patient.
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation to rescue patients with cardiac arrest refractory to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation could represent a life-saving technique in carefully selected patients.Refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with evolution to a non-shockable rhythm and severe lactic acidosis are conditions that should not rule out ECPR.Evidence-based selection of ECPR patients remains challenging, but it could be considered as a therapeutic option in dedicated specialised centres.
静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合(VA-ECMO)可能是治疗任何病因所致严重心脏病和循环衰竭患者的一种挽救生命的急救疗法。文献数据表明,使用先进的机械循环可改善生存率和生活质量;尽管如此,心源性休克和难治性心脏骤停的死亡率仍然很高。及时识别可从该疗法中获益的患者可能会改善治疗结果。然而,适应症指南的缺乏常常导致高死亡率和不良预后。由于伦理问题,尚未进行VA-ECMO的随机对照研究,因此不存在基于证据的VA-ECMO患者选择标准推荐指南。因此,适应症仅取决于文献综述后的专家意见。
我们报告了一名年轻女性患者的病例,该患者因自发性冠状动脉夹层导致院外心脏骤停(OHCA)。她接受了体外心肺复苏(ECPR)治疗,在短期和长期生存以及神经学转归方面均取得了优异的效果。尽管根据当前文献存在若干临床和实验室不良预后因素,且相关医务人员之间缺乏普遍共识,但仍取得了良好效果。
我们只能根据临床数据来解释这一良好结果。我们可以得出结论,该地区先进资源的可利用性(救援的及时性、复苏质量、附近有先进的血流动力学管理中心)有助于确定患者的完全临床和神经学康复。
体外心肺复苏用于抢救对传统心肺复苏难治的心脏骤停患者可能是一种在精心挑选的患者中挽救生命的技术。难治性院外心脏骤停进展为不可电击心律和严重乳酸酸中毒不应排除ECPR。基于证据选择ECPR患者仍然具有挑战性,但在专门的专业中心可将其视为一种治疗选择。