Sheikh-Oleslami Sara, Tao Brendan, Papp Bettina, Luthra Shreya, Papp Anthony
Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Faculty of Science, Capilano University, North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Feb;12(1):576-582. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01897-8. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
The demographic proportions of plastic surgery trials approximating real-world disease have not well been studied. Judicious trial representation is essential in evaluation of treatments across diverse patient populations. Herein, we investigate sex, racial, and ethnic disparities in patient enrollment across burn trials.
Cross-sectional analysis of participants enrolled in high-quality, with reduced risk of bias, randomized controlled trials (RCT) on burns registered on clinicaltrials.gov under the query "burn." Completed RCTs reporting at least two demographic groups, employing double masking or greater, and with results accessible through the registry or publications were included. Trial characteristics (sponsor country, site location, initiation year, study phase, masking) and demographic data (sex, race, ethnicity per US reporting guidelines) were collected. The Global Burden of Disease database provided sex-based burn disease burdens. The primary outcome was the population-to-prevalence ratio of enrolled female participants. Secondary outcomes included representation of racial and ethnic populations as related to study blinding, phase, and study/sponsor locations.
Of 546 records, 39 trials met the inclusion criteria (2919 participants). All trials reported sex demographics, with females comprising 37.02% of all participants (PPR = 0.71, 95% CI [0.59, 0.82], likely indicating underrepresentation against their empiric disease burden). Only 7 and 9 trials reported ethnicity and race, respectively, although not comprehensively. Among trials reporting race or ethnicity, Caucasians and Black persons comprised 57.52% and 21.80% of participants, respectively, while only 9.80% had Hispanic/Latino ethnicity. Severe underreporting of race and ethnicity precluded much of secondary significance testing across study variables.
Females are likely underrepresented in high-quality, US-registered burn trials, unreflective of their real-world disease burden. Further, severe underreporting of race and ethnicity was noted. Future trials should enroll diverse demographics and equitable populations for promotion of study generalizability.
尚未对接近现实世界疾病情况的整形手术试验的人口统计学比例进行充分研究。明智的试验代表性对于评估不同患者群体的治疗方法至关重要。在此,我们调查烧伤试验中患者入组的性别、种族和民族差异。
对在clinicaltrials.gov上以“烧伤”为检索词注册的高质量、偏倚风险降低的烧伤随机对照试验(RCT)的参与者进行横断面分析。纳入至少报告两个人口统计学组、采用双重或更高程度盲法且结果可通过注册库或出版物获取的已完成RCT。收集试验特征(申办国、地点、启动年份、研究阶段、盲法)和人口统计学数据(根据美国报告指南的性别、种族、民族)。全球疾病负担数据库提供基于性别的烧伤疾病负担。主要结局是入组女性参与者的人口与患病率之比。次要结局包括与研究盲法、阶段以及研究/申办方地点相关的种族和民族群体的代表性。
在546条记录中,39项试验符合纳入标准(2919名参与者)。所有试验均报告了性别 demographics,女性占所有参与者的37.02%(PPR = 0.71,95% CI [0.59, 0.82],可能表明相对于其实际疾病负担代表性不足)。分别只有7项和9项试验报告了民族和种族,尽管并不全面。在报告种族或民族的试验中,白人和黑人分别占参与者的57.52%和21.80%,而只有9.80%为西班牙裔/拉丁裔。种族和民族的严重报告不足排除了对研究变量进行许多次要显著性检验的可能性。
在高质量的美国注册烧伤试验中,女性的代表性可能不足,这与她们在现实世界中的疾病负担不符。此外,注意到种族和民族的严重报告不足。未来的试验应纳入不同的人口统计学和公平的人群,以提高研究的可推广性。