Rhodes Sarah, Demou Evangelia, Wilkinson Jack, Cherrie Mark, Edge Rhiannon, Gittins Matthew, Katikireddi Srinivasa Vittal, Kromydas Theocharis, Mueller William, Pearce Neil, van Tongeren Martie
Centre for Biostatistics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Occup Environ Med. 2023 Dec 12;81(1):34-9. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2023-108931.
To assess variation in vaccination uptake across occupational groups as a potential explanation for variation in risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
We analysed data from the UK Office of National Statistics COVID-19 Infection Survey linked to vaccination data from the National Immunisation Management System in England from 1 December 2020 to 11 May 2022. We analysed vaccination uptake and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk by occupational group and assessed whether adjustment for vaccination reduced the variation in risk between occupational groups.
Estimated rates of triple vaccination were high across all occupational groups (80% or above), but were lowest for food processing (80%), personal care (82%), hospitality (83%), manual occupations (84%) and retail (85%). High rates were observed for individuals working in health (95% for office based, 92% for those in patient-facing roles) and education (91%) and office-based workers not included in other categories (90%). The impact of adjusting for vaccination when estimating relative risks of infection was generally modest (ratio of hazard ratios across all occupational groups reduced from 1.37 to 1.32), but was consistent with the hypothesis that low vaccination rates contribute to elevated risk in some groups.
Variation in vaccination coverage might account for a modest proportion of occupational differences in infection risk. Vaccination rates were uniformly very high in this cohort, which may suggest that the participants are not representative of the general population. Accordingly, these results should be considered tentative pending the accumulation of additional evidence.
评估不同职业群体的疫苗接种率差异,以此作为严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染风险差异的一个潜在解释。
我们分析了英国国家统计局新冠感染调查的数据,并将其与2020年12月1日至2022年5月11日英格兰国家免疫管理系统的疫苗接种数据相联系。我们按职业群体分析了疫苗接种率和SARS-CoV-2感染风险,并评估了调整疫苗接种情况是否能减少职业群体间的风险差异。
所有职业群体的加强针接种估计率都很高(80%及以上),但食品加工行业(80%)、个人护理行业(82%)、酒店服务业(83%)、体力劳动职业(84%)和零售业(85%)的接种率最低。卫生行业(办公室工作的为95%,从事面向患者工作的为92%)、教育行业(91%)以及未归入其他类别的办公室工作人员(90%)的接种率较高。在估计感染的相对风险时,调整疫苗接种情况的影响通常不大(所有职业群体的风险比从1.37降至1.32),但这与低疫苗接种率导致某些群体风险升高的假设一致。
疫苗接种覆盖率的差异可能在一定程度上解释了职业感染风险的差异。该队列中的疫苗接种率普遍非常高,这可能表明参与者不能代表一般人群。因此,在积累更多证据之前,这些结果应被视为初步的。