Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis.
Research Care Training Program, Centre for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Kisumu, Kenya.
NEJM Evid. 2023 Apr;2(4). doi: 10.1056/evidoa2200076. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
Optimizing retention in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment may require sequential behavioral interventions based on patients' response.
In a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial in Kenya, we randomly assigned adults initiating HIV treatment to standard of care (SOC), Short Message Service (SMS) messages, or conditional cash transfers (CCT). Those with retention lapse (missed a clinic visit by ≥14 days) were randomly assigned again to standard-of-care outreach (SOC-Outreach), SMS+CCT, or peer navigation. Those randomly assigned to SMS or CCT who did not lapse after 1 year were randomly assigned again to either stop or continue the initial intervention. Primary outcomes were retention in care without an initial lapse, return to the clinic among those who lapsed, and time in care; secondary outcomes included adjudicated viral suppression. Average treatment effect (ATE) was calculated using targeted maximum likelihood estimation with adjustment for baseline characteristics at randomization and certain time-varying characteristics at rerandomization.
Among 1809 participants, 79.7% of those randomly assigned to CCT (n=523/656), 71.7% to SMS (n=393/548), and 70.7% to SOC (n=428/605) were retained in care in the first year (ATE: 9.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.4%, 14.4% and ATE: 4.2%; 95% CI: -0.7%, 9.2% for CCT and SMS compared with SOC, respectively). Among 312 participants with an initial lapse who were randomly assigned again, 69.1% who were randomly assigned to a navigator (n=76/110) returned, 69.5% randomly assigned to CCT+SMS (n=73/105) returned, and 55.7% randomly assigned to SOC-Outreach (n=54/97) returned (ATE: 14.1%; 95% CI: 0.6%, 27.6% and ATE: 11.4%; 95% CI: -2.2%, 24.9% for navigator and CCT+SMS compared with SOC-Outreach, respectively). Among participants without lapse on SMS, continuing SMS did not affect retention (n=122/180; 67.8% retained) versus stopping (n=151/209; 72.2% retained; ATE: -4.4%; 95% CI: -16.6%, 7.9%). Among participants without lapse on CCT, those continuing CCT had higher retention (n=192/230; 83.5% retained) than those stopping (n=173/287; 60.3% retained; ATE: 28.6%; 95% CI: 19.9%, 37.3%). Among 15 sequenced strategies, initial CCT, escalated to navigator if lapse occurred and continued if no lapse occurred, increased time in care (ATE: 7.2%, 95% CI: 3.7%, 10.7%) and viral suppression (ATE: 8.2%, 95% CI: 2.2%, 14.2%), the most compared with SOC throughout. Initial SMS escalated to navigator if lapse occurred, and otherwise continued, showed similar effect sizes compared with SOC throughout.
Active interventions to prevent retention lapses followed by navigation for those who lapse and maintenance of initial intervention for those without lapse resulted in best overall retention and viral suppression among the strategies studied. Among those who remained in care, discontinuation of CCT, but not SMS, compromised retention and suppression. (Funded by National Institutes of Health grants R01 MH104123, K24 AI134413, and R01 AI074345; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02338739.).
为了优化人类免疫缺陷病毒 (HIV) 治疗的保留率,可能需要根据患者的反应进行一系列基于行为的干预。
在肯尼亚进行的一项序贯多次分配随机试验中,我们将开始接受 HIV 治疗的成年人随机分配至标准护理(SOC)、短信服务(SMS)或现金转移支付(CCT)。对于保留率下降(错过门诊就诊≥14 天)的患者再次随机分配至标准护理外展(SOC-Outreach)、SMS+CCT 或同伴导航。对于在第 1 年内未下降的那些随机分配至 SMS 或 CCT 的患者再次随机分配以停止或继续初始干预。主要结局是无初始下降的保留护理、下降后回到诊所,以及接受护理的时间;次要结局包括裁定的病毒抑制。使用靶向最大似然估计计算平均治疗效果(ATE),并根据随机分组时的基线特征和重新随机分组时的某些时变特征进行调整。
在 1809 名参与者中,随机分配至 CCT(n=523/656)的参与者中,有 79.7%、随机分配至 SMS(n=393/548)的参与者中,有 71.7%,以及随机分配至 SOC(n=428/605)的参与者中,有 70.7%在第一年保留护理(ATE:9.9%;95%置信区间 [CI]:5.4%,14.4% 和 ATE:4.2%;95% CI:-0.7%,9.2%与 SOC 相比,CCT 和 SMS)。在最初下降的 312 名参与者中,再次随机分配的参与者中,随机分配至导航员(n=76/110)的有 69.1%返回,随机分配至 CCT+SMS(n=73/105)的有 69.5%返回,随机分配至 SOC-Outreach(n=54/97)的有 55.7%返回(ATE:14.1%;95% CI:0.6%,27.6% 和 ATE:11.4%;95% CI:-2.2%,24.9%与 SOC-Outreach 相比,导航员和 CCT+SMS)。在没有 SMS 下降的参与者中,继续使用 SMS 不会影响保留率(n=122/180;67.8%保留)与停止使用 SMS(n=151/209;72.2%保留;ATE:-4.4%;95% CI:-16.6%,7.9%)。在没有 CCT 下降的参与者中,继续使用 CCT 的保留率更高(n=192/230;83.5%保留)与停止使用 CCT(n=173/287;60.3%保留;ATE:28.6%;95% CI:19.9%,37.3%)。在 15 种序列策略中,最初的 CCT,在发生下降时升级为导航员,如果没有下降则继续,增加了接受护理的时间(ATE:7.2%;95% CI:3.7%,10.7%)和病毒抑制(ATE:8.2%;95% CI:2.2%,14.2%),与 SOC 相比,这是最有效的。最初的 SMS 上升到如果发生下降则升级为导航员,否则继续,如果与 SOC 相比,整个过程中的效果相似。
对于防止保留下降的积极干预措施,然后对下降的患者进行导航,如果没有下降则继续维持初始干预措施,在研究的策略中,这是最佳的保留率和病毒抑制率。在那些继续接受护理的人中,停止 CCT,但不是 SMS,会损害保留率和抑制率。(由美国国立卫生研究院资助 R01 MH104123、K24 AI134413 和 R01 AI074345;临床试验编号,NCT02338739)。