• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

依折麦布辛伐他汀乙酯在 REDUCE-IT USA 中的成本效益:来自美国随机分组患者的结果。

Cost-Effectiveness of Icosapent Ethyl in REDUCE-IT USA: Results From Patients Randomized in the United States.

机构信息

MedStar Healthcare Delivery Research Network MedStar Health Research Institute Washington DC USA.

Department of Medicine Georgetown University Washington DC USA.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jan 2;13(1):e032413. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032413. Epub 2023 Dec 29.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.123.032413
PMID:38156550
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10863822/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 3146 REDUCE-IT USA (Reduction of Cardiovascular Events With Icosapent Ethyl Intervention Trial USA) participants, icosapent ethyl (IPE) reduced first and total cardiovascular events by 31% and 36%, respectively, over 4.9 years of follow-up.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used participant-level data from REDUCE-IT USA, 2021 US costs, and IPE costs ranging from $4.59 to $11.48 per day, allowing us to examine a range of possible medication costs. The in-trial analysis was participant-level, whereas the lifetime analysis used a Markov model. Both analyses considered value from a US health sector perspective. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (incremental costs divided by incremental quality-adjusted life-years) of IPE compared with standard care (SC) was the primary outcome measure. There was incremental gain in quality-adjusted life-years with IPE compared with SC using in-trial (3.28 versus 3.13) and lifetime (10.36 versus 9.83) horizons. Using an IPE cost of $4.59 per day, health care costs were lower with IPE compared with SC for both in-trial ($29 420 versus $30 947) and lifetime ($216 243 versus $219 212) analyses. IPE versus SC was a dominant strategy in trial and over the lifetime, with 99.7% lifetime probability of an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio <$50 000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. At a medication cost of $11.48 per day, the cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained was $36 208 in trial and $9582 over the lifetime.

CONCLUSIONS

In this analysis, at $4.59 per day, IPE offers better outcomes than SC at lower costs in trial and over a lifetime and is cost-effective at $11.48 per day for conventional willingness-to-pay thresholds. Treatment with IPE should be strongly considered in US patients like those enrolled in REDUCE-IT USA.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01492361.

摘要

背景

在 3146 名 REDUCE-IT USA(美国降低心血管事件用依泽替米贝干预试验)参与者中,依泽替米贝(IPE)在 4.9 年的随访中分别降低了 31%和 36%的首次和总心血管事件。

方法和结果

我们使用了来自 REDUCE-IT USA 的参与者水平数据、2021 年美国成本以及 IPE 每天 4.59 美元至 11.48 美元的成本,从而可以检查一系列可能的药物成本。临床试验分析是基于参与者水平的,而终生分析则使用了 Markov 模型。这两种分析都从美国卫生部门的角度考虑了价值。IPE 与标准治疗(SC)相比的增量成本效益比(增量成本除以增量质量调整生命年)是主要的结果衡量指标。与 SC 相比,IPE 在临床试验(3.28 比 3.13)和终生(10.36 比 9.83)范围内均有质量调整生命年的增量收益。使用每天 4.59 美元的 IPE 成本,与 SC 相比,IPE 在临床试验(29420 美元比 30947 美元)和终生(216243 美元比 219212 美元)分析中均降低了医疗保健成本。IPE 与 SC 相比是一种占主导地位的策略,在试验和终生内,获得的每增加一个质量调整生命年的增量成本效益比有 99.7%的可能性低于 50000 美元。在药物成本为每天 11.48 美元的情况下,获得的每个质量调整生命年的成本为试验中的 36208 美元,终生中的 9582 美元。

结论

在这项分析中,以每天 4.59 美元的价格,IPE 在试验和终生内提供了比 SC 更好的结果,成本更低,并且在每天 11.48 美元的传统意愿支付阈值下具有成本效益。在美国的 REDUCE-IT USA 参与者中,应强烈考虑使用 IPE 进行治疗。

