Australian Rivers Institute, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Road, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia.
Australian Rivers Institute, School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Road, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia; NSW Department of Primary Industries, Wollongbar, New South Wales, Australia.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Feb 20;912:169544. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169544. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
Environmental disturbances such as drought can impact soil health and the resistance (ability to withstand environmental stress) and resilience (ability to recover functional and structural integrity after stress) of soil microbial functional activities. A paucity of information exists on the impact of drought on soil microbiome and how soil biological systems respond to and demonstrate resilience to drought stress. To address this, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis (using only laboratory studies) to assess the response of soil microbial biomass and respiration to drought stress across agriculture, forest, and grassland ecosystems. The meta-analysis revealed an overall negative response of microbial biomass in resistance (-31.6 %) and resilience (-0.3 %) to drought, suggesting a decrease in soil microbial biomass content. Soil microbial respiration also showed a negative response in resistance to drought stress indicating a decrease in soil microbial respiration in agriculture (-17.5 %), forest (-64.0 %), and grassland (-65.5 %) ecosystems. However, it showed a positive response in resilience to drought, suggesting an effective recovery in microbial respiration post-drought. Soil organic carbon (SOC), clay content, and pH were the main regulating factors of the responses of soil microbial biomass and respiration to drought. In agriculture ecosystem, soil pH was primarily correlated with soil microbial respiration resistance and resilience to drought, potentially influenced by frequent land preparation and fertilizer applications, while in forest ecosystem SOC, clay content, and pH significantly impacted microbial biomass and respiration resistance and resilience. In grassland ecosystem, SOC was strongly associated with biomass resilience to drought. The impact of drought stress on soil microbiome showed different patterns in natural and agriculture ecosystems, and the magnitude of microbial functional responses regulated by soil intrinsic properties. This study highlighted the importance of understanding the role of soil properties in shaping microbial responses to drought stress for better ecosystem management.
环境干扰,如干旱,会影响土壤健康以及土壤微生物功能活动的抵抗力(承受环境压力的能力)和恢复力(在压力后恢复功能和结构完整性的能力)。关于干旱对土壤微生物组的影响以及土壤生物系统如何对干旱压力做出响应并表现出恢复力,我们的了解还很有限。为了解决这个问题,我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析(仅使用实验室研究),以评估土壤微生物生物量和呼吸对农业、森林和草原生态系统中干旱胁迫的响应。荟萃分析显示,微生物生物量对干旱胁迫的抵抗力(-31.6%)和恢复力(-0.3%)总体呈负响应,表明土壤微生物生物量含量减少。土壤微生物呼吸对干旱胁迫的抵抗力也呈负响应,表明农业(-17.5%)、森林(-64.0%)和草原(-65.5%)生态系统中土壤微生物呼吸减少。然而,它在对干旱的恢复力方面呈正响应,表明在干旱后土壤微生物呼吸得到了有效恢复。土壤有机碳(SOC)、粘粒含量和 pH 是土壤微生物生物量和呼吸对干旱响应的主要调节因素。在农业生态系统中,土壤 pH 主要与土壤微生物呼吸对干旱的抵抗力和恢复力相关,这可能受到频繁的土地准备和施肥的影响,而在森林生态系统中,SOC、粘粒含量和 pH 显著影响微生物生物量和呼吸对干旱的抵抗力和恢复力。在草原生态系统中,SOC 与微生物生物量对干旱的恢复力密切相关。干旱胁迫对土壤微生物组的影响在自然和农业生态系统中表现出不同的模式,以及土壤固有特性对微生物功能响应的调节幅度。本研究强调了理解土壤特性在塑造微生物对干旱胁迫响应方面的重要性,以便更好地进行生态系统管理。