Abdulhameed Nader, Volschow Bryce, Abedi Tania, Bifaretti Nicole, Slipak Inessa, Manibo Alexandra, Hussein Hind
Associate Professor, Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.
DMD student, School of Dentistry, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Erie, Pa.
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Dec 29. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.11.031.
Worn denture teeth are a common reason for replacing complete dentures. However, clinical studies on the amount of denture tooth wear are lacking.
The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the clinical wear of denture teeth made from double cross-linked (DCL) versus highly cross-linked (HCL) materials after 1 year in service.
Fourteen participants received maxillary and mandibular removable complete dentures (RCDs). The participants randomly received either DCL or HCL teeth. Each RCD was scanned with an intraoral scanner 1 week after finishing any occlusal adjustment and after 1 year. Occlusal contact marks were recorded using articulating paper, and photographs were made in centric and eccentric movements. The generated 1-week and 1-year standard tessellation language (STL) files of the scans were obtained and trimmed using the Geomagic X software program. After merging the files, the depth of the wear facets was measured using the software program tool that measures the vertical gap distance in micrometers at 100 points distributed on the contact areas. These areas were identified by using the segment tools in the software program. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the differences between the collected data (α=.05).
The DCL had higher mean ±standard deviation wear (62.7 ±40 µm) than the HCL (37 ±31 µm) after 1 year in service (P<.001).
Both DCL and HCL denture teeth showed acceptable clinical wear after 1 year of clinical use. HCL denture teeth showed more resistance to occlusal wear than DCL denture teeth.
义齿牙齿磨损是更换全口义齿的常见原因。然而,目前缺乏关于义齿牙齿磨损量的临床研究。
本临床研究的目的是比较使用一年后,由双交联(DCL)材料与高交联(HCL)材料制成的义齿牙齿的临床磨损情况。
14名参与者接受了上颌和下颌可摘全口义齿(RCD)。参与者随机接受DCL或HCL牙齿。在完成任何咬合调整后1周以及1年后,使用口腔内扫描仪对每个RCD进行扫描。使用咬合纸记录咬合接触痕迹,并拍摄正中及非正中运动时的照片。获取扫描生成的1周和1年的标准镶嵌语言(STL)文件,并使用Geomagic X软件程序进行修剪。合并文件后,使用该软件程序工具测量磨损小平面的深度,该工具可测量分布在接触区域的100个点处的垂直间隙距离(以微米为单位)。这些区域通过使用软件程序中的分割工具来识别。采用重复测量方差分析来分析收集到的数据之间的差异(α = 0.05)。
使用一年后,DCL的平均磨损±标准差(62.7±40 µm)高于HCL(37±31 µm)(P <.001)。
临床使用一年后,DCL和HCL义齿牙齿均表现出可接受的临床磨损。HCL义齿牙齿比DCL义齿牙齿更耐咬合磨损。