• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全国范围内微创右半结肠癌切除术的标准化及基于视频的能力评估工具的开发和验证(RIGHT 研究)。

Nationwide standardization of minimally invasive right hemicolectomy for colon cancer and development and validation of a video-based competency assessment tool (the Right study).

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 3;111(1). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad404.

DOI:10.1093/bjs/znad404
PMID:38103184
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10763527/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Substantial variation exists when performing a minimally invasive right hemicolectomy (MIRH) due to disparities in training, expertise and differences in implementation of innovations. This study aimed to achieve national consensus on an optimal and standardized MIRH technique for colon cancer and to develop and validate a video-based competency assessment tool (CAT) for MIRH.

METHOD

Statements covering all elements of MIRH were formulated. Subsequently, the Delphi technique was used to reach consensus on a standardized MIRH among 76 colorectal surgeons from 43 different centres. A CAT was developed based on the Delphi results. Nine surgeons assessed the same 12 unedited full-length videos using the CAT, allowing evaluation of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

After three Delphi rounds, consensus (≥80% agreement) was achieved on 23 of the 24 statements. Consensus statements included the use of low intra-abdominal pressure, detailed anatomical outline how to perform complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation, the creation of an intracorporeal anastomosis, and specimen extraction through a Pfannenstiel incision using a wound protector. The CAT included seven consecutive steps to measure competency of the MIRH and showed high consistency among surgeons with an overall ICC of 0.923.

CONCLUSION

Nationwide consensus on a standardized and optimized technique of MIRH was reached. The CAT developed showed excellent interrater reliability. These achievements are crucial steps to an ongoing nationwide quality improvement project (the Right study).

摘要

背景

由于培训、专业知识的差异以及创新实施方式的不同,微创右半结肠切除术(MIRH)的操作存在很大差异。本研究旨在就结肠癌的最佳和标准化 MIRH 技术达成全国共识,并开发和验证一种基于视频的 MIRH 能力评估工具(CAT)。

方法

制定了涵盖 MIRH 所有要素的陈述。随后,采用德尔菲技术,由来自 43 个不同中心的 76 名结直肠外科医生对标准化 MIRH 达成共识。基于德尔菲的结果开发了 CAT。9 名外科医生使用 CAT 评估了相同的 12 个未经编辑的全长视频,从而评估了组内相关系数(ICC)。

结果

经过三轮德尔菲调查,对 24 项陈述中的 23 项达成了共识(≥80%的一致意见)。达成共识的陈述包括使用低腹腔内压、详细的解剖轮廓以完成完整的结肠系膜切除术和中央血管结扎、创建腔内吻合以及通过使用伤口保护器的 Pfannenstiel 切口提取标本。CAT 包括七个连续步骤,用于衡量 MIRH 的能力,并且外科医生之间的一致性很高,总体 ICC 为 0.923。

