Ruf Stefanie, Druba Jan-Michael, Hagemeister Carmen
Associate Professorship of Urban Design, School of Engineering and Design, Technische Universität München, Germany; Chair of Assessment and Intervention, Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany.
Chair of Assessment and Intervention, Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany.
J Safety Res. 2023 Dec;87:107-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.09.009. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
Cyclists riding next to parked vehicles are at risk of crashes with opening vehicle doors. A central position, out of this dooring zone, decreases such a risk but comes with other problems like potentially smaller passing distances kept by overtaking motorists or having to cross tram rails.
Factors influencing cyclists' choice of position were investigated by showing a total of 3,444 German cyclists different traffic situations in two online surveys. In the first study (N = 1,850), parked cars, the position of a cyclist riding ahead in the presented images (towards the curb/center of the lane), and presence and kind of sharrows were varied. As the variation in results for the different sharrow types was negligible, in Study 2 (N = 1,594), only the most common type was used. Whether cyclists prefer to accept the risk of falling while crossing tram rails or the risk of being too close to the curb or parked cars was investigated, varying the presence of tram rails, which has not been previously researched. In both studies, respondents indicated which position on the road they would choose in the depicted situations and answered questions about subjective safety, a factor closely related to cyclists' choice of position.
Cyclists chose positions farther towards the center of the road if there were parked cars and they chose an even more central position with tram rails. Respondents felt safer with sharrows on the road as well as in situations without parked cars and in situations without tram rails. Discussion and practical implications: The results indicate that, in addition to infrastructure characteristics, other cyclists' behavior (descriptive norm) influences cyclists' position on the road as well as their perceived safety. Implications for infrastructure design, especially regarding (the removal of) parked cars, are discussed.
在停放车辆旁骑行的自行车骑行者面临着被打开的车门碰撞的风险。处于远离这个“开门区域”的中心位置可降低此类风险,但也会带来其他问题,比如超车的驾车者保持的超车距离可能更小,或者不得不穿过有轨电车轨道。
通过在两项在线调查中向总共3444名德国自行车骑行者展示不同交通场景,研究了影响骑行者位置选择的因素。在第一项研究(N = 1850)中,改变了停放的汽车、所展示图像中前方骑行的自行车骑行者的位置(靠路边/车道中心)以及“共享车道标志”(sharrows)的有无和类型。由于不同类型“共享车道标志”的结果差异可忽略不计,在研究2(N = 1594)中,仅使用了最常见的类型。研究了骑行者是更愿意接受穿过有轨电车轨道时摔倒的风险,还是更愿意接受离路边或停放车辆太近的风险,改变了有轨电车轨道的有无,这一点此前尚未有过研究。在两项研究中,受访者指出在描绘的场景中他们会选择道路上的哪个位置,并回答了关于主观安全性的问题,主观安全性是与骑行者位置选择密切相关的一个因素。
如果有停放的汽车,骑行者会选择更靠近道路中心的位置;如果有有轨电车轨道,他们会选择更居中的位置。受访者在道路上有“共享车道标志”时、没有停放车辆的情况下以及没有有轨电车轨道的情况下感觉更安全。讨论与实际意义:结果表明,除了基础设施特征外,其他骑行者的行为(描述性规范)也会影响骑行者在道路上的位置以及他们的感知安全性。讨论了对基础设施设计的影响,特别是关于(移除)停放车辆方面的影响。