Suppr超能文献

在疼痛急性期使用非甾体抗炎药或类固醇对慢性疼痛发生率的影响:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effect of use of NSAIDs or steroids during the acute phase of pain on the incidence of chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.

Division of Intelligent and Biomechanical System, State Key Laboratory of Tribology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Haidian, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Inflammopharmacology. 2024 Apr;32(2):1039-1058. doi: 10.1007/s10787-023-01405-8. Epub 2023 Dec 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study is the first to summarize the evidence on how the use of anti-inflammatory drugs during acute pain has an impact on the development of chronic pain.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials retrieved from nine databases included anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs or steroids) versus non-anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with acute pain and reported the incidence of chronic pain. No specified date, age, sex, or language restrictions. Subgroup analyses were performed according to pain classification, follow-up time, and medication. The GRADE method was used to evaluate quality of evidence.

RESULTS

A total of 29 trials (5220 patients) were included. Steroids or NSAIDs did not reduce the incidence of chronic nociceptive pain. Steroid use in acute phase significantly reduced the incidence of chronic neuropathic pain. In subgroup analysis, benefits were observed for methylprednisolone and dexamethasone, with some adverse effects. Steroids or NSAIDs were statistically significant in reducing pain intensity over 1 year, but the effect size was too small, and whether the long-term effect is clinically relevant needs to be further studied.

CONCLUSION

Quality of the evidence was low to moderate. No drug can be recommended to prevent chronic nociceptive pain. Injections of steroids (methylprednisolone or dexamethasone) during the acute phase reduce the incidence of chronic neuropathic pain, but most included studies also used local anesthetics. The results are indirect and need to be interpreted with caution. The pooled data effect sizes for pain intensity were small, so the clinical relevance was unclear. Study registration PROSPERO (CRD42022367030).

摘要

背景

本研究首次总结了在急性疼痛期间使用抗炎药物对慢性疼痛发展的影响的证据。

方法

从九个数据库中检索到的随机对照试验包括在急性疼痛患者中使用抗炎药物(非甾体抗炎药或类固醇)与非抗炎药物,并报告慢性疼痛的发生率。没有特定的日期、年龄、性别或语言限制。根据疼痛分类、随访时间和药物进行亚组分析。使用 GRADE 方法评估证据质量。

结果

共纳入 29 项试验(5220 名患者)。类固醇或 NSAIDs 不能降低慢性伤害性疼痛的发生率。在急性期使用类固醇可显著降低慢性神经性疼痛的发生率。在亚组分析中,甲泼尼龙和地塞米松具有获益,且有一些不良反应。类固醇或 NSAIDs 在 1 年内降低疼痛强度方面具有统计学意义,但效应量太小,长期效果是否具有临床相关性需要进一步研究。

结论

证据质量为低到中等。没有药物可以推荐用于预防慢性伤害性疼痛。在急性期注射类固醇(甲泼尼龙或地塞米松)可降低慢性神经性疼痛的发生率,但大多数纳入的研究也使用了局部麻醉剂。结果是间接的,需要谨慎解释。疼痛强度的汇总数据效应量较小,因此临床相关性尚不清楚。研究注册 PROSPERO(CRD42022367030)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fc3/11006744/075feff9a191/10787_2023_1405_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验