• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与母语相比,弱势群体成员在使用主导群体的语言时会对自己的群体感到更加自豪。

Disadvantaged group members are prouder of their group when using the language of the dominant group compared to their native language.

机构信息

Department of Sociology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.

Baruch Ivcher School of Psychology, Reichman University (IDC Herzliya), Herzliya 4610101, Israel.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jan 2;121(1):e2307736120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2307736120. Epub 2023 Dec 26.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2307736120
PMID:38147544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10769828/
Abstract

In ethnically and linguistically diverse societies, disadvantaged groups often face pressures to acquire and speak the advantaged group's language to achieve social inclusion and economic mobility. This work investigates how using the advantaged group's language affects disadvantaged group members' in-group pride and collective self-esteem, relative to using their native language. Across six experimental studies involving Palestinian citizens of Israel (total = 1,348), we test two competing hypotheses: Disadvantaged group members may experience greater in-group pride when using a) their native language, due to its emotional significance (the ), or b) the language of the advantaged group, due to activation of habituated compensatory responses to dominance relations (the ). We found that respondents reported significantly higher in-group pride when responding to a Hebrew survey when compared to performing the same activity in Arabic (Studies 1a and 1b), regardless of whether the researchers administering the survey were identified as Jewish or Arab (Studies 2a and 2b). Study 3 replicated this effect while employing the "bogus pipeline" technique, suggesting the pride expression was authentic, not merely driven by social desirability. Finally, Study 4 (pre-registered) examined additional measures of positive regard for the in-group, finding that participants described their group more positively in an attribute selection task, and reported greater collective self-esteem, when surveyed in Hebrew, rather than in Arabic. Taken together, these findings suggest that language use influences disadvantaged group members' perceptions and feelings concerning their group when those languages are associated with relative position in an intergroup hierarchy.

摘要

在种族和语言多样化的社会中,弱势群体往往面临着学习和使用优势群体语言的压力,以实现社会包容和经济流动。这项工作调查了使用优势群体的语言如何影响弱势群体成员的群体自豪感和集体自尊心,相对于使用他们的母语。通过涉及以色列巴勒斯坦公民的六项实验研究(总计 = 1348),我们检验了两个相互竞争的假设:弱势群体成员在使用 a)他们的母语时可能会感到更高的群体自豪感,因为母语具有情感意义(即),或者 b)使用优势群体的语言,因为习惯化的补偿反应对支配关系的激活(即)。我们发现,与用阿拉伯语回答相同的问题相比,参与者在以希伯来语回答调查时报告的群体自豪感明显更高(研究 1a 和 1b),无论管理调查的研究人员是否被认定为犹太裔或阿拉伯裔(研究 2a 和 2b)。研究 3 复制了这一效应,同时采用了“虚假管道”技术,表明这种自豪感表达是真实的,而不仅仅是出于社会期望的驱动。最后,研究 4(预先注册)考察了对群体的积极评价的其他措施,发现参与者在属性选择任务中更积极地描述了他们的群体,并且在以希伯来语进行调查时,而不是在阿拉伯语中,报告了更高的集体自尊心。总之,这些发现表明,语言使用影响弱势群体成员对群体的看法和感受,特别是当这些语言与群体在群体层次结构中的相对地位相关联时。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a315/10769828/ef669ae41d52/pnas.2307736120fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a315/10769828/6f9045c47d20/pnas.2307736120fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a315/10769828/591034ca4ea7/pnas.2307736120fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a315/10769828/68c73ebf55c3/pnas.2307736120fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a315/10769828/ef669ae41d52/pnas.2307736120fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a315/10769828/6f9045c47d20/pnas.2307736120fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a315/10769828/591034ca4ea7/pnas.2307736120fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a315/10769828/68c73ebf55c3/pnas.2307736120fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a315/10769828/ef669ae41d52/pnas.2307736120fig04.jpg

