Cameron Luke W J, Roche William K, Beckett Katy, Payne Nicholas L
School of Natural Sciences, Department of Zoology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Inland Fisheries Ireland, 3044 Lake Drive, Citywest Business Campus, Dublin D24 CK66, Ireland.
Conserv Physiol. 2023 Dec 28;11(1):coad100. doi: 10.1093/conphys/coad100. eCollection 2023.
Until relatively recently commercial fisheries have been considered the main driving factor for elasmobranch population declines. However, this belief has begun to shift with the realization that recreational elasmobranch catches may equal or exceed commercial catches in some regions. Many recreational angling fisheries for elasmobranchs involve high participation in catch-and-release angling practices. However, high release rates may not necessarily equate to high survival rates. Therefore, to assist accurate assessment of the potential impact of recreational angling on elasmobranchs, we attempted to summarize and integrate currently available information on specific risk factors associated with recreational angling, alongside associated mortality rates, as well as information on angler behaviour as it relates to identified risk factors. We categorized the major angling-related effects into two groups: injury-induced effects; and biochemical disruption-induced effects; providing a summary of each group and outlining the main lethal and sub-lethal outcomes stemming from these. These outcomes include immediate and delayed post-release mortality, behavioural recovery periods (which may in-turn confer increased predation risks), chronic health impacts and capture-induced parturition and abortion. Additionally, we detailed a range of angling practices and equipment, including hook-type, hook removal and emersion (i.e. air exposure), as well as inter- and intra-specific factors, including aerobic scope, respiratory mode, body size and species-specific behaviours, which are likely to influence injury and/or mortality rates and should therefore be considered when assessing angling-related impacts. We then utilized these data to provide a range of actionable recommendations for both anglers and policymakers which would serve to reduce the population-level impact of recreational angling on these enigmatic animals.
直到最近,商业渔业一直被认为是板鳃亚类种群数量下降的主要驱动因素。然而,随着人们意识到在某些地区休闲渔业捕获的板鳃亚类可能与商业捕获量相当或超过商业捕获量,这种观念开始发生转变。许多休闲钓获板鳃亚类的渔业活动都高度参与了钓后放生的做法。然而,高放生率不一定等同于高存活率。因此,为了协助准确评估休闲垂钓对板鳃亚类的潜在影响,我们试图总结并整合当前关于与休闲垂钓相关的特定风险因素的可用信息,以及相关的死亡率,还有与已确定风险因素相关的垂钓者行为信息。我们将与垂钓相关的主要影响分为两类:伤害诱导效应;以及生化干扰诱导效应;对每一类进行了总结,并概述了由此产生的主要致死和亚致死结果。这些结果包括放生后立即和延迟的死亡率、行为恢复期(这反过来可能会增加被捕食的风险)、慢性健康影响以及捕获诱导的分娩和流产。此外,我们详细介绍了一系列垂钓做法和设备,包括鱼钩类型、鱼钩摘除和暴露(即空气暴露),以及种间和种内因素,包括有氧代谢范围、呼吸模式、体型和物种特定行为,这些因素可能会影响伤害率和/或死亡率,因此在评估与垂钓相关的影响时应予以考虑。然后,我们利用这些数据为垂钓者和政策制定者提供了一系列可行的建议,以减少休闲垂钓对这些神秘动物的种群水平影响。