Li Elizabeth, Campbell Chloe, Midgley Nick, Luyten Patrick
Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London; Anna Freud Centre, London.
Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, United Kingdom; Anna Freud Centre, London, United Kingdom; Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Leuven.
Res Psychother. 2023 Dec 20;26(3):704. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2023.704.
Originally rooted in philosophy and sociology, the concept of epistemic trust has recently transitioned to developmental psychopathology, illuminating social-cognitive processes in psychopathology. This narrative review synthesizes empirical evidence on epistemic trust to inform future research. A literature search highlighted 3 areas: i) the development of selective trust in children; ii) epistemic trust in non-clinical adults; iii) its link to mental health. Young children demonstrate selective learning from reliable sources using epistemic cues. Empirical studies beyond childhood were greatly facilitated in the last 2 years with the introduction of the Epistemic Trust, Mistrust and Credulity Questionnaire, a self-report scale measuring epistemic stance. Cross-sectional studies pinpointed dysfunctional epistemic strategies as factors in mental health vulnerability, and some qualitative work offered initial evidence linking restored epistemic trust to effective psychotherapy. For future research, we propose focusing on 3 primary areas. First, empirical investigations in adolescent samples are needed, as adolescence seems to be a pivotal phase in the development of epistemic trust. Second, more experimental research is required to assess dysfunctional and functional epistemic stances and how they relate to vulnerability to mental health disorders. Finally, intervention studies should explore the dynamics of epistemic stances within and between therapy sessions and their impact on therapeutic outcomes.
认知信任的概念最初源于哲学和社会学,最近已转向发展性精神病理学领域,为精神病理学中的社会认知过程提供了新的视角。本叙述性综述综合了有关认知信任的实证证据,为未来的研究提供参考。文献检索突出了三个领域:i)儿童选择性信任的发展;ii)非临床成年人的认知信任;iii)其与心理健康的联系。幼儿利用认知线索从可靠来源进行选择性学习。在过去两年中,随着认知信任、不信任和轻信问卷(一种测量认知立场的自陈量表)的引入,童年期之后的实证研究得到了极大的推动。横断面研究指出功能失调的认知策略是心理健康易感性的因素,一些定性研究提供了初步证据,将恢复的认知信任与有效的心理治疗联系起来。对于未来的研究,我们建议关注三个主要领域。首先,需要对青少年样本进行实证研究,因为青春期似乎是认知信任发展的关键阶段。其次,需要更多的实验研究来评估功能失调和功能正常的认知立场,以及它们与心理健康障碍易感性的关系。最后,干预研究应探索治疗过程中及治疗过程之间认知立场的动态变化及其对治疗效果的影响。