Suppr超能文献

主动脉瓣置换术后人工瓣膜心内膜炎:生物瓣与机械瓣的差异

Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis After Aortic Valve Replacement: Differences Between Biological and Mechanical Prostheses.

作者信息

Timmermans Naomi, Lam Ka Yan, van Straten Albert, van 't Veer Marcel, Soliman-Hamad Mohamed

机构信息

Heart Center, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Heart Center, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Heart Lung Circ. 2024 Jan;33(1):130-137. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2023.11.024. Epub 2023 Dec 28.

Abstract

AIMS

Prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) is the most severe form of infective endocarditis associated with a high mortality rate. Whether PVE affects biological and mechanical aortic valves to the same extent remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the incidence of re-intervention because of PVE between bioprosthetic and mechanical valves.

METHODS

Patients undergoing isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) or combined AVR in a single cardiac surgery centre between January 1998 and December 2019 were analysed. All patients who underwent re-intervention because of PVE were identified. The primary endpoint was the rate of explants. Freedom from re-intervention and variables associated with re-intervention were analysed using Cox regression analysis including correction for competing risk.

RESULTS

During the study period, 5,983 aortic valve prostheses were implanted, including 3,620 biological (60.5%) and 2,363 mechanical (39.5%) prostheses. The overall mean follow-up period was 7.3±5.3 years (median, 6.5; IQR 2.9-11.2 years). The rate of re-intervention for PVE in the biological group was 1.5% (n=54) compared with 1.7% (n=40) in the mechanical group (p=0.541). Cox regression analysis revealed that younger age (HR 0.960, 95% CI 0.942-0.979; p<0.001), male sex (HR 2.362, 95% CI 1.384-4.033; p=0.002), higher creatinine (HR 1.002, 95% CI 0.999-1.004; p=0.057), and biological valve prosthesis (HR 2.073, 95% CI 1.258-3.414; p=0.004) were associated with re-intervention for PVE. After correction for competing risk of death, biological valve prosthesis was significantly associated with a higher rate of re-intervention for PVE (HR 2.011, 95% CI 1.177-3.437; p=0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

According to this single-centre, observational, retrospective cohort study, AVR using biological prosthesis is associated with re-intervention for PVE compared to mechanical prosthesis. Further investigations are needed to verify these findings.

摘要

目的

人工瓣膜心内膜炎(PVE)是感染性心内膜炎最严重的形式,死亡率很高。PVE对生物主动脉瓣和机械主动脉瓣的影响程度是否相同仍存在争议。本研究旨在比较生物瓣膜和机械瓣膜因PVE进行再次干预的发生率。

方法

分析1998年1月至2019年12月在单一心脏手术中心接受单纯外科主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)或联合AVR的患者。确定所有因PVE接受再次干预的患者。主要终点是瓣膜置换率。使用Cox回归分析(包括对竞争风险进行校正)分析再次干预的自由度以及与再次干预相关的变量。

结果

在研究期间,共植入了5983个主动脉瓣假体,其中生物假体3620个(占60.5%),机械假体2363个(占39.5%)。总体平均随访期为7.3±5.3年(中位数为6.5年;四分位数间距为2.9 - 11.2年)。生物瓣膜组因PVE进行再次干预的发生率为1.5%(n = 54),而机械瓣膜组为1.7%(n = 40)(p = 0.541)。Cox回归分析显示,年龄较小(风险比[HR] 0.960,95%置信区间[CI] 0.942 - 0.979;p < 0.001)、男性(HR 2.362,95% CI 1.384 - 4.033;p = 0.002)、肌酐水平较高(HR 1.002,95% CI 0.999 - 1.004;p = 0.057)以及生物瓣膜假体(HR 2.073,95% CI 1.258 - 3.414;p = 0.0

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验