Cataract Department, Narayana Nethralaya, Rajajinagar, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Imaging Biomechanics and Mathematical Modelling Solutions Lab, Narayana Nethralaya, Bommasandra, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan 1;72(1):56-62. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1332_23. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
To compare the ease of visualization and comfort of the surgeon during phacoemulsification surgery using NGENUITY® 3D (NG) visualization system and standard operating microscope (SOM).
In this prospective, randomized, single-blind, single-center study, patients undergoing phacoemulsification surgery by one of the five surgeons were randomly assigned to two groups based on the visualization modality-NG and SOM. Ease of visualization and comfort of the surgeon was assessed using a 27-parameter in-house Surgeon Comfort Score questionnaire.
A total of 224 phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantations were performed in senile immature cataract (SIMC, n = 174) and mature cataract patients (MC, n = 50). Surgeon's ease of visualization (4.92-5.00) and hand-eye coordination score (4.97-5.00) were comparable between the NG- and SOM-groups. Postoperative neck discomfort was lower in both the groups, with a relatively lower discomfort in the NG-group (score: 1.04 vs 1.56). The Spearman rank correlation coefficient (r) between illumination of the operation theatre room and the surgical field revealed a weak negative correlation for most of the patients in the NG-group, and a positive correlation for patients in the SOM-group. No correlation was obtained between brightness of the surgical field and comfort with the surgical field brightness.
Similar ease of visualization was experienced by the surgeons using NG- and SOM-system. Neck discomfort postsurgery was numerically lower in the NG-group, although not significant. Additionally, the NG-system permitted the safe performance of phacoemulsification using a lower surgical field illumination.
比较使用 NGENUITY® 3D(NG)可视化系统和标准手术显微镜(SOM)进行白内障超声乳化手术时的可视化和手术医生舒适度。
在这项前瞻性、随机、单盲、单中心研究中,根据可视化方式(NG 或 SOM),将由五名外科医生之一进行白内障超声乳化手术的患者随机分为两组。使用 27 项参数的内部外科医生舒适度评分问卷评估可视化的容易程度和手术医生的舒适度。
共对 174 例老年性未成熟白内障(SIMC)和 50 例成熟白内障患者进行了 224 例白内障超声乳化联合人工晶状体植入术。NG 组和 SOM 组的手术医生可视化(4.92-5.00)和手眼协调评分(4.97-5.00)相当。两组术后颈部不适均较低,NG 组相对较低(评分:1.04 比 1.56)。手术间照明与手术野之间的 Spearman 秩相关系数(r)显示,对于大多数 NG 组患者,呈弱负相关,而对于 SOM 组患者,呈正相关。手术野亮度与手术野亮度舒适度之间未得到相关性。
使用 NG-和 SOM 系统,手术医生的可视化体验相似。尽管不显著,但 NG 组术后颈部不适程度略低。此外,NG 系统允许在较低的手术野照明下安全地进行白内障超声乳化手术。