Suppr超能文献

回应现实世界和假设的薄荷醇口味禁令对美国吸薄荷醇香烟的年轻人的影响。

Responses to Real-World and Hypothetical Menthol Flavor Bans Among US Young Adults Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA.

Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 May 22;26(6):785-789. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad259.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Menthol cigarette bans have been implemented in some US states and localities, and a federal ban is being proposed by the FDA. This study asks how young adults who use menthol cigarettes respond to changes in menthol cigarette availability.

AIMS AND METHODS

An online survey of young adults ages 18-34 who reported smoking menthol cigarettes on ≥7 of 30 days around Thanksgiving 2019 (n = 734), oversampling Massachusetts-the first state with a menthol ban. Participants reported their tobacco use behavior following real-world menthol cigarette bans or predicted their behavior under a hypothetical federal ban.

RESULTS

Most respondents who exclusively smoked versus dual used with e-cigarettes continued smoking/using combustible tobacco following real-world bans (95.3% vs. 86.9%), accessing menthol cigarettes from other jurisdictions. Fewer who smoked exclusively responded by using e-cigarettes compared to those who dual used (3.9% vs. 43.7%). Quitting all tobacco use (ie, no smoking, vaping, or any tobacco use) was uncommon for both groups (3.6% vs. 9.0%). Under a hypothetical ban, majorities of those who exclusively smoke and who dual use predicted they would continue smoking (72.2% vs. 71.8%); fewer who smoke exclusively would use e-cigarettes compared to those who dual use (14.7% vs. 41.4%). Those who smoke exclusively were more likely to report quitting all tobacco compared to those who dual use (29.6% vs. 12.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Under real-world and hypothetical menthol cigarette bans, most respondents continued smoking. However, more young adults continued smoking following real-world bans, reflecting the limitations of local/state restrictions when menthol cigarettes are available in other jurisdictions.

IMPLICATIONS

This survey asked young adults who use menthol cigarettes how they responded to real-world changes in the availability of menthol cigarettes; 89% reported continuing to smoke. Those who smoked exclusively were far less likely to respond by switching to e-cigarettes compared to people who dual used both products. Under a hypothetical federal menthol cigarette ban, 72% of young adults predicted that they would continue smoking. Quitting all tobacco was less common in the real-world scenario compared to the hypothetical ban. Access to menthol cigarettes in other jurisdictions and flavored cigars likely dampen the public health benefit of menthol cigarette bans.

摘要

简介

美国的一些州和地方已经实施了薄荷醇香烟禁令,而 FDA 也正在提议进行联邦禁令。本研究旨在了解仅使用薄荷醇香烟或同时使用薄荷醇香烟和电子烟的年轻人对薄荷醇香烟供应变化的反应。

目的和方法

对 2019 年感恩节前 30 天内报告每天至少吸 7 支薄荷醇香烟的 18-34 岁年轻人(n=734)进行了一项在线调查,对马萨诸塞州(第一个实施薄荷醇禁令的州)进行了抽样调查。参与者报告了在现实世界中的薄荷醇香烟禁令实施后或在假设的联邦禁令下他们的烟草使用行为。

结果

与同时使用电子烟的双用户相比,大多数仅吸薄荷醇香烟的受访者在现实世界中的禁令实施后继续吸烟/使用可燃烟草(95.3%比 86.9%),他们从其他司法管辖区获得薄荷醇香烟。与同时使用电子烟的双用户相比,较少仅吸薄荷醇香烟的受访者转而使用电子烟(3.9%比 43.7%)。两组人群中,戒烟(即不吸烟、吸电子烟或任何烟草制品)的比例都很低(3.6%比 9.0%)。在假设的禁令下,大多数仅吸薄荷醇香烟和同时使用电子烟的人预测他们将继续吸烟(72.2%比 71.8%);与同时使用电子烟的双用户相比,仅吸薄荷醇香烟的人使用电子烟的比例较低(14.7%比 41.4%)。与同时使用电子烟的双用户相比,仅吸薄荷醇香烟的人更有可能报告戒烟(29.6%比 12.4%)。

结论

在现实世界和假设的薄荷醇香烟禁令下,大多数受访者继续吸烟。然而,与仅吸薄荷醇香烟的受访者相比,更多的年轻成年人在现实世界中的禁令实施后继续吸烟,这反映了在其他司法管辖区可以获得薄荷醇香烟时,地方/州的限制存在局限性。

意义

本调查询问了使用薄荷醇香烟的年轻人在薄荷醇香烟供应情况发生实际变化时的反应;89%的人报告继续吸烟。与同时使用两种产品的人相比,仅吸薄荷醇香烟的人更不可能转而使用电子烟。在假设的联邦薄荷醇香烟禁令下,72%的年轻人预测他们将继续吸烟。在现实世界的情况下,与假设的禁令相比,戒烟的情况较少。在其他司法管辖区获得薄荷醇香烟和调味雪茄可能会削弱薄荷醇香烟禁令的公共卫生效益。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Young Adults as a Tobacco Control Priority Population in the US.美国将青年成年人作为烟草控制重点人群。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2019365. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19365.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验