Suppr超能文献

正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描重建及其对[代谢肿瘤体积]的影响。

PET/CT Reconstruction and Its Impact on [Measures of] Metabolic Tumor Volume.

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany (H.K., J.W., L.V.H., C.A.V., M.D., C.K., K.R.).

German Hodgkin Study Group, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Cologne Bonn, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (M.F., P.B.).

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2024 Jul;31(7):3020-3025. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.12.016. Epub 2023 Dec 27.

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

In oncological imaging, the use of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) for further prognostic differentiation and the development of risk adapted strategies appears promising. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate ultra-high definition (UHD) and ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) PET/CT reconstructions for their potential impact on different methods of MTV measurement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) scans of 40 Hodgkin lymphoma patients before first-line treatment who had undergone fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT. The MTVs were determined taking an SUV of 4.0 (MTV4.0) as a fixed threshold or 41% of the single hottest voxel (MTV41%) as an adaptive threshold for automated lymphoma delineation in both UHD and OSEM reconstructions. We then compared the absolute and relative differences between MTV4.0 and MTV41% in UHD and OSEM reconstructions. The relative distribution of MTV4.0 and MTV41% in relation to the reconstruction method applied was recorded and respective differences were tested for statistical significance using the paired sample t-test.

RESULTS

A comparison of MTV4.0 and MTV41% showed smaller relative and absolute differences in MTV between different reconstruction settings for the MTV4.0 method. Conversely, the absolute as well as the relative differences between MTVs obtained from different reconstructions settings were significantly greater when the MTV41% method was applied (p < 0001).

CONCLUSION

MTV4.0 brings higher robustness between different reconstruction settings, while with MTV41% the deviation between volumes obtained with different reconstruction settings is greater. For clinical routine and for multicenter settings, the MTV4.0 therefore appears most promising.

摘要

背景与目的

在肿瘤影像学中,代谢肿瘤体积(MTV)在进一步预测预后和制定风险适应策略方面的应用具有广阔的前景。本分析旨在评估超高分辨率(UHD)和有序子集期望最大化(OSEM)PET/CT 重建在不同 MTV 测量方法中的潜在影响。

材料与方法

我们分析了 40 例初治霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的正电子发射断层扫描(PET)/CT 扫描,这些患者均接受了氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)PET/CT 检查。采用 SUV 为 4.0(MTV4.0)的固定阈值或单个最热体素的 41%(MTV41%)的自适应阈值,对 UHD 和 OSEM 重建中的自动淋巴瘤勾画进行 MTV 测量。然后比较 UHD 和 OSEM 重建中 MTV4.0 和 MTV41%的绝对和相对差异。记录 MTV4.0 和 MTV41%在不同重建方法中的相对分布,并使用配对样本 t 检验对各自的差异进行统计学显著性检验。

结果

与 MTV41% 相比,MTV4.0 方法在不同重建设置下的 MTV 之间的相对和绝对差异较小。相反,当使用 MTV41% 方法时,不同重建设置下获得的 MTV 之间的绝对和相对差异显著更大(p<0.0001)。

结论

与不同的重建设置相比,MTV4.0 具有更高的稳健性,而 MTV41% 则使不同重建设置之间的体积偏差更大。对于临床常规和多中心设置,MTV4.0 因此具有更大的优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验