DST/NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) Centre for Tuberculosis Research, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, National Institute for Health Research, Imperial College London, London, UK.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2024 Feb 1;79(2):211-240. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkad372.
Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections are increasing in incidence and associated mortality. NTM are naturally resistant to a variety of antibiotics, complicating treatment. We conducted a literature assessment on the efficacy of bedaquiline in treating NTM species in vitro and in vivo (animal models and humans); meta-analyses were performed where possible.
Four databases were searched using specific terms. Publications were included according to predefined criteria. Bedaquiline's impact on NTM in vitro, MICs and epidemiological cut-off (ECOFF) values were evaluated. A meta-analysis of bedaquiline efficacy against NTM infections in animal models was performed. Culture conversion, cure and/or relapse-free cure were used to evaluate the efficacy of bedaquiline in treating NTM infection in humans.
Fifty studies met the inclusion criteria: 33 assessed bedaquiline's impact on NTM in vitro, 9 in animal models and 8 in humans. Three studies assessed bedaquiline's efficacy both in vitro and in vivo. Due to data paucity, an ECOFF value of 0.5 mg/mL was estimated for Mycobacterium abscessus only. Meta-analysis of animal studies showed a 1.86× reduction in bacterial load in bedaquiline-treated versus no treatment within 30 days. In humans, bedaquiline-including regimens were effective in treating NTM extrapulmonary infection but not pulmonary infection.
Bedaquiline demonstrated strong antibacterial activity against various NTM species and is a promising drug to treat NTM infections. However, data on the genomic mutations associated with bedaquiline resistance were scarce, preventing statistical analyses for most mutations and NTM species. Further studies are urgently needed to better inform treatment strategies.
非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)感染的发病率和相关死亡率正在上升。NTM 天然对抗多种抗生素,这使得治疗变得复杂。我们对贝达喹啉治疗 NTM 种体外和体内(动物模型和人类)的疗效进行了文献评估;在可能的情况下进行了荟萃分析。
使用特定术语搜索了四个数据库。根据预设标准纳入出版物。评估了贝达喹啉对 NTM 体外的影响、MIC 和流行病学截断值(ECOFF)值。对贝达喹啉治疗动物模型 NTM 感染的疗效进行了荟萃分析。使用培养物转换、治愈和/或无复发治愈来评估贝达喹啉治疗 NTM 感染的疗效。
符合纳入标准的有 50 项研究:33 项评估了贝达喹啉对 NTM 的体外影响,9 项在动物模型中,8 项在人类中。三项研究评估了贝达喹啉在体外和体内的疗效。由于数据缺乏,仅估计了 0.5mg/ml 作为脓肿分枝杆菌的 ECOFF 值。动物研究的荟萃分析显示,贝达喹啉治疗组与无治疗组相比,在 30 天内细菌负荷减少了 1.86 倍。在人类中,贝达喹啉包括方案在治疗非肺部 NTM 感染方面是有效的,但对肺部感染无效。
贝达喹啉对各种 NTM 种具有很强的抗菌活性,是治疗 NTM 感染的有前途的药物。然而,与贝达喹啉耐药相关的基因突变数据稀缺,大多数突变和 NTM 种无法进行统计分析。迫切需要进一步的研究来更好地为治疗策略提供信息。