Park Jon, Ahn Dong-Ki, Choi Dae-Jung
Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Seoul Sacred Heart General Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Asian Spine J. 2024 Apr;18(2):301-323. doi: 10.31616/asj.2023.0409. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
Decompression is a major component of surgical procedures for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). In addition to sufficient decompression to guarantee the relief of neurological pain, compensating surgical instability after wider laminectomy and foraminotomy and instrumentation with caging and fusion with grafting are performed to secure or restore the foraminal dimension and correct coronal/sagittal imbalance for longer survival of the adjacent segment. Endoscopic spinal surgery (ESS) has been developed under the flag of successful decompression while preserving structural integrity as much as possible with the help of magnification and illumination. ESS provides a technical possibility and feasibility for solving LSS by decompression alone. Recently, many endoscopic trials have been conducted to overcome conventional surgical treatment that requires wider dissection, escape inevitable complications from surgical damage, and compensate for the fusion technique. However, biportal ESS has some technical limitations, including clinical difficulties in accessibility for more moderate to severe stenosis and challenges for complicated conditions with segmental ventral slip, isthmic defect, stenosis combined with foraminal stenosis or foraminal disk rupture, or degenerative segmental scoliosis with disk height collapsing and endplate fatigue fracture. Because decompression alone is a skill for eliminating pathologies, there is no function of preserving degenerative structure or stopping the recurrence of disk degeneration or subsidence. This review of clinical reports investigated the possibility of biportal ESS for treating degenerative lumbar disorders by sufficient decompression and adequate elimination of various pathologies and decreasing technical complications. The results of this study may help develop better innovative spinal surgical techniques in the near future.
减压是退行性腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)外科手术的主要组成部分。除了进行充分减压以确保神经痛得到缓解外,还需在更广泛的椎板切除术和椎间孔切开术后补偿手术造成的不稳定,并采用椎间融合器进行内固定以及植骨融合,以确保或恢复椎间孔尺寸,纠正冠状面/矢状面失衡,从而延长相邻节段的生存期。内镜脊柱手术(ESS)是在成功减压的前提下发展起来的,借助放大和照明尽可能保留结构完整性。ESS为仅通过减压解决LSS提供了技术可能性和可行性。最近,已经进行了许多内镜试验,以克服传统手术治疗需要更广泛的解剖、避免手术损伤不可避免的并发症以及弥补融合技术等问题。然而,双孔ESS存在一些技术局限性,包括对于中度至重度狭窄在临床操作上难以接近,以及对于伴有节段性椎体滑脱、峡部裂、狭窄合并椎间孔狭窄或椎间孔椎间盘破裂、或伴有椎间盘高度塌陷和终板疲劳骨折的退行性节段性脊柱侧弯等复杂情况面临挑战。由于单纯减压只是一种消除病变的技术,不存在保留退变结构或阻止椎间盘退变或下沉复发的功能。这篇临床报告综述研究了双孔ESS通过充分减压和充分消除各种病变以及减少技术并发症来治疗退行性腰椎疾病的可能性。本研究结果可能有助于在不久的将来开发出更好的创新性脊柱外科技术。