相似文献

1
Disadvantaged group members are prouder of their group when using the language of the dominant group compared to their native language.与母语相比,弱势群体成员在使用主导群体的语言时会对自己的群体感到更加自豪。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jan 2;121(1):e2307736120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2307736120. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
2
Is Martin Luther King or Malcolm X the more acceptable face of protest? High-status groups' reactions to low-status groups' collective action.马丁·路德·金或马尔科姆·X,谁是更能被接受的抗议者形象?高地位群体对低地位群体集体行动的反应。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 May;118(5):919-944. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000195. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
3
Mobilizing or Sedative Effects? A Narrative Review of the Association Between Intergroup Contact and Collective Action Among Advantaged and Disadvantaged Groups.动员还是镇静作用?——优势群体与弱势群体之间的群体间接触与集体行动之间的关联的叙事性综述。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2024 May;28(2):119-180. doi: 10.1177/10888683231203141. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
4
Advantaged group's emotional reactions to intergroup inequality: the dynamics of pride, guilt, and sympathy.优势群体对群体间不平等的情绪反应:自豪、内疚和同情的动态变化
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Jan;34(1):115-29. doi: 10.1177/0146167207309193.
5
The effect of group status on children's hierarchy-reinforcing beliefs.群体地位对儿童等级强化信念的影响。
Dev Sci. 2023 Nov;26(6):e13393. doi: 10.1111/desc.13393. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
6
"Is Martin Luther King or Malcolm X the more acceptable face of protest? High-status groups' reactions to low-status groups' collective action": Correction to Teixeira, Spears, and Yzerbyt (2019).“马丁·路德·金或马尔科姆·X 哪一个是更能被接受的抗议面孔?高地位群体对低地位群体集体行动的反应”:对特谢拉、斯皮尔斯和泽尔比(2019)的更正。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 May;118(5):944. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000205. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
7
Validation of the Arabic and Hebrew versions of the Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale (U-MICS).验证阿拉伯文和希伯来文版的乌得勒支身份承诺管理量表(U-MICS)。
J Adolesc. 2020 Feb;79:11-15. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.12.006. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
8
Pride: The Emotional Foundation of Social Rank Attainment.骄傲:社会地位获得的情感基础。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2023 Jan 18;74:519-545. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-032720-040321.
9
"My Aim Is True": An Attribution-Identity Model of Ally Sincerity.《“我的目标是真诚的”:盟友真诚的归因-身份模型》
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2024 Sep 16:10888683241273354. doi: 10.1177/10888683241273354.
10
Emotions are not always contagious: Longitudinal spreading of self-pride and group pride in homogeneous and status-differentiated groups.情绪并非总是具有传染性:自尊和群体自豪感在同质群体和地位有差异的群体中的纵向传播。
Cogn Emot. 2016;30(1):101-16. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1018143. Epub 2015 Mar 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Language Context and Cultural Identity on the Pain Experience of Spanish-English Bilinguals.语言环境和文化身份对西班牙语-英语双语者疼痛体验的影响。
Affect Sci. 2020 Jun;2(2):112-127. doi: 10.1007/s42761-020-00021-x. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
2
A Rose by Any Other Name? A Subtle Linguistic Cue Impacts Anger and Corresponding Policy Support in Intractable Conflict.换个称呼的玫瑰?微妙语言线索影响棘手冲突中的愤怒情绪和相应政策支持。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Jun;29(6):972-983. doi: 10.1177/0956797618772823. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
3
The Dynamics of Compensation: When Ingroup Favoritism Paves the Way for Outgroup Praise.
群体内偏爱如何为群体外赞扬铺平道路:补偿的动态变化。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 May;43(5):587-600. doi: 10.1177/0146167216689066. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
4
Emotionality differences between a native and foreign language: theoretical implications.母语与外语之间的情感差异:理论启示
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 23;5:1055. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01055. eCollection 2014.
5
Using abstract language signals power.使用抽象语言能彰显力量。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014 Jul;107(1):41-55. doi: 10.1037/a0036626.
6
Social identity performance: extending the strategic side of SIDE.社会身份表现:拓展社会认同与群体动力学理论(SIDE)的策略层面
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2007 Feb;11(1):28-45. doi: 10.1177/1088868306294588.
7
Language as context for the perception of emotion.语言作为情感感知的背景。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Aug;11(8):327-32. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.003. Epub 2007 Jul 10.
8
Subtle linguistic cues affect children's motivation.微妙的语言线索会影响孩子的积极性。
Psychol Sci. 2007 Apr;18(4):314-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01896.x.
9
The psychological structure of pride: a tale of two facets.骄傲的心理结构:关于两个方面的故事。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Mar;92(3):506-25. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.506.
10
Who wants to know? The effect of audience on identity expression among minority group members.谁想知道?受众对少数群体成员身份表达的影响。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2003 Jun;42(Pt 2):299-318. doi: 10.1348/014466603322127265.