• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸主动脉瘤腔内修复与开放修复的成本。

Costs of endovascular and open repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms.

机构信息

Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 3;111(1). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad378.

DOI:10.1093/bjs/znad378
PMID:38091972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10763539/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms with either endovascular repair (TEVAR) or open surgical repair (OSR) represents major surgery, is costly and associated with significant complications. The aim of this study was to establish accurate costs of delivering TEVAR and OSR in a cohort of UK NHS patients suitable for open and endovascular treatment for the whole treatment pathway from admission and to discharge and 12-month follow-up.

METHODS

A prospective study of UK NHS patients from 30 NHS vascular/cardiothoracic units in England aged ≥18, with distal arch/descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (CTAA) was undertaken. A multicentre prospective cost analysis of patients (recruited March 2014-July 2018, follow-up until July 2019) undergoing TEVAR or OSR was performed. Patients deemed suitable for open or endovascular repair were included in this study. A micro-costing approach was adopted.

RESULTS

Some 115 patients having undergone TEVAR and 35 patients with OSR were identified. The mean (s.d.) cost of a TEVAR procedure was higher £26 536 (£9877) versus OSR £17 239 (£8043). Postoperative costs until discharge were lower for TEVAR £7484 (£7848) versus OSR £28 636 (£23 083). Therefore, total NHS costs from admission to discharge were lower for TEVAR £34 020 (£14 301), versus OSR £45 875 (£43 023). However, mean NHS costs for 12 months following the procedure were slightly higher for the TEVAR £5206 (£11 585) versus OSR £5039 (£11 994).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical procedure costs were higher for TEVAR due to device costs. Total in-hospital costs were higher for OSR due to longer hospital and critical care stay. Follow-up costs over 12 months were slightly higher for TEVAR due to hospital readmissions.

摘要

背景

胸主动脉瘤的治疗包括血管内修复(TEVAR)或开放手术修复(OSR),这两种治疗均为大手术,费用高昂,且伴有严重的并发症。本研究旨在确定一组适合开放和血管内治疗的英国国民保健服务(NHS)患者的 TEVAR 和 OSR 治疗总费用,包括从入院到出院及 12 个月随访的全过程。

方法

在英格兰 30 个 NHS 血管/心胸外科中心开展了一项针对年龄≥18 岁、有远端弓/降主动脉夹层动脉瘤(CTAA)的英国 NHS 患者的前瞻性研究。对 2014 年 3 月至 2018 年 7 月期间接受 TEVAR 或 OSR 治疗的患者(随访至 2019 年 7 月)进行了一项多中心前瞻性成本分析。本研究纳入了适合开放或血管内修复的患者。采用微观成本法。

结果

共确定了 115 例行 TEVAR 治疗的患者和 35 例行 OSR 治疗的患者。TEVAR 手术的平均(标准差)费用为£26536(£9877),高于 OSR 的£17239(£8043)。TEVAR 术后直到出院的费用较低,为£7484(£7848),而 OSR 为£28636(£23083)。因此,从入院到出院的 NHS 总费用,TEVAR 为£34020(£14301),低于 OSR 的£45875(£43023)。然而,TEVAR 术后 12 个月的 NHS 平均费用略高,为£5206(£11585),而 OSR 为£5039(£11994)。

