Suppr超能文献

认知信任:对实证见解及对发展性精神病理学影响的全面综述

Epistemic trust: a comprehensive review of empirical insights and implications for developmental psychopathology.

作者信息

Li Elizabeth, Campbell Chloe, Midgley Nick, Luyten Patrick

机构信息

Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London; Anna Freud Centre, London.

Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, United Kingdom; Anna Freud Centre, London, United Kingdom; Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Leuven.

出版信息

Res Psychother. 2023 Dec 20;26(3):704. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2023.704.

Abstract

Originally rooted in philosophy and sociology, the concept of epistemic trust has recently transitioned to developmental psychopathology, illuminating social-cognitive processes in psychopathology. This narrative review synthesizes empirical evidence on epistemic trust to inform future research. A literature search highlighted 3 areas: i) the development of selective trust in children; ii) epistemic trust in non-clinical adults; iii) its link to mental health. Young children demonstrate selective learning from reliable sources using epistemic cues. Empirical studies beyond childhood were greatly facilitated in the last 2 years with the introduction of the Epistemic Trust, Mistrust and Credulity Questionnaire, a self-report scale measuring epistemic stance. Cross-sectional studies pinpointed dysfunctional epistemic strategies as factors in mental health vulnerability, and some qualitative work offered initial evidence linking restored epistemic trust to effective psychotherapy. For future research, we propose focusing on 3 primary areas. First, empirical investigations in adolescent samples are needed, as adolescence seems to be a pivotal phase in the development of epistemic trust. Second, more experimental research is required to assess dysfunctional and functional epistemic stances and how they relate to vulnerability to mental health disorders. Finally, intervention studies should explore the dynamics of epistemic stances within and between therapy sessions and their impact on therapeutic outcomes.

摘要

认知信任的概念最初源于哲学和社会学,最近已转向发展性精神病理学领域,为精神病理学中的社会认知过程提供了新的视角。本叙述性综述综合了有关认知信任的实证证据,为未来的研究提供参考。文献检索突出了三个领域:i)儿童选择性信任的发展;ii)非临床成年人的认知信任;iii)其与心理健康的联系。幼儿利用认知线索从可靠来源进行选择性学习。在过去两年中,随着认知信任、不信任和轻信问卷(一种测量认知立场的自陈量表)的引入,童年期之后的实证研究得到了极大的推动。横断面研究指出功能失调的认知策略是心理健康易感性的因素,一些定性研究提供了初步证据,将恢复的认知信任与有效的心理治疗联系起来。对于未来的研究,我们建议关注三个主要领域。首先,需要对青少年样本进行实证研究,因为青春期似乎是认知信任发展的关键阶段。其次,需要更多的实验研究来评估功能失调和功能正常的认知立场,以及它们与心理健康障碍易感性的关系。最后,干预研究应探索治疗过程中及治疗过程之间认知立场的动态变化及其对治疗效果的影响。

相似文献

2
Development and validation of a self-report measure of epistemic trust.
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 16;16(4):e0250264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250264. eCollection 2021.
4
Trust under development: The Italian validation of the Epistemic Trust, Mistrust, and Credulity Questionnaire (ETMCQ) for adolescents.
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 26;19(8):e0307229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307229. eCollection 2024.
9
Validation of the Argentine version of the epistemic trust, mistrust, and credulity questionnaire.
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 3;19(10):e0311352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311352. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Trauma, personality structure and psychopathology: a cartography of psychodynamic constructs.
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2025 Aug 18;12(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40479-025-00308-0.
2
Epistemic Trust, Mistrust and Credulity Questionnaire (ETMCQ) validation in French language: Exploring links to loneliness.
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 21;20(3):e0303918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303918. eCollection 2025.
3
Neuroscience-based relational art therapy and deep brain reorienting in the treatment of dissociative identity disorder.
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 28;16:1454483. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1454483. eCollection 2025.
4
The role of epistemic trust and epistemic disruption in vaccine hesitancy, conspiracy thinking and the capacity to identify fake news.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Dec 4;4(12):e0003941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003941. eCollection 2024.
6
More than Meets the "I": A Panoramic View of Epistemic Trust in Psychotherapy.
Psychopathology. 2025;58(2):80-93. doi: 10.1159/000541667. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
7
A preliminary validation of PMQ-A four-factor questionnaire measuring parental mentalizing.
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 12;15:1250092. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1250092. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

6
Unpacking trust: The Italian validation of the Epistemic Trust, Mistrust, and Credulity Questionnaire (ETMCQ).
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0280328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280328. eCollection 2023.
8
Adolescence in lockdown: The protective role of mentalizing and epistemic trust.
J Clin Psychol. 2023 Apr;79(4):969-984. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23453. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
10
Mapping the journey from epistemic mistrust in depressed adolescents receiving psychotherapy.
J Couns Psychol. 2022 Oct;69(5):678-690. doi: 10.1037/cou0000625. Epub 2022 Jun 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验