结论

就标准化和优化的 MIRH 技术达成了全国共识。开发的 CAT 显示出良好的评分者间可靠性。这些成果是正在进行的全国质量改进项目(Right 研究)的重要步骤。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0b4/10763527/1cba352a33a9/znad404f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0b4/10763527/91ee3a10bfbd/znad404f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0b4/10763527/2ac5ee8f15bc/znad404f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0b4/10763527/1cba352a33a9/znad404f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0b4/10763527/91ee3a10bfbd/znad404f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0b4/10763527/2ac5ee8f15bc/znad404f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0b4/10763527/1cba352a33a9/znad404f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Nationwide standardization of minimally invasive right hemicolectomy for colon cancer and development and validation of a video-based competency assessment tool (the Right study).全国范围内微创右半结肠癌切除术的标准化及基于视频的能力评估工具的开发和验证(RIGHT 研究)。
Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 3;111(1). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad404.
2
Achieving high quality standards in laparoscopic colon resection for cancer: A Delphi consensus-based position paper.实现腹腔镜结肠癌切除术的高质量标准:基于德尔菲共识的立场文件。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Apr;44(4):469-483. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.091.
3
Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.右半结肠切除术中体内吻合与体外吻合的系统评价和荟萃分析
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):64-77. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4982-y. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
4
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
5
Standardizing the Definition of Each Colon Cancer Segment: Delphi Consensus on Clinical Decision-Making for Oncologic Outcomes.规范各结肠癌节段的定义:关于肿瘤学结局临床决策的德尔菲共识
Dis Colon Rectum. 2025 Apr 11. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003739.
6
Control interventions in randomised trials among people with mental health disorders.精神障碍患者随机试验中的对照干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 4;4(4):MR000050. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000050.pub2.
7
Definition and reporting of lymphadenectomy and complete mesocolic excision for radical right colectomy: a systematic review.根治性右半结肠切除术的淋巴结清扫术和完整结肠系膜切除术的定义和报告:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):846-861. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09548-5. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
9
Diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma.染色体臂 1p 和 19q 缺失的检测在胶质瘤患者中的诊断准确性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 2;3(3):CD013387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013387.pub2.
10
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Vascular pedicle dissection time in laparoscopic colectomies as a novel marker of surgical skill: a prospective cohort study.腹腔镜结肠切除术中血管蒂解剖时间作为手术技巧的新指标:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 Mar 22;29(1):82. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03121-7.
2
COLOR IV: a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing intracorporeal and extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy for colon cancer.COLOR IV:一项多中心随机临床试验,比较腹腔镜右半结肠癌切除术后体内与体外回结肠吻合术。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Feb;39(2):1182-1190. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11412-7. Epub 2024 Dec 28.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Video-based tools for surgical quality assessment of technical skills in laparoscopic procedures: a systematic review.基于视频的腹腔镜手术技术技能质量评估工具:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4279-4297. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10076-z. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
2
National implementation of an optimal standardised technique for right-sided colon cancer: protocol of an interventional sequential cohort study (Right study).全国范围内实施优化的标准化右半结肠癌技术:一项干预性序贯队列研究(Right 研究)方案。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Nov;27(11):1083-1090. doi: 10.1007/s10151-023-02801-6. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
3
Association Between Surgical Quality Metric Adherence and Overall Survival Among US Veterans With Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Nationwide variations in the execution of minimally invasive right hemicolectomy and short-term outcomes: first phase of the RIGHT study.
微创右半结肠切除术实施情况及短期结局的全国性差异:RIGHT研究的第一阶段
Br J Surg. 2024 Oct 30;111(11). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae291.
美国早期非小细胞肺癌退伍军人手术质量指标依从性与总生存的相关性。
JAMA Surg. 2023 Mar 1;158(3):293-301. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.6826.
4
The incidence of extraction site incisional hernia after minimally invasive colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创结直肠手术后拔牙部位切口疝的发生率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2023 Apr;25(4):586-599. doi: 10.1111/codi.16455. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
5
Complete mesocolic excision for right colonic cancer: prospective multicentre study.完整结肠系膜切除术治疗右半结肠癌:前瞻性多中心研究。
Br J Surg. 2022 Dec 13;110(1):98-105. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac379.
6
Definition and reporting of lymphadenectomy and complete mesocolic excision for radical right colectomy: a systematic review.根治性右半结肠切除术的淋巴结清扫术和完整结肠系膜切除术的定义和报告:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):846-861. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09548-5. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
7
Quality of Recovery and Innate Immune Homeostasis in Patients Undergoing Low-pressure Versus Standard-pressure Pneumoperitoneum During Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery (RECOVER): A Randomized Controlled Trial.在腹腔镜结直肠手术中采用低压与标准气压气腹对患者术后恢复质量和固有免疫稳态的影响(RECOVER):一项随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2022 Dec 1;276(6):e664-e673. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005491. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
8
Validation study of a skill assessment tool for education and outcome prediction of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.腹腔镜远端胃切除术技能评估工具的验证研究:教育和结果预测
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):8807-8816. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09305-8. Epub 2022 May 16.
9
High Rates of Incisional Hernia After Laparoscopic Right Colectomy With Midline Extraction Site.腹腔镜右半结肠切除经中线取标本术后切口疝发生率高。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2021 Jul 28;31(6):722-728. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000977.
10
Right-side colectomy with complete mesocolic excision vs conventional right-side colectomy in the treatment of colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.右半结肠切除术伴完整结肠系膜切除术与传统右半结肠切除术治疗结肠癌的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Sep;36(9):1885-1904. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03951-5. Epub 2021 May 13.