结论

由于设备费用,TEVAR 的手术费用较高。由于住院和重症监护时间较长,OSR 的总住院费用较高。由于需要再次住院,TEVAR 的 12 个月随访费用略高。

相似文献

1
Costs of endovascular and open repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms.胸主动脉瘤腔内修复与开放修复的成本。
Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 3;111(1). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad378.
2
Open aneurysmorraphy following branched and fenestrated endovascular repair of complex thoracic aneurysms.复杂胸主动脉瘤分支及开窗腔内修复术后开放性动脉瘤修补术
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Feb;81(2):300-307. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.09.033. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
3
Comparative analysis of arch vessel revascularization techniques in proximal arch thoracic endovascular aortic repair.近端主动脉弓腔内修复术中弓血管重建技术的对比分析
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jul;82(1):43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.03.203. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
4
Effectiveness of surgical interventions for thoracic aortic aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.胸主动脉瘤手术干预的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Oct;66(4):1258-1268.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.05.082. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
5
Laparoscopic surgery for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.择期腹主动脉瘤修复的腹腔镜手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 4;5(5):CD012302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012302.pub2.
6
Systematic review and meta-analysis of association of prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid drainage in preventing spinal cord ischemia after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.胸主动脉腔内修复术后预防性脑脊液引流预防脊髓缺血相关性的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Apr;75(4):1478-1489.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.10.050. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
7
Endovascular Repair Versus Open Surgical Repair for Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.血管内修复与开放手术修复复杂腹主动脉瘤的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 Jul;93:355-368. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.06.102. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
8
Endovascular treatment for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.破裂性腹主动脉瘤的血管内治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 26;5(5):CD005261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005261.pub4.
9
Aneurysmal degeneration of type B aortic dissections after thoracic endovascular aortic repair: A systematic review.胸主动脉腔内修复术后B型主动脉夹层的动脉瘤样退变:一项系统评价。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Sep;66(3):924-930. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.06.067. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
10
A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing single-stage versus multistaged approaches for endovascular repair of extensive thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms.一项比较单阶段与多阶段方法用于广泛胸腹主动脉瘤血管内修复的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2025 Jul;82(1):275-285.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2025.01.234. Epub 2025 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends and disparities in age, sex, ethnoracial background, and urbanization status in adult mortality due to thoracic aortic aneurysm: a retrospective nationwide study in the United States.胸主动脉瘤导致成人死亡的年龄、性别、种族背景和城市化状况的趋势及差异:美国一项全国性回顾性研究
Int J Surg. 2024 Dec 1;110(12):7647-7655. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002150.

本文引用的文献

1
Endovascular stent grafting and open surgical replacement for chronic thoracic aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and prospective cohort study.血管内支架移植物和开放手术治疗慢性胸主动脉瘤:系统评价和前瞻性队列研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Jan;26(6):1-166. doi: 10.3310/ABUT7744.
2
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) Statement: Updated Reporting Guidance for Health Economic Evaluations.2022 年健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS 2022)声明:健康经济评估报告的更新指南。
J Med Econ. 2022 Jan;25(sup1):1-7. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2021.2014721.
3
Micro-costing in health and medicine: a critical appraisal.卫生与医学领域的微观成本核算:批判性评估
Health Econ Rev. 2021 Jan 6;11(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13561-020-00298-5.
4
The use of micro-costing in economic analyses of surgical interventions: a systematic review.微观成本核算在外科手术干预经济分析中的应用:一项系统评价。
Health Econ Rev. 2020 Jan 29;10(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13561-020-0260-8.
5
Integrating clinical and economic evidence in clinical guidelines: More needed than ever!将临床证据和经济证据整合到临床指南中:比以往任何时候都更需要!
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Aug;25(4):561-564. doi: 10.1111/jep.12936. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
6
The ETTAA study protocol: a UK-wide observational study of 'Effective Treatments for Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm'.ETTAA研究方案:一项在英国范围内开展的关于“胸主动脉瘤有效治疗方法”的观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Jun 2;5(6):e008147. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008147.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials II-An ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force report.与临床试验并行的成本效益分析II——一份药物经济学与结果研究协会良好研究实践工作组报告
Value Health. 2015 Mar;18(2):161-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.02.001.
8
Cost analysis of endovascular versus open repair in the treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms.胸主动脉瘤治疗中血管内修复与开放修复的成本分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Mar;61(3):596-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.09.009. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
9
Outcomes after endovascular or open repair for degenerative descending thoracic aortic aneurysm using linked hospital data.采用关联医院数据的退行性胸降主动脉瘤血管内或开放修复术后的结果。
Br J Surg. 2014 Sep;101(10):1244-51. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9568. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
10
Costing hospital surgery services: the method matters.医院手术服务成本核算:方法很重要。
PLoS One. 2014 May 9;9(5):e97290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097290. eCollection 2014.