注册

网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT01492361。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60ea/10863822/b8f998467d50/JAH3-13-e032413-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60ea/10863822/66b465063ce8/JAH3-13-e032413-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60ea/10863822/b6f16d2b8b38/JAH3-13-e032413-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60ea/10863822/ca63f09e9e4f/JAH3-13-e032413-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60ea/10863822/b8f998467d50/JAH3-13-e032413-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60ea/10863822/66b465063ce8/JAH3-13-e032413-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60ea/10863822/b6f16d2b8b38/JAH3-13-e032413-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60ea/10863822/ca63f09e9e4f/JAH3-13-e032413-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/60ea/10863822/b8f998467d50/JAH3-13-e032413-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Icosapent Ethyl in REDUCE-IT USA: Results From Patients Randomized in the United States.依折麦布辛伐他汀乙酯在 REDUCE-IT USA 中的成本效益:来自美国随机分组患者的结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Jan 2;13(1):e032413. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032413. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
2
Cost-effectiveness of Icosapent Ethyl for High-risk Patients With Hypertriglyceridemia Despite Statin Treatment.依折麦布辛伐他汀与icosapent ethyl 治疗高风险高甘油三酯血症患者的成本效果比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2148172. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48172.
3
Reducing residual cardiovascular risk in Europe: Therapeutic implications of European medicines agency approval of icosapent ethyl/eicosapentaenoic acid.降低欧洲剩余心血管风险:欧洲药品管理局批准依泽替米贝/二十碳五烯酸的治疗意义。
Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Sep;237:108172. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2022.108172. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
4
The cost-effectiveness of icosapent ethyl in combination with statin therapy compared with statin alone for cardiovascular risk reduction.依折麦布辛伐他汀与他汀类药物联合治疗与他汀类药物单药治疗相比在降低心血管风险方面的成本效益。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021 Jul 23;28(8):897-904. doi: 10.1177/2047487319896648. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of Icosapent Ethyl (IPE) for the Reduction of the Risk of Ischemic Cardiovascular Events in Canada.二十碳五烯酸乙酯(IPE)降低加拿大缺血性心血管事件风险的成本效益分析
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Apr 20;15:295-308. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S377935. eCollection 2023.
6
Icosapent Ethyl for Primary Versus Secondary Prevention of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Hypertriglyceridemia: Value for Money Analysis.依泽替米贝用于高甘油三酯血症患者一级和二级预防主要不良心血管事件的成本效果分析。
Am J Med. 2021 Jul;134(7):e415-e419. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.12.023. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
7
The cost-effectiveness of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids - The Australian healthcare perspective.ω-3 多不饱和脂肪酸的成本效益 - 澳大利亚医疗保健视角。
Eur J Intern Med. 2019 Sep;67:70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Jul 6.
8
Assessing long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of statin therapy in the UK: a modelling study using individual participant data sets.评估英国他汀类药物治疗的长期有效性和成本效益:一项使用个体参与者数据集的建模研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Dec;28(79):1-134. doi: 10.3310/KDAP7034.
9
The case for adding eicosapentaenoic acid (icosapent ethyl) to the ABCs of cardiovascular disease prevention.有充分理由将二十碳五烯酸(二十碳五烯酸乙酯)添加到心血管疾病预防的 ABC 中。
Postgrad Med. 2021 Jan;133(1):28-41. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2020.1783937. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
10
Cost-Effectiveness of Icosapent Ethyl, Evolocumab, Alirocumab, Ezetimibe, or Fenofibrate in Combination with Statins Compared to Statin Monotherapy.依泽替米贝、依洛尤单抗、阿利西尤单抗、二十碳五烯酸乙酯或非诺贝特联合他汀类药物与他汀类药物单药治疗相比的成本效益。
Clin Drug Investig. 2022 Aug;42(8):643-656. doi: 10.1007/s40261-022-01173-3. Epub 2022 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Omega-3 Therapy and Its Cardiovascular Benefits: What About Icosapent Ethyl? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.评估ω-3疗法及其心血管益处:二十碳五烯酸乙酯情况如何?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Apr 20;18(4):601. doi: 10.3390/ph18040601.
2
Cardiovascular Outcomes With Icosapent Ethyl by Baseline Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol: A Secondary Analysis of the REDUCE-IT Randomized Trial.依洛尤单抗乙酯对基线低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的心血管结局影响:REDUCE-IT随机试验的二次分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Mar 4;14(5):e038656. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.038656. Epub 2025 Feb 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Uptake of non-statin lipid-lowering therapies for secondary prevention in community practice.社区实践中二级预防的非他汀类降脂治疗药物的应用。
J Clin Lipidol. 2023 May-Jun;17(3):412-414. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2023.03.006. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
2
The potential population health impact of treating REDUCE-IT eligible US adults with Icosapent Ethyl.用二十碳五烯酸乙酯治疗符合REDUCE-IT标准的美国成年人对人群健康的潜在影响。
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2022 Apr 28;10:100345. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2022.100345. eCollection 2022 Jun.
3
Estimated Aggregate Treatment Benefit With Addition of Multiple Novel Medications for Secondary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.
添加多种新型药物用于动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病二级预防的估计总体治疗效益。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Jan-Dec;27:10742484221084772. doi: 10.1177/10742484221084772.
4
Cost-effectiveness of Icosapent Ethyl for High-risk Patients With Hypertriglyceridemia Despite Statin Treatment.依折麦布辛伐他汀与icosapent ethyl 治疗高风险高甘油三酯血症患者的成本效果比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Feb 1;5(2):e2148172. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48172.
5
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations.《2022 年健康经济评估报告标准》(CHEERS 2022)声明:更新的健康经济评估报告指南。
BMJ. 2022 Jan 11;376:e067975. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-067975.
6
Cost-Effectiveness of Lipid-Lowering Therapies for Cardiovascular Prevention in Germany.降脂治疗在德国心血管预防中的成本效益。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2023 Aug;37(4):683-694. doi: 10.1007/s10557-021-07310-y. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
7
10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022.10. 心血管疾病和风险管理:2022 年糖尿病医学护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jan 1;45(Suppl 1):S144-S174. doi: 10.2337/dc22-S010.
8
United States Life Tables, 2017.《2017年美国生命表》
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2019 Jun;68(7):1-66.
9
Clinical Management of Stable Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.《2 型糖尿病患者稳定型冠状动脉疾病的临床管理:美国心脏协会的科学声明》。
Circulation. 2020 May 12;141(19):e779-e806. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000766. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
10
National Lipid Association Scientific Statement on the use of icosapent ethyl in statin-treated patients with elevated triglycerides and high or very-high ASCVD risk.国家脂质协会关于在他汀类药物治疗的甘油三酯升高和高或极高 ASCVD 风险患者中使用二十碳五烯酸乙酯的科学声明。
J Clin Lipidol. 2019 Nov-Dec;13(6):860-872. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2019.10.014. Epub 2019 Nov 2.