State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, 14#, 3rd section, Renmin South Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Dec 15;23(1):859. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04570-1.
This cross-sectional study evaluated the impacts of functional tooth loss on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) among elderly people compared with the impacts of several common indicators of oral health. Additionally, the cut-off of functional tooth loss needed for a better OHRQoL was investigated to establish a new measure for successful oral ageing.
Data from people aged 65-74 were extracted from the Fourth National Oral Health Survey in Sichuan, China. Functional tooth loss was defined as both natural tooth loss and nonfunctional teeth, such as third molars, residual roots, and removable dentures. The cut-offs of tooth loss were first identified as 12, based on the previous definition of functional dentition (≥20 natural teeth except the third molars), and 14, 16, or 18 for further investigation. OHRQoL was evaluated by the standardized Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (sGOHAI) score. Logistic regression was performed to estimate the impacts on OHRQoL. Additionally, subgroup analyses were conducted using the stratified chi-square test to explore the effect of functional tooth loss at each position.
The mean GOHAI score of the 744 participants was 48.25 ± 7.62. Elderly people who had lost ≤12 functional teeth had greater odds of reporting a higher sGOHAI score than those who had lost more functional teeth (odds ratio (OR) 1.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-2.11). No significant difference in the sGOHAI score was detected between people who had lost 13-16 functional teeth and those who had lost ≤12 functional teeth (0.61, 0.35-1.07). The loss of second premolars and first and second molars had great impacts on the sGOHAI score when ≤12 or ≤ 16 functional teeth had been lost.
Compared with natural tooth loss, functional dentition and occluding pairs, functional tooth loss can be a better indicator of OHRQoL in the elderly population. Sixteen remaining functional teeth seem to be sufficient to maintain good OHRQoL and successful oral ageing despite that number being previously acknowledged as ≥20 teeth.
本横断面研究评估了功能性牙齿缺失对老年人口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)的影响,并与几种常见的口腔健康指标进行了比较。此外,还研究了功能性牙齿缺失对 OHRQoL 的影响,以确定更好的 OHRQoL 的临界点,并建立新的成功口腔老龄化衡量标准。
从中国四川省第四次全国口腔健康调查中提取了 65-74 岁人群的数据。功能性牙齿缺失被定义为天然牙齿缺失和非功能性牙齿缺失,如第三磨牙、残根和可摘义齿。首先根据功能性牙列(除第三磨牙外,至少有 20 颗天然牙)的先前定义,将牙齿缺失的临界点确定为 12,并进一步调查确定为 14、16 或 18。OHRQoL 通过标准化老年人口腔健康评估指数(sGOHAI)评分进行评估。使用逻辑回归估计对 OHRQoL 的影响。此外,还使用分层卡方检验进行了亚组分析,以探讨每个位置的功能性牙齿缺失的影响。
744 名参与者的平均 GOHAI 得分为 48.25±7.62。与缺失更多功能性牙齿的老年人相比,缺失≤12 颗功能性牙齿的老年人报告 sGOHAI 评分更高的可能性更大(比值比(OR)1.49,95%置信区间(CI)1.05-2.11)。缺失 13-16 颗功能性牙齿的老年人与缺失≤12 颗功能性牙齿的老年人之间 sGOHAI 评分无显著差异(0.61,0.35-1.07)。当缺失≤12 或≤16 颗功能性牙齿时,第二前磨牙、第一和第二磨牙的缺失对 sGOHAI 评分有很大影响。
与天然牙齿缺失相比,功能性牙列和咬合对,功能性牙齿缺失可能是老年人 OHRQoL 的更好指标。尽管先前认为有≥20 颗牙齿就足以维持良好的 OHRQoL 和成功的口腔老龄化,但 16 颗剩余的功能性牙齿似乎足以维持良好的 OHRQoL 和成功的口腔老龄化。