Suppr超能文献

使用五种不同方法检测支原体的经验。

Experience with testing for mycoplasma with five different methods.

作者信息

Scheirer W, Katinger H W, Laber G

出版信息

Dev Biol Stand. 1979;42:55-9.

PMID:381077
Abstract

Five methods for mycoplasma-content detection in cell-cultures are established in this laboratory. Results with about 20 different cell lines continuously grown in this laboratory in some determinations indicate that four methods give good correspondence. A microbiological method gave contrary results in many cases. It is possible that new infections will grow on mycoplasma broth but the older infections are adapted to cell-culture and give negative results on artificial medium. New low-level infections cannot be detected by the other methods which do not include any efficient enrichment step. The most convenient method in our opinion is a DNA-staining method according to Chen because this is a very quick, inexpensive and easily performable process. In practice it seems necessary to check cell cultures in two ways, firstly with a quick method and additionally with the microbiological test to ensure the detection of new low-level infections.

摘要

本实验室建立了五种细胞培养物中支原体含量的检测方法。在本实验室持续培养的约20种不同细胞系的一些测定结果表明,四种方法结果吻合度良好。微生物学方法在许多情况下得出相反结果。新感染可能在支原体肉汤中生长,但旧感染适应了细胞培养,在人工培养基上呈阴性结果。其他不包括任何有效富集步骤的方法无法检测出新的低水平感染。我们认为最便捷的方法是根据Chen的DNA染色法,因为这是一个非常快速、廉价且易于操作的过程。在实际操作中,似乎有必要通过两种方式检查细胞培养物,首先用快速方法,另外进行微生物学检测,以确保检测出新的低水平感染。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验